Clean Protocol

[mrhender]

Your key points were that this idea was at a 'futile stage' (so if it's futile, how do these certificates have any merit) and that the powers that be should invest and back it. Should they do that without criticism? Without someone pointing out that lie detectors are BS? Without people questioning if this is scam.

And as for Brailsford. He's irrelevant. You and particularly DW diverted the arguement to him as you can't display the merit this half baked scheme or even call the certificate credible in any way.

Nope... Again you are focusing only on your narrative...
Do you not agree that you have to start somewhere?
Or do you only accept the final package with ribbons and band??
If so, then there's no reason to post in this thread at all..

You mistake my reviving of this thread as an "approved clean stamp" by only reading and replying to the things you can rant about...

To be clear on your logic, you would also say in 2010 that Sky was not to be taken serious as they where in a futile state?
You twist the word futile into something that fits your condescending approach to this..
Why even bother?

 

[Dear Wiggo]

http://www.trispecific.com/fb54-clean-athletes-with-the-clean-protocol/

 

[IzzyStradlin]

And as for Brailsford. He's irrelevant. You and particularly DW diverted the arguement to him as you can't display the merit this half baked scheme or even call the certificate credible in any way.

So who/what is more credible? Who is worthy of support? Please, enlighten us.