D-Queued said:
You seem to have whipped yourself into a bit of a frenzy here.
This is more about sporting rules than law.
There are suspensions, not sentences.
That is semantics. I think most people including the cyclists themselves would say that it does feel as sentence or punishment. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, logic dictates that ...
Doping has long been out of control, which is why WADA was created. Cycling is the Typhoid Mary that led to WADA.
You don't have to cycle. If you want to, you have to agree to follow the rules.
Perhaps you don't have a UCI license, but I do. It says, "The holder is subject to the Regulatations of the UCI and accepts any drug and blood tests for which they provide as well as the exclusive competence of the CAS."
I signed that license just like Aldirto had to sign his.
Do you have much choice if you chosen profession is cycling and your major or perhaps even only talent is being a very good cyclist? You don't need to answer that, by the way, Pedro Horillo did a much better job o fthat than any of us could ever hope to do.
If you don't like the system, then get involved. Do the research and submit papers. This is how new tests are accepted, for example.
There is a regular process to review the rules and standards. Thus far, it does not appear that there have been many good arguments put forth with respect to some sort of world epidemic of accidental Clenbuterol contamination.
Who knows, perhaps I will, perhaps I am. However that is neither here nor there. This is forum in which to discuss cycling matters and that is what I am doing. If everybody on here expressing a strong view can only do that if they get involved, it will get very quiet here.
If it were something that you were a bit more familiar with (i.e. you have heard about it before), like Uranium, which is a naturally occuring substance, would you be comfortable with simple detection and no allowable limit?
It is not just that is is naturally occurring, it is whether it is possible to get contaminated accidentally. For clen it is, although not epidemic and there are numerous cases showing it can happen. That can't be said for all naturally occurring substances, like for example Uranium. And no I am not okay with no allowable limit for substances that can be ingested accidentally and/or unknowingly, at least not below certain thresholds.
Regards
GJ