Still rehashing this almost 3 months after, might as well join the fun. Only question that is relevant, who were the best 2 riders in the race. Contador & Schleck and they were well in front of all the rest. Astana were not going to get a podium sweep, period. In 20 years of follwing cycling, I never heard such a fuss about somebody who might have had a shot at finishing 3rd in the Tour, just goes to show how boring that race was.
Ifs and buts are all we hear on the Contador attack that dropped Kloeden, well using that logic, IF Contador and Schleck had went at it on the Ventoux, they would have left the rest in the dust and Andy would still have been second so forget Kloeden already, he couldnt even follow a minor acceleration, did he deserve a podium place, no.
We have also learned post-Tour that Astana were divided & giving very little support to Contador so he hardly owed them anything. The one recurring theme I have heard since the Tour is a lot of fans who had previously repsected or liked Lance changed their mind due to his childish antics at the Tour. Didnt hear anyone say they admired Lance more because of his behaviour. But you know what, well before the Tour started,April, May we had a debate on what was going to happen at the Tour and a lot of us on here agreed Lance/Bruyneel/Astana would try to screw Contador at every opportunity which is exactly what happened, just check back through the threads.
There should only ever have been one leader at Astana and that was Contador, at Postal the minute Leipheimer finished on the podium at the the Vuelta, he left, why? Postal had guys like Heras, Landis and Hamilton who won GTs or at the least challenged but I never once heard it mentioned that they would try to get a clean sweep at the Tour even though it was very possible. Why?
Ifs and buts are all we hear on the Contador attack that dropped Kloeden, well using that logic, IF Contador and Schleck had went at it on the Ventoux, they would have left the rest in the dust and Andy would still have been second so forget Kloeden already, he couldnt even follow a minor acceleration, did he deserve a podium place, no.
We have also learned post-Tour that Astana were divided & giving very little support to Contador so he hardly owed them anything. The one recurring theme I have heard since the Tour is a lot of fans who had previously repsected or liked Lance changed their mind due to his childish antics at the Tour. Didnt hear anyone say they admired Lance more because of his behaviour. But you know what, well before the Tour started,April, May we had a debate on what was going to happen at the Tour and a lot of us on here agreed Lance/Bruyneel/Astana would try to screw Contador at every opportunity which is exactly what happened, just check back through the threads.
There should only ever have been one leader at Astana and that was Contador, at Postal the minute Leipheimer finished on the podium at the the Vuelta, he left, why? Postal had guys like Heras, Landis and Hamilton who won GTs or at the least challenged but I never once heard it mentioned that they would try to get a clean sweep at the Tour even though it was very possible. Why?