The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
aphronesis said:All charged animus aside, I'm confused: is the argument that the bicycling industry doesn't run its own models and psychologies of planned obsolescence to keep ahead of all the "traps" that brought down larger industries of monopoly capital some years ago.
If the answer is of course it does, then regardless of actual improvements wouldn't this warrant some periodic skepticism of how the whole "package" (as opposed to part) begins to circulate?
What's so hard to follow. Was going from 32 hole eyeletted box section rims to low spoke ct aero carbon planned obsolescence? Or how about square taper bb to pressfit?aphronesis said:Not following your last sentence back to your first sentence.
Skepticism: most consumers don't show up to a test ride w/o some buzz in their ear.
aphronesis said:I'm confused
aphronesis said:Not following your last sentence back to your first sentence.
aphronesis said:Not hearing much give on this one.
aphronesis said:Not my terms. A bit light. But maybe different frequencies as it goes.
I'm long outside the industry and ride brakeless so don't care. As you know. Your conflicts with b and forum angst I can sympathize with but it's maybe overstated too. (This shades to the political thread.)
Then I have to ask, why are you posting here? This thread is for discussion about disc brakes on road bikes. Not an in depth discussion on marketing and users involvement in it. Can we please keep the discussion to disc brakes?aphronesis said:Not my terms. A bit light. But maybe different frequencies as it goes.
I'm long outside the industry and ride brakeless so don't care. As you know. Your conflicts with b and forum angst I can sympathize with but it's maybe overstated too. (This shades to the political thread.)
Giuseppe Magnetico said:Way to skirt everything in the last few posts. I'm asking you, not him. Him was an extreme example of a troll, you are just a more mild version of one because you saw what happened and you thought you'd have a go. So, wanna talk about bs marketing regarding disc brakes in road cycling? No? "Don't care".
So a mod draws a line in the sand and the first person in shows his clear intentions without much prying. Wonderful.
aphronesis said:Giuseppe Magnetico said:Way to skirt everything in the last few posts. I'm asking you, not him. Him was an extreme example of a troll, you are just a more mild version of one because you saw what happened and you thought you'd have a go. So, wanna talk about bs marketing regarding disc brakes in road cycling? No? "Don't care".
So a mod draws a line in the sand and the first person in shows his clear intentions without much prying. Wonderful.
Your last few posts were strictly personal. Light, but strictly personal. Manufacture and marketing of bikes is not trivial. Yet it's not clear you have a rounded or detached perspective on this. One can never speak of others' intentions'. I was looking for the point of dispute. You can't name it. Jackie can't. Per the above exchange w/ KB, I'm out.
Don't stop believing.
red_flanders said:Disc brakes clearly perform better than rim brakes. They brake faster, are less susceptible to slowing from heat and water on the road, and recover performance from heating more quickly. They don't interfere with glues. Is there some danger in a group from disc brakes in crashes? Seems there is. Are manufacturers trying to get teams to use them anyway because roadies will only but what the pros use? Yep.
Are rim brakes a problem? No, not really. Neither is steel as a frame/fork material. But there is stuff that performs better. Does anyone "need" them? Nope. Can one go a bit faster into corners with them? Yep. Do they inspire a bit more confidence? Yep. Are they being sold as the next cool thing? Yep. Do roadies fall for the next bit of gear pretty consistently? Yep.
Should I ever buy another road bike, it will have disc brakes. Great. Certainly glad to have them on my MTB.
JackRabbitSlims said:red_flanders said:Disc brakes clearly perform better than rim brakes. They brake faster, are less susceptible to slowing from heat and water on the road, and recover performance from heating more quickly. They don't interfere with glues. Is there some danger in a group from disc brakes in crashes? Seems there is. Are manufacturers trying to get teams to use them anyway because roadies will only but what the pros use? Yep.
Are rim brakes a problem? No, not really. Neither is steel as a frame/fork material. But there is stuff that performs better. Does anyone "need" them? Nope. Can one go a bit faster into corners with them? Yep. Do they inspire a bit more confidence? Yep. Are they being sold as the next cool thing? Yep. Do roadies fall for the next bit of gear pretty consistently? Yep.
Should I ever buy another road bike, it will have disc brakes. Great. Certainly glad to have them on my MTB.
Yep!
What Red Said ^^
Got them on the MTB, got them on my Touring Bike and my next road bike will have them also
blutto said:....yeah it claims to be science but the "study" only has an n of 4, so hardly the stuff to support a study but it is interesting none-the-less...
....so a pretty good rider goes down a long really fast hill in both dry and wet conditions using rim and disc brakes....
....the quick and dirty takeaway...in over 9km of screaming descent with some wicked switchbacks....the rim brakes "win" by two seconds in the dry and "lose" by eight seconds in the wet....and on a top end bike you would be spending near $10,000 to go disc and then hamper yourself with extra weight for the "money" part of the trip, the uphill....and you don't believe me go ask Marcel Kittel, he knows stuff and even has some practical experience....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0hKMgUEku4
....file under just sayin eh....
Cheers