palmerq said:
Now to be fair to Andy Schleck, I think it i quite obvious to everyone that he was holding back on mont ventoux and he could have left every but contador behind if he didnt want to get franck on the podium, therefore he probably would have stuck more time in armstrong(infact I dont think albertos attacks stopped armstrong finishing ahead of schleck :S) and klodi, and he still would have been 2nd. Infact I am quite sure that klodi would still have been pretty far away from Schleck by the end, with or with out contadors attacks, which weren´t unreasonable attempts ...
I don´t see what the big deal is about this half attack, well I think do :S
I agree there is no big deal. Peronally I think AC made a dumb move on that day, but so what, riders all make mistakes and it didn't affect the outcome from his perspective or the teams perspective, so why overanalyse it.
In terms of Ventoux. It was obvious that AC and Andy could have ridden away from the others had they wanted to. For various reasons they didn't which I'm sure made at least Garate a happy man and good on him for a great ride. In terms of the rest, clearly Armstrong was the strongest up the climb at the end of the day by the simple fact that he rode Frank and Wiggo of his wheel, which in my experience of racing tends to indicate that he was riding better than the guys behind
😉 Does this mean LA is a better climber than Frank? On the day he was, on another day the situation may be reversed. Unfortunately, with racing you don't get reruns you just get to suck it up and move on.
Just wish some on here would.