CMS Doping in sport revelations/discussion

Page 37 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 6, 2019
10
1
1,535
The Daily Mail are no different and they were Varnish's biggest cheerleaders. And the source of the jiffy bag story.

Personally when it comes to cycling knowledge I'd pick Tom Carey above Matt Lawton
Whatndoes David Walsh say aboout this all, he was very loud with Armstrong? Or has he moved on from cycling? Not in the UK, so I have not followed him.
 
May 25, 2018
2,419
2,607
17,180
Whatndoes David Walsh say aboout this all, he was very loud with Armstrong? Or has he moved on from cycling? Not in the UK, so I have not followed him.
Walsh is quite a bit softer on Ineos than he was on Armstrong and has kinda gone quiet recently. His contemporary Kimmage from back in the Armstrong days is still going all guns blazing though
 
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
Walsh is quite a bit softer on Ineos than he was on Armstrong and has kinda gone quiet recently.
He's demanding that Freeman must "come clean on cycling’s dark arts and the ‘jiffy bag’ case". He's said recently he was disappointed by the way he allowed himself to be duped by Brailsford, but he's still standing shoulder to shoulder with Froome (they are still tied together by that ghosted autobiog).
 
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
Thinking ahead to Wednesday. O'Rourke submitted a request for GMC to make a section 35A legal application to the Daily Mail on 8th Nov for Sutton's affidavit with Lawton. This would mean by Friday 22nd they could have it.
Under the Medical Act, Daily Mail have 14 days to provide the document and failure to provide it would then mean GMC can request the County Court to obtain it using the Medical Act on their behalf.
Will Daily Mail delay the tribunal, taking it past 20th December without all the evidence O'Rourke requested for her client through the County Courts, or will they hang Sutton and reveal their jiffybag story isn't to be believed given Sutton's opposite claim under ( effective) oath to Parliament's DCMS?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pastronef
Jun 20, 2015
15,367
6,032
28,180
I fail to see how this will impact on the main issue in this case - Which is whether Freeman's behaviour has broken any rules under the GMC's Code of Conduct - The rest is all theatre.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fmk_RoI
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
Given he can only not be charged over the Testogel, if the panel decides Sutton's word is less reiable than Freeman's, I would say it is about the most important piece of evidence myself. The MPTS panel will see Sutton claiming to DCMS/Paliament nothing in the jiffybag, no wrongdoing - even taking offence at the suggestion from the DCMS there was any wrongdoing, while all along he's signed the affidavit with Lawton that the Jiffy contains Triamcinolone and the reason they are all there in the first place.

Is there a reputation to uphold for Daily Mail? Obviously Daily Mail are insured against defamation claims but Sutton won't be and if it is revealed Lawton went with a made up contents from Sutton which seems the only possible outcome if they release the affidavit to GMC, is 'that' something they will just let Sutton take the blame and absorb the embarrassment themselves, or will they want to protect their own integrity by fighting in the the Courts with Wiggins? Remember Wiggins has already stated this is with the Courts last year already. I highly doubt Wiggins himself had the power of Medical Act to force Daily Mail to release the affidavit to him though. It has ramifications far beyond Freeman & Sutton for Daily Mail imo.
 
Jun 30, 2014
248
44
9,080
Walsh is quite a bit softer on Ineos than he was on Armstrong and has kinda gone quiet recently. His contemporary Kimmage from back in the Armstrong days is still going all guns blazing though
Kimmage very rarely writes about cycling these days. His recent clinic related articles have mainly concerned rugby union.
 
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
all most the same with digger_forum once a regular here, before twitter called.
Digger and co, Twitter seems to reward their tinfoil hatted theories better. They're very much on the fringe of cycling Twitter but, echo chamber that it is, Twitter amplifies their craziness. As do FUD merchants like CT who think their conspiracy theories need to be written about Off Twitter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rick james

rick james

BANNED
Sep 2, 2014
7,677
110
12,680
Digger wants to through mud and *** yet wants to hide behind a stupid mask when on TV....plastic hard man who should have went public if he really believed what he was posting on Twitter
 
May 25, 2018
2,419
2,607
17,180
Digger wants to through mud and *** yet wants to hide behind a stupid mask when on TV....plastic hard man who should have went public if he really believed what he was posting on Twitter

Who is this Digger lad. Google threw up a few articles but nothing about who he is. Is he just a social media poster or someone who was involved in cycling?
 
May 25, 2018
2,419
2,607
17,180
Kimmage very rarely writes about cycling these days. His recent clinic related articles have mainly concerned rugby union.

I've read a few of them when Ive been able to get my hands on an Independent. As usual he has some great points but his style of mixing facts and emotion often gets in the way if him getting the points across
 
Jun 20, 2015
15,367
6,032
28,180
Sam - Freeman has already accepted 18 out of 22 charges brought forward by the GMC - He's contesting the remaining 4 charges - The testagel charge may not have to be proven for him to lose his medical licence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVFTA
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
The rest is all theatre.
And as has already been noted, O'Rourke's motives for playing the 35A card could have little to do with actually getting access to the contents of the Mail's safe. She could simply have been trying to wind Sutton up (partly, as with the doping allegation, by making clear in public what has been known/suspected in private for ages, that Sutton was the source of the Jiffy bag story). Or she could be using it as a way to derail the tribunal by forcing it to chase the Mail up the legal ladder of appeal and counter appeal. The contents of the safe - that Sutton tells porkies - is already proven. But it is also proven that Freeman tells porkies. How O'Rourke spins Peters's evidence on that regard - that neither Freeman nor Sutton can be trusted, and that the Testogel was more likely for Freeman's personal use than Sutton's - is probably more important at this stage than what is or is not in the Mail's safe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yaco and Breezy1985
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
Thinking ahead to Wednesday. O'Rourke submitted a request for GMC to make a section 35A legal application to the Daily Mail on 8th Nov for Sutton's affidavit with Lawton. This would mean by Friday 22nd they could have it.
Under the Medical Act, Daily Mail have 14 days to provide the document and failure to provide it would then mean GMC can request the County Court to obtain it using the Medical Act on their behalf.
Will Daily Mail delay the tribunal, taking it past 20th December without all the evidence O'Rourke requested for her client through the County Courts, or will they hang Sutton and reveal their jiffybag story isn't to be believed given Sutton's opposite claim under ( effective) oath to Parliament's DCMS?
Sam......ever heard the term 'web of deceit'.....once one is told...a number follow.....unless you are suggesting the Mail safe is the font of all known truths??? I wonder what else they have in there?? :D .......and, are we now beliveing 'proven' liars when they tell us they are telling the truth?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 42x16ss
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
It's funny how the Provincial Wing of BC's PR Dept think this is about the Jiffy bag, that this is somehow about disproving the Jiffy bag story. It isn't. O'Rourke simply wants to use the Jiffy bag story to say Sutton is not to be believed. But, she's since suggested there could now be "a humdinger of a debate" over whether Sutton's evidence should be struck from the record ... or whether she can introduce evidence she was going to put to him. There's the tribunal's choice, as she's trying to frame it. Kill Sutton's value (whatever it might be at this stage) to the GMC one way, or kill Sutton's value to the GMC (whatever it might be at this stage) another. She doesn't care about the Jiffy bag. No one does. Apart from the Provincial Wing of BC's PR Dept.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yaco and gillan1969
May 25, 2018
2,419
2,607
17,180
I still can't forget this one.
Mr Allardichi legend only in his own mind and Limerick FC.

But on a serious note football has been putting off a huge reckoning with drugs for a long time now. Fuentes although unreliable said he doped Spanish world cup footballers round the same time certain big Spanish clubs were posting record breaking work rates in terms of meters covered per man
 
Mar 4, 2011
3,346
451
14,580
I had a feeling he was Irish based on his twitter's about other sport. Any idea which station and when he was on Irish TV. Would love to see this mad wierdo live
Here's one of his appearances.

View: https://twitter.com/offtheball/status/1020236632090447873


Explosive revelations include:
Thomas is a better GT rider than he used to be
Sky have a strong team
The French fans boo

And he mixes Marvel & DC, which is sort of unforgivable