And other's here differ from that exactly how? I've read this thread and it reads like a remix of every Brit/Sky?Froome thread in the place, with the same protagonists saying the same things in a slightly different order. Face it: this place is stagnant, it opffers little to any anti-doping debate, in fact several posters have said their not even anti-doping. Too many people use it as a platform for their own prejudices, either national, teams or simply personalities. Don't like a rider? Start a thread about him. If he rides for Sky or he's British you're sure to get rousing chorus of approval from the various trolls in this place.Benotti69 said:Yet you keep coming back to threads about British riders with the same old tired lambasting the clinic. One would think you might be obfuscating at best Jim, or trolling, as it appears you last contributions offer nothing yet you post it verbatim.
And why shouldn't I post in British riders threads? I am British and the one truth of this place which I feel very keenly is the pervasive prejudice against all things British, being it riders, teams or Presidents of the UCI. That is the elephant in the room too many people try to ignore, or twist.
So I no longer look to convince, or frankly care about your opinions. After actively contributing to a place that I at least thought had an ethos and a mission I now just see a platform for people looking for an argument, and accusing riders of doping is merely the vehicle. So I've started to reply in kind, the few times I do come in here and bother reading anything posted.