• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Contador Stage Antics

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
scribe said:
I can understand why some of you guys think Contador should be in the picture alone. Let's not get all riled up over not much about nothing. :D

It's hard to get worked up about something like this. But I'd say by your willful obtuseness that you are doing your best to try and get something started. Hopefully it works out for you.
 
Aug 25, 2009
397
0
0
Visit site
Publicus said:
It's hard to get worked up about something like this. But I'd say by your willful obtuseness that you are doing your best to try and get something started. Hopefully it works out for you.

So when are you gonna admit you were wrong to me pal. LOL. Internet know it alls, can't even admit a mistake on minor points, no hope for them on the major. Sad.

As to this thread, 6 pages on basically nothing. Quite impressive :D
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
progressor said:
Well of course if it was LA, it would be a d-bag. But as it's contador, what can you say except more kudos to the saint. Remember if you don't hate LA to extreme - you're a *** fanboy. If you hate LA and love AC - you're an intelligent realist. I've learnt so much here.

Self actualization always makes me tear up...I am just so proud of you little dude!
 
progressor said:
So when are you gonna admit you were wrong to me pal. LOL. Internet know it alls, can't even admit a mistake on minor points, no hope for them on the major. Sad.

As to this thread, 6 pages on basically nothing. Quite impressive :D

I've got no problem admitting that I am wrong. What have I been wrong about? You replied to my comment talking about LA when I hadn't said a single word about him. Then you listed a bunch of comments from other people. Which goes back to my earlier point . . . I hadn't said anything about LA.

Perhaps you should admit you replied to the wrong comment and just move on.
 
Aug 25, 2009
397
0
0
Visit site
Publicus said:
I've got no problem admitting that I am wrong. What have I been wrong about? You replied to my comment talking about LA when I hadn't said a single word about him. Then you listed a bunch of comments from other people. Which goes back to my earlier point . . . I hadn't said anything about LA.

Perhaps you should admit you replied to the wrong comment and just move on.

My first post was in response to you post
you replied
Publicus said:
Even when no one is talking about LA, you are apparently thinking about LA. That makes you a *** fanboy.

I proved that false. If I'm a *** fanboy, and I proved you wrong so effortlessly, where does that leave you? :eek::p
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
progressor said:
My first post was in response to you post
you replied


I proved that false. If I'm a *** fanboy, and I proved you wrong so effortlessly, where does that leave you? :eek::p

Still not a *** fanboy like you?
 
Aug 25, 2009
397
0
0
Visit site
Couple of members of the tag team have to join in, and add nothing. Theres a surprise:rolleyes:. Hey TFF oh starving one, Could you please explain the legal definition of Hearsay for me again, and again, and again.......?:eek:
 
progressor said:
My first post was in response to you post
you replied


I proved that false. If I'm a *** fanboy, and I proved you wrong so effortlessly, where does that leave you? :eek::p

When I said no one, I was speaking about myself. Again, you were replying to my comment, why would I respond in defense of anyone else since your allegation was directed at me?
 
progressor said:
Couple of members of the tag team have to join in, and add nothing. Theres a surprise:rolleyes:. Hey TFF oh starving one, Could you please explain the legal definition of Hearsay for me again, and again, and again.......?:eek:

Good strategy, when you feel yourself really going down the toilet bring up a long past victory that someone else enjoyed over one of your tormentors.
And I don't include myself in that group. I was just trying to stop you before you embarass yourself any more. I hate to watch that.
 
Aug 25, 2009
397
0
0
Visit site
Publicus said:
When I said no one, I was speaking about myself. Again, you were replying to my comment, why would I respond in defense of anyone else since your allegation was directed at me?

Since when does someone say no one when referring only to themselves? Stop spinning.
 
progressor said:
Since when does someone say no one when referring only to themselves? Stop spinning.

Seriously, isn't it past your bed time? I don't have the interest in wasting any more time demonstrating to you that you don't know what you are talking about or giving you grammar lessons. Move along junior.
 
Aug 25, 2009
397
0
0
Visit site
Hugh Januss said:
Good strategy, when you feel yourself really going down the toilet bring up a long past victory that someone else enjoyed over one of your tormentors.
And I don't include myself in that group. I was just trying to stop you before you embarass yourself any more. I hate to watch that.

You actually think that's what it's all about? Is that why you disagree with someone - so you can 'win'. I suspect that's why so many people refuse to admit they're wrong on the web, ego and misplaced competiveness. Go re-read some of your mates TFF's posts with all the condescension, and negative comments about so many other posters intelligence and figure out why I might refer back to that thread.
 
Jul 23, 2009
2,891
1
0
Visit site
progressor said:
You actually think that's what it's all about? Is that why you disagree with someone - so you can 'win'. I suspect that's why so many people refuse to admit they're wrong on the web, ego and misplaced competiveness. Go re-read some of your mates TFF's posts with all the condescension, and negative comments about so many other posters intelligence and figure out why I might refer back to that thread.

There was a pearl of wisdom in the last line of Hugh's post.
 
Jun 16, 2009
19,654
2
0
Visit site
3 months after the tour & LA and AC feud their are threads going on strong about it. If AC went on the stage and got a few extra photos good for him. He's won 2 tdf's and is superior to most of the rest so i think if he wanted to get some extra photos well good on him. The reporters and photographers want lots of him. i think their is some better topics to talk about like Cadel Evans' WC Win :D(joking).
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
auscyclefan94 said:
3 months after the tour & LA and AC feud their are threads going on strong about it. If AC went on the stage and got a few extra photos good for him. He's won 2 tdf's and is superior to most of the rest so i think if he wanted to get some extra photos well good on him. The reporters and photographers want lots of him. i think their is some better topics to talk about like Cadel Evans' WC Win :D(joking).

Now there's something we agree on again...

As for the thread, an interesting 65 posts worth :rolleyes:

Good on AC, he was very polite to let Andy walk through first, and then obliged the reporter's request of one last photo, even though it was obvious he was a bit over it. Very polite AC.

And someone said Andy looked stoned - +1 on that, I wish I was as relaxed as him if I was the biggest up and coming stage race talent at that young age.
 
Funny how threads visited by Progressor always fail to progress.

Fancy bringing up old stuff.

Interesting that, at the photo shoot, the media wanted that final shot of Contador, alone and not Armstrong.
Someone around here said Bertie was nothing, compared to Lance.:eek:
Seems the press also now disagree.:rolleyes:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
progressor said:
You actually think that's what it's all about? Is that why you disagree with someone - so you can 'win'. I suspect that's why so many people refuse to admit they're wrong on the web, ego and misplaced competiveness. Go re-read some of your mates TFF's posts with all the condescension, and negative comments about so many other posters intelligence and figure out why I might refer back to that thread.

Look, I know it is hard to accept my complete superiority in IQ, but I am sure you are good at something. I'll bet you can wipe and not even leave any toilet paper behind. I'll bet you can cook soup in a microwave. Heck, I'll bet you can even eat it without the bib now!

And again, I am super happy that you have actually recognized what you are, and admitted it here. You keep it up little fella!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
progressor said:
Couple of members of the tag team have to join in, and add nothing. Theres a surprise:rolleyes:. Hey TFF oh starving one, Could you please explain the legal definition of Hearsay for me again, and again, and again.......?:eek:

...and hearsay doesn't need to be capitalized.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Bluebeard said:
Progressor was right to capitalise Hear'Say, if, as I think, he refers to this, a metaphoric reference to something or other.

..oh, well I stand corrected. However, watching that made me vomit, so you owe me a new chair for my computer desk.:)