D-Queued said:
I did.
I still found it odd that the letter couldn't even be indexed by the UCI search.
No surprise.
I completely disagree that the doping hot line is a good idea. It is fundamentally flawed. No, that is wrong. To say that it is completely stupid only scratches the surface on how ill conceived and obviously contrived it is.
Dave.
Pretty well summed up. I cannot believe the naivety of UCI in thinking that the lack of a "hotline" was in any way detrimental to anti-dopng efforts. I have yet to see any of the confessions, and I read all the the ASADA document, where the riders said, 'I did not want to dope, but there was not anyway to contact the UCI and have them do something about the team doping. And its even stupider for individual doping. Do they really think that a rider would cal them up and ask if EPO is against the rules, then say well, know that I know that I will not be taking that! Good God, can Pat really be this dumb? And, to further make things sound bad, notice that he writes
" I have decided that, during the first quarter of 2013, the UCI will set in motion a wide-ranging consultation exercise involving all cycling’s stakeholders to tackle issues of concern within the sport and work together to build a bright future for cycling"
So when its the new hotline - its UCI has decided, but for sitting around talking about things, Pat has decided. Makes me think that he was ordered to set up the hotline and does not have any faith whatsoever it will have the desired effect.
And as the last of the idiotic things in Pat's letter - "the UCI did act on information provided in the past and it will always do so in the future, within the bounds of what is legally feasible." For example, when questions about the impartiality of UCI have arisen, we sued the pants off anyone who dares to question us!
What a tool. You would think that a international body governing a major sport could do better.