Chomsky said:
What neither the haters or the lovers fail to realize or admit is that both Contador and LA can be bad guys. The haters refuse to believe Contador's attack was wrong even though it was also directed at Levi and Kloeden because of their hatred of LA. The Lovers refuse to admit any fault of LA.
There are some outright lovers and haters on this forum, but most seem to weigh their arguments rather than be blinded by their love or hate.
Chomsky said:
LA, Kloeden and Levi covered all attacks for him as well as pulled AC up the hill. Nice payback.
Kloden and Levi are there as super-domestiques. It is their job to pull Lance and Contador up the hill, protect him, and cover counterattacks. He paid them back very nicely by making time on his rivals. There is still two weeks to go, so no matter how unlikely I wouldn't by counting out the likes of Schleck, Sastre and Evans yet. And yes, Lance is a rival, probably the biggest rival. Lance played a good super-domestique role as well once Contador made his break. At the start of the TdF, Bruyneel and Armstrong basically said may the strongest man win. Contador was showing his strength and Lance did the right thing in covering potential counterattacks.
Chomsky said:
Taking advantage of defenseless rivals is not how one wins a bike race. There is no excuse for that.
To make it even worse he did this against team orders.
One does not have to love LA to realize what Contador did was very wrong.
This incident really said nothing about whether LA is a good guy or bad guy but it certainly sheds some light on the character or lack of character of AC.
Totally disagree. From Bruyneel's quotes before the stage and afterwards, there is no evidence that Contador was acting against team orders:
1. "The stage decided who was the strongest. This morning, we didn't give any specific instructions. I just told them [Contador and Armstrong] to talk to each other, and do what they have to do. Alberto was strong; he is a great climber and there are three summit finishes at this Tour. So this was one of his possibilities today."
2. “We didn’t have a specific plan to attack, our plan was to maintain our collective strength first and wait for attacks from the others. Alberto counter-attacked after an attack, our plan had been for the riders to communicate and respond. I had no race radio at that time or TV, so it was something they decided themselves."
The only evidence that Contador went against team orders is what Lance said after the stage, which directly contradicts Bruyneel's statements from yesterday. It seems Lance is the odd one out when all the quotes are considered together.
So, based on Bruyneel's quotes, there were no team orders and Contador did what a team leader should do - increase time in order to win the overall. He was not wrong, he did not attack defenseless riders, and he showed his fighting character.
I'm still waiting for an answer as to why Contador should roll over and give this title to Lance without a fight - anyone?