Re: Re:
Wiggo, the only dishonesty is your intellectual dishonesty with your vacuous checklist, none of which have anything to do with the argument you raised. That argument was,
"As for legal stuff, it's pretty simple: the side with the most money wins"
You raised this bogus argument not me. You made the stupid comment, not me. Your response is so juvenile that it is apparent my observation of your ignorant simplistic comments have hit the nail on the head.
Maybe the next time you comment about something you know nothing about you will admit it.
Dear Wiggo said:RobbieCanuck said:Dear Wiggo said:Rigozzi is almost guaranteed to do a good job at the UCI given his friendship with Zorzolli.
As for legal stuff, it's pretty simple: the side with the most money wins.
Sorry Wiggo, you have that wrong. There are a lot of really good and successful lawyers who would not fall into the big billing category. Your view is the commonly encountered one from some laypeople: an ill-informed, simplistic and naïve understanding of the profession. (I wanted to use the word ignorant but I was trying to be polite!)
Nicely put dishonest argument. Just what I have come to expect. Let's see...
strawman / changing the subject: check
name calling: check
citing irrelevant facts: check
vagueness: check
stereotyping: check
My resume's bigger than yours: check
accusing opponent of being "simplistic": check
mockery: check
Wiggo, the only dishonesty is your intellectual dishonesty with your vacuous checklist, none of which have anything to do with the argument you raised. That argument was,
"As for legal stuff, it's pretty simple: the side with the most money wins"
You raised this bogus argument not me. You made the stupid comment, not me. Your response is so juvenile that it is apparent my observation of your ignorant simplistic comments have hit the nail on the head.
Maybe the next time you comment about something you know nothing about you will admit it.