I find it strange that America is one of the first countries to develop an anti-body test for COVID19, yet took forever to find a testing kit for infected COVID19 patients.
Not strange at all—and well documented that many university labs were virtually pleading the federal CDC agency to go ahead with developing testing, which they were amply capable of doing, but the CDC insisted on keeping control of that process even after they realized they had f$@ked up their own response in multiple ways. Hope someone can press criminal charges against them.I find it strange that America is one of the first countries to develop an anti-body test for COVID19, yet took forever to find a testing kit for infected COVID19 patients.
Not strange at all—and well documented that many university labs were virtually pleading the federal CDC agency to go ahead with developing testing, which they were amply capable of doing, but the CDC insisted on keeping control of that process even after they realized they had f$@ked up their own response in multiple ways. Hope someone can press criminal charges against them.
Ah, Idaho. Politically a nation apart even among western states. Was a grad student at U. of I. In the mid-1990s, and while Moscow (ID) was an extremely atypical community, traveling to towns elsewhere in the state was always eye-opener. A school buddy who worked for the forest service during the summer described how he would NEVER, ever, wear his U.S. Forest Service uniform into town, even if just to go shopping or fill up on gas. And they had to frequently replace the USFS Ranger Station sign outside their headquarters because locals would quickly shoot it full of holes each time they put up a new one. The local congresswoman, Helen Chenoweth, was a big believer in “black helicopters” (supposedly feds) spying on locals.I'm concerned about the restlessness growing in Idaho (other less populated areas are the same it sounds like). I get it that our overall numbers are low (deaths and tested infected), and I get it that some people, well, don't get it. My biggest concern is political leaders who don't get it. Fortunately our governor extended the stay at home order through April despite pressure from his own party (that's not a political discussion, just identifying facts). That set off a storm of BS that is going to really rile up the rebels and stir up those who were on the edge. I think that the precautions have helped, but maybe we will find out the hard what happens next...
There were already issues in Michigan today, so... yeah. Expect that to happen relatively soon. The more effective the countermeasures were, the more people there will be that will think they were unnecessary and overblown.I'm concerned about the restlessness growing in Idaho (other less populated areas are the same it sounds like). I get it that our overall numbers are low (deaths and tested infected), and I get it that some people, well, don't get it. My biggest concern is political leaders who don't get it. Fortunately our governor extended the stay at home order through April despite pressure from his own party (that's not a political discussion, just identifying facts). That set off a storm of BS that is going to really rile up the rebels and stir up those who were on the edge. I think that the precautions have helped, but maybe we will find out the hard what happens next...
Not a lot has changed since you were here. I grew up in Priest River, but have lived in Boise for 25 years. Boise isn't a 'nation apart' , but like you said, you don't have to drive far to fall off. Do you remember the bumper stickers "Can Helen, Not Salmon"?Ah, Idaho. Politically a nation apart even among western states. Was a grad student at U. of I. In the mid-1990s, and while Moscow (ID) was an extremely atypical community, traveling to towns elsewhere in the state was always eye-opener. A school buddy who worked for the forest service during the summer described how he would NEVER, ever, wear his U.S. Forest Service uniform into town, even if just to go shopping or fill up on gas. And they had to frequently replace the USFS Ranger Station sign outside their headquarters because locals would quickly shoot it full of holes each time they put up a new one. The local congresswoman, Helen Chenoweth, was a big believer in “black helicopters” (supposedly feds) spying on locals.
Why don't people understand that maybe the reason we have low numbers is because we are taking precautions?There were already issues in Michigan today, so... yeah. Expect that to happen relatively soon. The more effective the countermeasures were, the more people there will be that will think they were unnecessary and overblown.
That was actually a good write-up by Passan. It doesn't sound like the Cellex test if it only takes 10 min. There are many diagnostics being made, so it will be interesting to see which one they used. I imagine the pre-print will be up within a week or two.
There were already issues in Michigan today,
I do think Whitmer is overdoing it. People aren't supposed to leave their homes, it's April, what could millions of people do that would give them some pleasure (maybe even put a little food on the table) without leaving their property? Plant a garden! And Whitmer says, no, you can't do that, that's not essential. Toilet paper isn't essential, either.
I get Whitmer's logic. You close off large gardening supply areas of stores, and you prevent a little spreading of the virus that would occur from people congregating in these areas. But it seems to me that you have to balance this against the great value of gardening to many people mostly confined to their homes. It's a reminder that some things that have always gone on can still go on.
Didn't garden centers get closed because too many people were using them as social gathering spots? I might have my states confused...I would think it will be out very soon. Someone will know the main results by the weekend. The 10,000 subjects means that there will be enough positives to have a reasonably low range of uncertainty. The questionnaire assures us that all the people who test positive who also tested positive for the virus will be identified, which means we can estimate the proportion of asymptomatics (or at least people whose symptoms weren't strong enough to prompt them to get tested). We may also get some insight into where people may have picked up the virus.
I do think Whitmer is overdoing it. People aren't supposed to leave their homes, it's April, what could millions of people do that would give them some pleasure (maybe even put a little food on the table) without leaving their property? Plant a garden! And Whitmer says, no, you can't do that, that's not essential. Toilet paper isn't essential, either.
I get Whitmer's logic. You close off large gardening supply areas of stores, and you prevent a little spreading of the virus that would occur from people congregating in these areas. But it seems to me that you have to balance this against the great value of gardening to many people mostly confined to their homes. It's a reminder that some things that have always gone on can still go on.
And confederate flags. Yep. Passionate gardeners.Somehow I doubt those folks with MAGA caps and assault rifles were protesting gardening restrictions.
From a Spanish point of view, it's amazing to see so many people not giving a damn about the lockdown, flocking to public parks or talking about how people in their countries can't possibly be expected to stay home. Puts the whole "undisciplined southern Europeans" trope into perspective, really.
I just watched an interview with an understandably tearful woman who's hair/nail salon is closed as non essential. Several times she said: "this is my livelihood". I'm sure that she isn't alone, and millions of people could have given a similar interview. I couldn't help but thinking though, is your livelihood worth dying for? I know that's extreme, but are they thinking big picture? The stress makes it tough to think clearly for sure.
This is one reason the plans to end social distancing are so grim: Not only do they suggest that some level of social distancing will be needed for the next year or so (until a vaccine or a similarly effective treatment is widely available) — which we don’t know if the country can sustain — but they call for a level of surveillance and testing the US simply hasn’t shown the ability and willingness to build and manage yet.
I lived in Minnesota for many years, and always began planting a garden in April. You can plant root vegetables like carrots, radishes, and beets, and leafy ones like spinach and lettuce before the last frost. Then in May you can plant warm weather veggies like tomatoes, squash, beans, corn, and the like. Except for corn, these are usually begun in pots indoors before then, though.
The Administration's plan to re-open part of the economy, possibly in May, depends on ramped up testing--at least 500,000 a day--and according to this analysis, the U.S. is nowhere near having the capacity to do that:
https://www.vox.com/2020/4/15/21222029/coronavirus-trump-plan-reopen-economy-end-social-distancing
My point is that people are either willing to risk illness/death to go back to work, or they aren't putting it together that their livelihood could be the end of their livelihood.The reason given here for closing hair/nail salons and massage places is because you can't adhere to social distancing by the nature of the business. However here garden centers are open and you can start planting things, but I'm farther south.
Hardware stores are open in Michigan for curbside delivery and gardening is not banned in Michigan. There is no reason to protest for gardening. It is resentment pure and simple.I lived in Minnesota for many years, and always began planting a garden in April. You can plant root vegetables like carrots, radishes, and beets, and leafy ones like spinach and lettuce before the last frost. Then in May you can plant warm weather veggies like tomatoes, squash, beans, corn, and the like. Except for corn, these are usually begun in pots indoors before then, though.
The Administration's plan to re-open part of the economy, possibly in May, depends on ramped up testing--at least 500,000 a day--and according to this analysis, the U.S. is nowhere near having the capacity to do that:
https://www.vox.com/2020/4/15/21222029/coronavirus-trump-plan-reopen-economy-end-social-distancing
I posted it already, but scientists don't think the most likely scenario is via the lab route.This is the most objective account I've seen of what China's leadership was really doing in early January:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...blic_during_6_key_days_in_january_142952.html
U.S. iIntel s now investigating the possibility that the virus originated from a lab studying bat viruses. One such lab is apparently just a few hundred meters from the wet market, while another is further away in Wuhan. The Chinese-authored paper laying out the evidence for this was censored by the authorities. If the virus really did result from a lab, someone has to know this. All you would have to do is compare the sequence of the lab virus with the published sequence from the virus isolated from patients. In fact, when the patient sequence was first published, I'm surprised that someone in the lab didn't check to see if there was a match. But apparently the CCP really does not want this idea floating around.
Here's an article on Ab false positives, which claims that many of the tests currently being used have false positive rates that are a problem, given the likelihood that true positives are likely to be relatively few:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...ibody-tests-for-coronavirus-can-miss-the-mark
The author does use somewhat confusing terminology. In standard terminology, specificity refers to what % of true positives a test picks up (the more specific, the fewer false negatives); while selectivity refers to what % of positives picked up are true positives (the more selective, the fewer false positives). The author uses sensitivity instead of specificity, and specificity instead of selectivity.
Exactly...on the growing suspicion that the virus originated from the level-4 biolab located in Wuhan. A few days ago I posted a link that went into more detail and a counterpoint was posted suggesting the virus came from a bat at the wet market. I'm not buying it. There's just too much suspicion going on with the Chinese government concerning this. What appears to be a cover-up with the misinformation & deception they gave from the get go. Plus the tie in with the WHO and the misinformation they provided (funding stopped immediately by President!). There's missing scientists and a couple of reporters that were on the ground in Wuhan investigating this story when they suddenly went missing. Also, none of our CDC people are allowed over there to investigate. No transparency with China - WTH are they hiding?This is the most objective account I've seen of what China's leadership was really doing in early January:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...blic_during_6_key_days_in_january_142952.html
U.S. iIntel s now investigating the possibility that the virus originated from a lab studying bat viruses. One such lab is apparently just a few hundred meters from the wet market, while another is further away in Wuhan. The Chinese-authored paper laying out the evidence for this was censored by the authorities. If the virus really did result from a lab, someone has to know this. All you would have to do is compare the sequence of the lab virus with the published sequence from the virus isolated from patients. In fact, when the patient sequence was first published, I'm surprised that someone in the lab didn't check to see if there was a match. But apparently the CCP really does not want this idea floating around.
Here's an article on Ab false positives, which claims that many of the tests currently being used have false positive rates that are a problem, given the likelihood that true positives are likely to be relatively few:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...ibody-tests-for-coronavirus-can-miss-the-mark
The author does use somewhat confusing terminology. In standard terminology, specificity refers to what % of true positives a test picks up (the more specific, the fewer false negatives); while selectivity refers to what % of positives picked up are true positives (the more selective, the fewer false positives). The author uses sensitivity instead of specificity, and specificity instead of selectivity.
And confederate flags. Yep. Passionate gardeners.
It was snowing. Also great for gardening. I doubt the ground is thawed.