No, there's several ways to prove doping. You must be thinking of someone else.Dear Wiggo said:Is this the same parker who says doping can't be proven either?
No, there's several ways to prove doping. You must be thinking of someone else.Dear Wiggo said:Is this the same parker who says doping can't be proven either?
Dear Wiggo said:Is this the same parker who says doping can't be proven either?
Parker said:No, there's several ways to prove doping. You must be thinking of someone else.
Marginal gains is sound principal which was around for ages before Brailsford had heard of it. It's underpinned Motorsport technology since Colin Chapman's time.the sceptic said:As a firm believer of marginal gains, parker knows a thing or two about dreaming big.
Parker said:Marginal gains is sound principal which was around for ages before Brailsford had heard of it.
No that's just one method. Bio passports for examples. Overwhelming witness statements supporting incriminating documentation. As examples.Dear Wiggo said:No no I am pretty sure it is. Unless there's a positive test that also survived a CAS appeal, it's not proof, right?
Certificates, wristbands, appeals, funds, petitions, movements. You'll lap it all up unquestioningly, won't you? You've picked your side and now everything is black and white.Dear Wiggo said:Anyway, I applaud people trying to do something for the culture of sport - period.
No, I believe that progress is made in small steps. Little by little in a variety of areas which aggregate to large steps. It underpins all advancement in all fields. That's all marginal gains is.Dear Wiggo said:Christ almighty. YOu believe Brailsford but not the 100CHF piece of paper.
Sprung bad dude. Sprung bad.
Parker said:Certificates, wristbands, appeals, funds, petitions. You'll lap it all up unquestioningly, won't you? You've picked you side and now everything is black and white.
.
Parker said:No, I believe that progress is made in small steps. Little by little in a variety of areas which aggregate to large steps. It underpins all advancement in all fields. That's all marginal gains is.
And what if I do? What gives your opinion more merit than mine?Dear Wiggo said:You believe Brailsford. Nuff said.
How about not employing doctors and coaches who have previously worked in cycling as Brailsford does. Do you applaud that? Seems better than selling paper to me.Dear Wiggo said:Anyway, I applaud people trying to do something for the culture of sport - period.
Parker said:How about not employing doctors and coaches who have previously worked in cycling as Brailsford does. Do you applaud that? Seems better than selling paper to me.
Just typing names won't convince anyone.Dear Wiggo said:Sutton? Ellingworth?
Gotcha.
You're blind.
Parker said:Just typing names won't convince anyone.
Parker said:Given that the lie detector tests it relies on are not credible that's a pretty safe assumption. They belong in the movies and the Jeremy Kyle show, not reality.
Correct. Cleaniness can't be proved. So, the certificate - like I said - is meaningless. It has no clout, credibility or authority. It wouldn't convince anyone of anything. They're selling pieces of A4 paper for 100 CHF.
You can believe it's some new dawn if you wish, but you're the kind of mark they're hoping to rope in.
Imagine this conversation:
Athlete: "I'm clean"
Observer: "How do I know that"
A: "I have a certificate"
O: "From whom"
A: "A lawyer in Australia"
O: "And how did you show you were clean"
A: "I did an online test and sent him 100 bucks"
O: "You're a chump. They saw you coming"
A: "No I'm not"
O: "Do you have a certificate to prove it? Cos I can get you one for 50 bucks"
A: "Deal!"
No, they worked for British Cycling.Dear Wiggo said:Oh you don't think they worked in cycling before they were at Sky?
Parker said:No, they worked for British Cycling.
Dear Wiggo said:Sutto is an Aussie. Where do you think he worked before BC?
Your key points were that this idea was at a 'futile stage' (so if it's futile, how do these certificates have any merit) and that the powers that be should invest and back it. Should they do that without criticism? Without someone pointing out that lie detectors are BS? Without people questioning if this is scam.mrhender said:As I see it you have chosen the apocalyptic stance on the subject of anti-doping.. You refuse to answer to the key points of my postings.
Yet I'am giving you the benefit of doubt by answering to your points...
Only then to see you defending Brailsford, the one name that got you posting in this thread right?
Welsh CyclingDear Wiggo said:Sutto is an Aussie. Where do you think he worked before BC?
Parker said:Now why do you think anyone should believe someone just because they have a certificate from an unheard of Australian lawyer?
Parker said:Now why do you think anyone should believe someone just because they have a certificate from an unheard of Australian lawyer?
How about you save us both more time and confusion and just tell me then.Dear Wiggo said:Is that the intent?
Or is it different?
Given I already know the answer and you clearly don't, I'll leave it for you to work out.
Parker said:How about you save us both more time and confusion and just tell me then.
So you don't know anything then. Thought so. Good night.Dear Wiggo said:Better that you work it out yourself. You won't believe an unknown Aussie poster any more than an unknown Aussie lawyer.