Critérium du Dauphiné 2023, June 4 - 11

Page 22 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 30, 2022
7,444
10,835
17,180
Laughable, as per usual. This is worthy of a DSQ on Bennett's behalf. But since nobody crashed, a relegation will suffice.
How is this a DQ? I just rewatched the replay and Groenewegen is a bit stuck near the barriers but also in no danger whatsoever. I think DQs should be reserved for dangerous behavior, not for unfair moves.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
He got the case of not being on the Quickstep team anymore. It has happened to a lot of sprinters.
He lost his form while still on QS. He‘d been dominant in the early part of his second season there, then got injured before the Tour and has never been quite the same since. That was the injury Lefevere speculated that he was faking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
How is this a DQ? I just rewatched the replay and Groenewegen is a bit stuck near the barriers but also in no danger whatsoever. I think DQs should be reserved for dangerous behavior, not for unfair moves.
You are of the opinion that deviating from the left side of the road, all the way to the right is not dangerous behaviour? Would you have deemed it dangerous if they crashed because of this exact move?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Dec 2, 2020
2,037
2,936
11,180
You are of the opinion that deviating from the left side of the road, all the way to the right is not dangerous behaviour? Would you have deemed it dangerous if they crashed because of this exact move?
That deviation was not DSQ level imo. Enough for relegation but not every relegation is worthy of DQ.
 
Aug 3, 2015
22,743
10,688
28,180
I'd definitely be down for a Bennett DSQ. These sprinters think they can get away with stuff like this, and its dangerous as heck.

Screw it while were at it, just throw Groenewegen out as well. Definitely wont complain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
53,958
44,340
28,180
That deviation was not DSQ level imo. Enough for relegation but not every relegation is worthy of DQ.
He literally deviates the entire width of the road as soon as he realises he's going 0 km/h and everyone is gonna pass him otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Dec 2, 2020
2,037
2,936
11,180
He literally deviates the entire width of the road as soon as he realises he's going 0 km/h and everyone is gonna pass him otherwise.
It happened over a longer distance than most deviations and was nowhere near as aggressive as many of those situations. If they differentiate between relegation and DQ in the first place, this is more in the realm of relegation imo. Groenewegen’s push looked more dangerous and I saw some elbowing in the peloton in the final few k that was arguably more dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
53,958
44,340
28,180
But still, a DSQ? It wasn't that dangerous... Unfair, sure.
Relegation is basically 0 punishment. You only get relegated from winning sprints you weren't winning anyway. So basic game theory would dictate you should always deviate if you don't have the speed.

And it's still dangerous behavior. Other riders have to take evasive action to not crash. It's not only dangerous when you cause a crash.
 
Nov 16, 2013
26,686
27,792
28,180
Relegation is basically 0 punishment. You only get relegated from winning sprints you weren't winning anyway. So basic game theory would dictate you should always deviate if you don't have the speed.

And it's still dangerous behavior. Other riders have to take evasive action to not crash. It's not only dangerous when you cause a crash.

So relegation should not be applicable unless you win a stage?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Oct 15, 2017
16,892
18,785
28,180
I dont see no problem that both got punished.

Bennett obvious one and Groenewegen went in on Grovekar.

Groenewegen not the sharpest tool in the box judging by those tweets. Would have been better to stay quiet on this for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan