jaylew said:What the hell are the Commonwealth games, anyway?
42x16ss said:Usually a chance for Australia to wail on the rest of the British Commonwealth at various Olympic and non Olympic sports. However England and to a lesser extent Scotland have closed the gap thanks to funding for the London Olympics and AIS budgets being reduced.
Pricey_sky said:You've never heard of the commonwealth?
It is an association of 53 countries the head of which is our Queen, the commonwealth games are a mini Olympics featuring these 53 nations. Most athletes find the commonwealth games quite a bid deal, obviously for outsiders it doesn't mean a lot.
jaylew said:So, I'm assuming it's pretty much former British colonies, but if that's the case, why no US?
1776 was rather a long time ago, though. The Commonwealth Games started as the Empire Games in 1930 - the USA was, of course, long gone by then.jaylew said:So, I'm assuming it's pretty much former British colonies, but if that's the case, why no US?
Thanks, good post. I wonder why Rwanda and Mozambique applied?Catwhoorg said:They chose not to associate. I think specifically politically there is an issue in recognizing the monarch as the head of the body. (Though it will not necessarily pass down to Charles and his successors, it seems likely that this will be the case)
It would be interesting if they chose to apply. I think a couple of the benefits of the Commonwealth as a body is that its diverse group, and not dominated by the US.
There are 71 nations at the games, more than have a seat at the Commonwealth of nations proper, due to Crown protectorates, and administered territories sending their own teams.
There are two open applications to join (Somaliland and South Sudan), and Suriname is in the advanced stages of applying.
Rwanda and Mozambique are the only two nations in the Commonwealth without significant ties to the Britsih Empire/UK. Both were admitted under exceptional circumstances clauses.
oldcrank said:The following article may help explain why
some Americans do not understand what
the Commonwealth Games are. Of course,
it could also be the American education
system/curriculum, or a combination of
the two (and perhaps other) factors.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-d-chalmers/the-great-american-passpo_b_1920287.html
Catwhoorg said:Something like the gymnastics, well England sweeping a host of medals, shows how strong a field that is. Team GB got 1 medal in 2012, and will be hard pushed to get 1-2 in Rio.
I agree with this. I like them because it's just fun. None of stress and BS that surrounds so much sport. It really has a back to basics feel to it. It's almost what the Olympics was probably like before I was born. People just doing sport because they enjoy it.Pricey_sky said:To be honest I like the games, as a sports fan it's great to see another competition featuring some of the worlds best. It's much more chilled out than the Olympics but is still great experience for the athletes and for many a commonwealth gold is a massive achievement.
Catwhoorg said:
Pricey_sky said:To be honest I like the games, as a sports fan it's great to see another competition featuring some of the worlds best. It's much more chilled out than the Olympics but is still great experience for the athletes and for many a commonwealth gold is a massive achievement.
JRTK73 said:People still go out to watch the Football Championship in England even though it is a second division. If you enjoy the sports on offer and enjoy watching your country compete then it shouldn't matter.