Inner ring has a story on it:
http://inrng.com/2012/10/christophe-bassons-given-one-year-doping-ban/
The rules have to be followed, but I'm not sure the rules are sensible this time.
I remember a Norwegian footballer who was supposed to be tested after a match, but had left. The tester on the spot accepted the reason and tested someone else. His wife was giving birth in the hospital.

Can't remember if this was pre or post wada.
Anyway there should be some personal judgment involved by the tester. Like Cloxxki explains, the rules might not be sensible across all areas and levels.
Also I have no problem with testing not being random. Thats part of the point of the blood passport. Those who have suspicious profiles should be subjected to more testing.
Though I don't know about MTB marathons status in France. Perhaps those in the top tier have passports. I don't get the impression Bassons falls into that category though.
Of course if there is judgment involved, there is room for grudges too, but hopefully measures are in place to keep that from happening.
I wonder who handled the testing? AFLD or UCI? AFLD on behalf of the UCI? Or the UCI itself?
Perhaps they follow different methods of testing?
Inner ring says he got his ban reduced as much as possible. But perhaps he might get cleared in cas if they find his reason for absence being valid?
Anyway he never tested positive.
