- Mar 13, 2013
- 4,857
- 903
- 17,680
Said relationship with UCI and TUE got them less success though than when they had neither? TUE pretty common although other riders actually do better than Sky it seems looking at the number of wins.
And the Giro in '05 too.thehog said:Bruyneel had luck just like Brailsford. The key being a friendly relationship with the UCI and Dr TUE. You make your own luck. Bruyneel won a lot of races with his team. It wasn’t all Lance. USPS was a fairly awesome outfit results wise. Heras won the Vuelta twice with USPS (or was it three?). Contador a Tour, a Giro and a Vuelta with Bruyneel.
Bruyneel sadly never won the atomic jock race though... the one that got away...![]()
good point.Dear Wiggo said:Team Sky should thank their lucky stars CIRC and the new "association with dodgy characters" rules were not in play back in the glorious Leinder days and are not retrospective.
samhocking said:Said relationship with UCI and TUE got them less success though than when they had neither? TUE pretty common although other riders actually do better than Sky it seems looking at the number of wins.
Netserk said:And the Giro in '05 too.
thehog said:Froome won the race that he received the TUE. By a long way. Even though he was sick... or you forgot that point?
Sadly TUEs don't fix broken wrists![]()
Dear Wiggo said:Should have clarified - his road luck. You think Lance could not have won without JB?
Wallace and Gromit said:I'll agree that Sir Dave has been lucky on the road. Whilst one may question the means by which the Tour wins were achieved, to set up a team and then have Wiggins materialise as a potential Tour winner was lucky.
Re Lance, I think (educated guess) he would have won his Tours post-cancer with Kermit the Frog as his DS. There's any number of folk could have played the ruthless JB role, but there was only one cancer survivor untainted by Festina (and thus the UCI's ideal posterboy) with the physiology + PED response and willingness to experiment to win the Tour.
samhocking said:Riders are allowed to win races with a TUE with or without a relationship with UCI, what is your point? Those are the rules, not Sky's!
And how did Sky get Cookson in to have this 'relaltionship'? I see no evidence of brown paper envelopes to all 42 delegates in that race!
and it was either Orwell or Twain who tweaked that aphorism a little.Mrs John Murphy said:Karl Marx says hi.
thehog said:Back on topic.
Brailsford makes zero sense. Do people in Britain actually buy what comes out of his mouth?
Mrs John Murphy said:A DS is only as good as the programme he is able to organize.
TheSpud said:There's no reason why those statements arent talking about their internal doping program. Then again they may not be.
ebandit said:once maybe? but 2 different equally unlikely riders..............is such unparalleled success other than ..............genius?
Mark L
ray j willings said:Brailsford is like Madonna, He does not have much talent, he just gets the right people around him.
At some point in time, people have to accept that performances are going to move forward. If we always hold back, and say, here is some data from people who were doping, then if we draw a line, we can then deduce that anyone crossing that line must also be doping. Well, that’s false. They do not have to be doping, because the whole human race moves forward. At some point in time, clean performances will surpass the doped performances in the past
ebandit said:if we are to either aknowledge or mock the idea that DB is really genius
the question must be asked has any other DS created 2 such unlikely
tour winners as wiggo'froome?
Just wait until Porte wins Le Tour.Dear Wiggo said:Well the French haven't hated us for centuries....
Mrs John Murphy said:FFS if you are going to troll at least do it properly