Chris Hoy - hard work and dreaming big

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
ebandit said:
There is an argument but you aren't clever enough to see it.......let me spell it out for you as simply as I can.......multi Olympic golds in the 2000s are being cited (sorry for the difficult word) as evidence of doping......therefore by that logic Wiggins was doping to win his 3 Olympic golds in 2004-08........still with me?.....and yet......during those very same years he was having NO success on the roads.........certainly in comparison to 2009-12........so either the doping only worked when riding on wooden boards....or........shock horror......he wasn't doping.........if he was doping for those 2004-08 golds then what accounts for the sudden leap in performance in 2009???......... Can't be dope because he was already doping following Hitch logic......there........that is probably about three or four logical steps too many for you to manage so doubtless you'll come back with something typically fatuous

Mark L

Wiggins can't have been doping because he didn't win the tour de France and Olympic pursuit in the same year?:confused:

Wtf is this logic. It's like saying Armstrong can't have been doping because he only did the marathon in 3 hours. If he was a doper he would have broken the world record. Because all sports are the same and require the same doping methods:rolleyes:
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Peter70 said:
Just another sad racist with some sort of drugs fetish.

Some people seem to be forgetting the much smaller talent pool in track cycling and the greater return of medals compared to investment compared to real Worldwide sports.

Same goes for rowing, sailing and horse-boarding.

Not everybody who has ever won a medal was on drugs. Would some people just like to admit that before they make themselves look even more pathetic than normal?
I feel your pain...

In a sport rifled with doping a man who wins is just suspect, sorry for your sorry English **** the person is/was British. Me thinks you are the moral superior racist here.

Ay59F7kCIAA43FM.jpg


I like Hoy so he must be cleans, Scotts - not Brits - dont dope.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybxfZoT6VHQ
Scottish-flag_2109121b.jpg


Game on.
 
the sceptic said:
Where did I say he refused to dope on the road? And it is well known that people dope in all kinds of sports that have absolutely no money or fame.

All we know is that he had a gigantic leap in performance in 2009. Obviously something changed. Either he went from clean to mega doper, or he went from small time doper to mega doper.

Kind of like the Dawg. We dont know if he was clean at Barloworld either.

Hoy, on the other hand, cleans. Hard work. Sacrifice.

I love how the point of view questioning claims of doping **completely** ignore the simple fact the current anti-doping policies for all IOC sports support doping, just minimize the controversy.
 
Dec 13, 2012
1,859
0
0
ralphbert said:
Do you think the track events lend themselves to more "genetic advantage" and less doping advantage than road? By this I mean there is more of a flat bell curve to Sprint power than endurance ie some people's make up just make them good sprinters where the endurance bell curve is more flat so everybody is more similar to a degree in trainability? Also the doping advantage to endurance has much more advantage than to power?

Aerobic fitness is more trainable than anaerobic qualities. However we all know that the 100m is one of the most doped events ever.
 
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
I feel your pain...

In a sport rifled with doping a man who wins is just suspect, sorry for your sorry English **** the person is/was British. Me thinks you are the moral superior racist here.

Ay59F7kCIAA43FM.jpg

Are you sure? Those legs look a lot like Forsterman's to me.
Couldn't this be the old Forsterman-Greipel pic?

This thread is really funny. Had a good LOL.
Keep it up lads!:D
 
Sep 14, 2011
1,980
0
0
Mellow Velo said:
Are you sure? Those legs look a lot like Forsterman's to me.
Couldn't this be the old Forsterman-Greipel pic?

This thread is really funny. Had a good LOL.
Keep it up lads!:D

Well said, this is rapidly becoming my favourite thread in the clinic.
 
The Hitch said:
Wiggins can't have been doping because he didn't win the tour de France and Olympic pursuit in the same year?:confused:

Wtf is this logic. It's like saying Armstrong can't have been doping because he only did the marathon in 3 hours. If he was a doper he would have broken the world record. Because all sports are the same and require the same doping methods:rolleyes:

He didn't just 'not win the Tdf' he was an irrelevance....... that has been a cornerstone of most of the arguments against Wiggins on this forum.........don't try and backtrack now or Sceptic and Bendy69 will have an aneurism ;).....

..........besides it isn't about Wiggins..... It is about using track golds as evidence of doping.....

Mark L
 
Bernie's eyesore said:
Great bloke that Chris Hoy, more than two years since he retired and not one person has come up with a single reason to suggest he doped on this thread. We should be celebrating this guy as a great role model.
I couldn't agree more, my friend.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Bernie's eyesore said:
Great bloke that Chris Hoy, more than two years since he retired and not one person has come up with a single reason to suggest he doped on this thread. We should be celebrating this guy as a great role model.

lol. He was a professional athlete that won and it is easy to get around the testing. Do the math.

Now you on the other hand has not come up with a single reason to suggest he was clean.

Being british and not testing positive doesnt count.
 
Sep 14, 2011
1,980
0
0
the sceptic said:
lol. He was a professional athlete that won and it is easy to get around the testing. Do the math.

Now you on the other hand has not come up with a single reason to suggest he was clean.

Being british and not testing positive doesnt count.

Like I already said, that reasoning can apply to any athlete in the history of any sport. I could just as easily accuse you of being a murderer on the grounds that some people are murderers and that most of them claimed not to be murderers. That's the extent of your argument.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Mellow Velo said:
Well, I never, who would have thought?
British porkie pies in the Clinic.:D

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=f...fflb&q=forstermann+greipel+legs+photo&spell=1

I knew I'd seen that photo before.

I dont see anywhere in the post with the photo that says those legs are Hoys?

Those legs of Forstermans are massive and dont look normal, but then neither did Hoys yet Hoy beat this guy time and time again.

No Hoy never tested positive, but neither did Armstrong, Ullrich, Basso, Millar, Hesjedal, Hincapie and plenty of others
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Bernie's eyesore said:
Like I already said, that reasoning can apply to any athlete in the history of any sport. I could just as easily accuse you of being a murderer on the grounds that some people are murderers and that most of them claimed not to be murderers. That's the extent of your argument.

Awful analogy. But wouldnt expect more.

Comparing murdering people to doping in sports. Reality check please.
 
Benotti69 said:
I dont see anywhere in the post with the photo that says those legs are Hoys?

Those legs of Forstermans are massive and dont look normal, but then neither did Hoys yet Hoy beat this guy time and time again.

No Hoy never tested positive, but neither did Armstrong, Ullrich, Basso, Millar, Hesjedal, Hincapie and plenty of others

I was looking at the post and it disappeared in a puff of smoke.:D

Anyhow, the quote was:
**** the person is/was British
So, clearly not Hoy, but clearly not............British.;)
 
Sep 14, 2011
1,980
0
0
the sceptic said:
Awful analogy. But wouldnt expect more.

Comparing murdering people to doping in sports. Reality check please.

It's exactly the same analogy which you used. The degree of the crime is irrelevant.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Mellow Velo said:
Are you sure? Those legs look a lot like Forsterman's to me.
Couldn't this be the old Forsterman-Greipel pic?

This thread is really funny. Had a good LOL.
Keep it up lads!:D
Of course it is Forsterman Mellow. Duh...

Who deleted my Flower of Scotland?
One of the best ever anthems.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Mellow Velo said:
I was looking at the post and it disappeared in a puff of smoke.:D

Anyhow, the quote was:
So, clearly not Hoy, but clearly not............British.;)

Why dont you post a photo of Hoy's 'normal' Olympic sized legs.....;)
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Bernie's eyesore said:
It's exactly the same analogy which you used. The degree of the crime is irrelevant.

do I really have to explain this?

1. Professional sport is an environment that promotes doping. Most societies do not promote murdering.

2. The ethical hurdle you have to overcome to cheat in sports is much much smaller than murdering another person.

3. Murdering someone doesnt always come with immediate financial benefits.

4. The likelyhood of getting caught is much bigger and the punishment much more severe if you murder someone.

Conclusion: Only a very small minority of the general population are potential murderers, so it is absurd to accuse a random person of being one.

I believe that proves my point. Thank you, the sceptic.