Its worth watching this clip from back in January
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/38573615
I simply cant see how his position remains tenable in any way shape or form. His whole management of this affair seems to be bordering on delusional.
1. The narrative around the TUE for Wiggins was based upon the narrative of a 1 off, hayfever, exceptional circumstances, specialist advice yada yada yada.
*We now know that BC/SKY had a stockpile of said Corticosteroid at Manchester, presumably for GC riders to drop kilos of weight in advance/in between stage races, so clearly not a 1 off, and on face value this probably involves the GC 'core' of the team*
2. Sapsteads account of Dr Freeman breaking team rules by not following their medical upload/dropbox protocol.
*Brailsfords numerous accounts of running a tight ship & his meetings/supervision of medical staff don't concur with what Sapstead's description of Freeman being a rule breaker. Surely Brailsford would have had some kind of disciplinary with Freeman for breaking said rules? How was they guy allowed to break those rules for a number of years before the alleged theft of his laptop? Moreover how was he allowed to continue working for BC/Sky up until recently.
No doubt point (2) above will be the thrust of the Select Committee next line of questioning if they pull Brailsford back.
Will be interesting to see how much Brailsford pleads ignorance of 'the medical department' if he is questioned about it again!!
At what point does one of these individuals he has thrown under the buss finally fess up and say "Dave knew everything".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/38573615
I simply cant see how his position remains tenable in any way shape or form. His whole management of this affair seems to be bordering on delusional.
1. The narrative around the TUE for Wiggins was based upon the narrative of a 1 off, hayfever, exceptional circumstances, specialist advice yada yada yada.
*We now know that BC/SKY had a stockpile of said Corticosteroid at Manchester, presumably for GC riders to drop kilos of weight in advance/in between stage races, so clearly not a 1 off, and on face value this probably involves the GC 'core' of the team*
2. Sapsteads account of Dr Freeman breaking team rules by not following their medical upload/dropbox protocol.
*Brailsfords numerous accounts of running a tight ship & his meetings/supervision of medical staff don't concur with what Sapstead's description of Freeman being a rule breaker. Surely Brailsford would have had some kind of disciplinary with Freeman for breaking said rules? How was they guy allowed to break those rules for a number of years before the alleged theft of his laptop? Moreover how was he allowed to continue working for BC/Sky up until recently.
No doubt point (2) above will be the thrust of the Select Committee next line of questioning if they pull Brailsford back.
Will be interesting to see how much Brailsford pleads ignorance of 'the medical department' if he is questioned about it again!!
At what point does one of these individuals he has thrown under the buss finally fess up and say "Dave knew everything".