Catwhoorg said:
I wonder what balance of positives historically have come from medal winners versus targeted testing. Those who do fail are failing an "intelligence test" correct ?
This may be a good thing, we have to assume the authorities (UKAD in this case) know what they are doing, better to have everyone on their toes all the time than knowing exactly where and when (and who in the medal winners) gets the majority of the tests.
Given the article is about a 16 year old gold medal winning weight lifter, I am going to have to say no. They might be saying it for strategic purposes, but if you aren't testing medalists, then why bother testing at all.
Unlike cycling where doms do their job and drop out, in this instance, those guys coming 10th are not doing what they were meant to do (IMO) - ie win. The podium getters are.
Tired and thinking slow so might change my mind on this, but for individual sports, I think podium testing should be required.
16 year old Nigerian. How much money does she make picking up heavy thing?