Comprehensive Climbers Ranking

Page 18 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Feb 7, 2026
162
242
730
Thanks to your question @Ulle97 I have finally been able to motivate myself enough to analyze all the Giro ascensions on Etna since 2011. The reason I hesitated so long is that I knew there had never been a great performance and that they literally use a different side of the mountain every single time.
It is really annoying to have to look up different segment details every single time.

The best performance was (as expected) Contador in 2011, but only with an Index of 71. All the other ascents were Indexes in the 60s with either a late attacker or a group arrival.

I have to agree with Red Rick and hayneplane. The main reasons for the small gaps there is the early position in the race and the fact that there is often no strong favourite in the Giro (and shallow gradient + some headwind)
 
  • Like
Reactions: hayneplane
Feb 20, 2012
54,535
45,097
28,180
IIRC Contadors attack on Etna was like 16 minutes at 6.4W/kg, which was pretty good at that moment in time. It was before that they were really slow
 
Feb 7, 2026
162
242
730
IIRC Contadors attack on Etna was like 16 minutes at 6.4W/kg, which was pretty good at that moment in time. It was before that they were really slow
Yes, the attack looked quite strong. But unless it is a monumental attack, I normally only analyze the whole climb and the pacing on Etna is always pedestrian.
 
Apr 30, 2011
48,266
30,804
28,180
i think its worth segmenting climbs when it better helps you infer the capacity of the riders

but i guess its very hard to evaluate precisely how much pacing matters
 
Feb 7, 2026
162
242
730
i think its worth segmenting climbs when it better helps you infer the capacity of the riders

but i guess its very hard to evaluate precisely how much pacing matters
I have segmented some climbs of course. As I said, unless it is a monumental attack, the Index for the whole climb is almost always higher than just for the attack. Exceptions for this are for example Vingegaard on Tourmalet in 2023 and Pogacar on Foscagno in 2024.

On first glance, Contador's attack seems to have been around 6.2 w/kg for 15+ minutes. Not that good, but it could be more as I did not check it very thoroughly.
 
Apr 30, 2011
48,266
30,804
28,180
I have segmented some climbs of course. As I said, unless it is a monumental attack, the Index for the whole climb is almost always higher than just for the attack. Exceptions for this are for example Vingegaard on Tourmalet in 2023 and Pogacar on Foscagno in 2024.

On first glance, Contador's attack seems to have been around 6.2 w/kg for 15+ minutes. Not that good, but it could be more as I did not check it very thoroughly.
to analyse it properly , youd need to take all segments into account

vingegaards attack on tourmalet was a much stronger performance than if the climb had only started in la mongie

thus one needs to have some model for how much the overall pacing affected the average
 
Feb 7, 2026
162
242
730
to analyse it properly , youd need to take all segments into account

vingegaards attack on tourmalet was a much stronger performance than if the climb had only started in la mongie

thus one needs to have some model for how much the overall pacing affected the average
Of course I take in to account that the riders have climbed already at a certain pace before. But I do cap the maximum adjustment for that at some point and the way I do it is not completely scientifc.

The uncertainty and the effort required also go way up if you start segmenting a lot, so I only do it for some famous performances. I would be happy if someone managed to create a real model, but I imagine that would be very difficult and probably only possible by relying on Strava data, which many top riders do not publish (with power).

(My own calculations are mostly based on video timing and analysis. The videos often cut away from the main group causing you to miss something, sometimes there are also no clear geographical features that let you determine the exact location in the middle of a climb etc.)
 
Last edited:
Apr 30, 2011
48,266
30,804
28,180
yep i also imagine that its very difficult to do so accurately ( maybe to a degree such that its a futile exercise )

i think a starting point could be two segments , as you often have a negative split before a strong attack . in that scenario the attack is usually full throttle and a pretty good test for capacity when the full context is taken into account
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peyresourde
Feb 7, 2026
162
242
730
Chris Froome | 73 (-6): 6.7 W/kg for 18:33 on Jabal Al Akhdhar (Oman 2014)
Nairo Quintana | 69 (-5): 6.57 W/kg for 18:36 on Jabal Al Akhdhar (Oman 2026)

The Froome performance was actually pretty good, especially for being in February. A similar level to Yates and Scaroni this year.

Quintana was in half decent shape in Oman, but clearly much worse than some years ago (2022 or especially 2020). Quintana also often peaks in February when he is still fresh. His level did not totally fall off the cliff like Froome's. But the combination of him getting worse and the field getting better is still bad for his results, obviously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pozzovivo
Feb 20, 2012
54,535
45,097
28,180
Chris Froome | 73 (-6): 6.7 W/kg for 18:33 on Jabal Al Akhdhar (Oman 2014)
Nairo Quintana | 69 (-5): 6.57 W/kg for 18:36 on Jabal Al Akhdhar (Oman 2026)

The Froome performance was actually pretty good, especially for being in February. A similar level to Yates and Scaroni this year.

Quintana was in half decent shape in Oman, but clearly much worse than some years ago (2022 or especially 2020). Quintana also often peaks in February when he is still fresh. His level did not totally fall off the cliff like Froome's. But the combination of him getting worse and the field getting better is still bad for his results, obviously.
Both were unipuerto, which should make them easiest to compare, but it was raced at 46kph average in 2026 compared to 38kph average in 2014.

I think overall the effect of average watts in a calm peloton going up is one of the more difficult things to estimate the effect of
 
Feb 7, 2026
162
242
730
Both were unipuerto, which should make them easiest to compare, but it was raced at 46kph average in 2026 compared to 38kph average in 2014.

I think overall the effect of average watts in a calm peloton going up is one of the more difficult things to estimate the effect of
Yeah, that is impossible for me to estimate, especially since it is also different from rider to rider depending on their location in the peloton and their efficiency in moving through it.

The 2014 edition also had a bit more elevation gain, but I did ding it slightly harder because of the low average speed. In general, I rate all stages of similar length about the same if they are flat, regardless of the average speed (except for very big differences in speed like here or if there is echelon action).
 

TRENDING THREADS