The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Moose McKnuckles said:Better yet, throw him in the water and see if he floats!
I've always been partial to trial by fire. Make him hold a red hot iron bar in his hands. If he's burned, he's guilty. If he's innocent Lance, er, I mean God, will protect him.Moose McKnuckles said:Better yet, throw him in the water and see if he floats!
sagard said:Of course 61% is good enough. We already shown that the 99.999% of the livestock in Spain being clean wasn't what we are looking for, so let's go with the 61%.
LaFlorecita said:You forgot that 97% of the livestock isn't tested, and farmers who use illegal hormones usually know the tricks to circumvent the tests.
LaFlorecita said:You forgot that 97% of the livestock isn't tested, and farmers who use illegal hormones usually know the tricks to circumvent the tests.
Benotti69 said:so why have not seen a lot of positives for minutes traces of clen in europe?
Havetts said:[citation needed].
Moose McKnuckles said:Better yet, throw him in the water and see if he floats!
Havetts said:[citation needed].
Moose McKnuckles said:Small number of tests + small amounts + few places that can detect such trace amounts = few positives
LaFlorecita said:Read it somewhere, maybe even in the resolution of his case...
Cloxxki said:So the chance that he can beat the test is 40%. If you'd have 3 defendants, and they'd all have themselves tested, at least one would find it advantageous to use it for their defence. Hmmm....
Why wouldn't the Vuelta test for clen?Benotti69 said:Did this years 3 GTs not test for clen, well i doubt the Vuelta did, but the others?
LaFlorecita said:You forgot that 97% of the livestock isn't tested, and farmers who use illegal hormones usually know the tricks to circumvent the tests.
That's cool.DirtyWorks said:Nothing personal, this is a pet peeve of mine. The chances are much greater than 40% he can beat the test because the false positive and false negative rates are not zero.
It is worth repeating, a 60% success rate is awful. Dr. Nick from the Simpsons and Dr. Spaceman from 30 Rock have better results.
hrotha said:Why wouldn't the Vuelta test for clen?
IIRC clen is part of the standard tests - ie. you don't need to be testing specifically for clen to find its traces, if they exist.
I do not know per se, but I remember (hence the IIRC which acknowledges I could be wrong) reading that clen is checked in every test. I probably read it in the wake of the announcement of Contador's positive.DirtyWorks said:How do you know the test was done? If I am not mistaken, the outside world does not know the testing protocols at any given race nor do we know who is paying for testing and who is carrying out the testing until way too late.
We know whomever pays for testing gets to pick tests. We don't know any more than that. I'd like to be wrong about this. Please correct me if I am wrong.
DirtyWorks said:This bears no resemblance to the truth about the EU meat supply. Where did you get this 3% magic number? That's quite a bit of meat to test. That's why it's at minimum a misquote.
The meat supply is very clean in the EU. If it wasn't there would have been numerous clenbuterol positives and MAJOR meat industry investigations. Exactly like what just happened in Mexico only the regulators have much more influence in the EU.
It's time to accept the meat explanation is a lie to cover clenbuterol use at some point in Pharmador's training.
roundabout said:Contador has already taken a polygraph test.
http://www.tu.tv/videos/alberto-contador-y-miguel-angel-revilla
50 seconds into this video.