- Jul 1, 2009
- 226
- 0
- 0
Publicus said:That's what happened today--the Schlecks counter-attacked Sastre's initial attack and then all hell broke loose. Contador was covering attacks and riding wheels. Kloden wasn't setting tempo for him or chasing down attacks. He was just riding AC's wheel . . . until he couldn't. It's unfortunate and the kid clearly feels bad, but this attempt to indict him is getting ridiculous. I don't recall ANYONE suggesting that Lance hold his fire or take into consideration Azevedo's or Landis' podium potential when making decisions on the road.
No indictment vis a vis the podium here. I see it as a matter of holding the yellow jersey, not the podium. If any other team had the MJ, do you think they'd care about the podium? That's an unimportant subplot.
Alberto's "sin" (so to speak) was putting what he's earned (and the team has too) in danger unnecessarily, that's all.
We'll never know, but looking back, it seemed the attacks at 1.7 km to go over the top were over. Kloden may have held on or at least been closer --- to help AC if something went wrong on the descent. With Kloden pedaling squares, they should have sat on and stayed quiet.
Want an indictment? Riis should have thought it or the Schlecks should have seen losing Kloden as an opportunity, both for the danger to Contador or podium positions vs. Lance and Wig. Only, lucky for them, Alberto beat them to it.
Anyone remember Lance's famous 2003 "dehydration" ITT (finished all white mouthed). The next day Ulrich and his team didn't really hit Lance until the Bonascre at the very end, a lost opportunity. Lance masked well his weakness that whole day (lost only 8 seconds or so) to recover and slaughter everyone on Luz Ardiden 2 days later. Bianchi should have laid it all on the line the day after the ITT, but let Lance off the mat.
Moral: hit 'em and isolate when they are weaker. I didn't see that from Riis and was surprised.
