- May 6, 2009
Amla goes, I suppose Kallis will let Smith get his 100.
Haharamjambunath said:It's a good time to bring this out-
Q: What do you call a world-class Australian cricketer?
Q: What do you call an Australian who can hold a catch?
A: A fisherman.
Q: What do you call an Australian with a bottle of champagne?
A: A waiter.
Q: What is the main function of the Australian coach?
A: To transport the team from the hotel to the ground.
Q: Where do Australian batsmen play their best cricket?
A: In advertisements.
Q: Why don’t Australian fielders need travel injections?
A: Because they never catch anything.
It's happened 6 times but only 5 times have teams been all out (excluding 0/0 dec for obvious reasons)Dancing On The Pedals said:What a bizarre match. Can't be many occasions where a team has been bowled out for under 100 in the first innings and gone on to win so convincingly. Amla and Smith showed what could be done with a bit of application.
I chuckled, in a way he's right.craig1985 said:
I posted this earlier in the thread, he left in the middle of a tour (to New Zealand) to try and save his marriage with a superstar, who (as it turned out) was gallivanting with other celeb sportsmen (Brendan Favola). Ever since that time, he's suffered a lot from the media. He also acted a bit 'posh' by not singing 'Under the Southern Cross' (the Australian team song) and trying to be with Lara Bingle, which led to the bust up with Katich. About Matthews criticising Symonds, I have no problem with that. Symonds' discipline is well known to be doubtful (he was inebriated when Bangladesh beat Australia in Cardiff in 2005)Midnightfright said:I've always thought Katich is an Excellent opening batsman seems a shame that he isn't in the team just because of a dislike for Clarke. I don't know much about Clarke as a person or his media profile in Australia but he does seem to rub a lot of people up the wrong way.