The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
A 'significant' number of 'major' names in world athletics will this week be confirmed as historic dopers and be stripped of medals won as long ago as 2005, the Mail on Sunday can reveal.
The development is the result of the long-term pursuit of drug cheats by the International Association of Athletics Federations, and will come just as the world governing body are under fire accused of failing to tackle doping effectively.
It is believed that one of those set to be exposed, as a result of re-testing old samples using new technology, and monitoring of developments over time in athlete blood passports (ABPs), could be double world champion Tatyana Tomashova.
'There's going to be a bombshell,' said a source. 'We're talking about big names, multiple names. It's taken time to nail some of these athletes but the message will be clear to all cheats — your past can and will catch up with you.'
It is understood there are no Britons involved in the cases to be announced this week. The timing will no doubt lead to scepticism that athletics' world governing body has been stung into action by recent adverse publicity.
It is rubbish. Pushes an agenda of hate against pretty much anyone who is not a white middle class straight english man.Zebadeedee said:I thought the Daily Mail had been derided on this forum as rubbish. I think that description is a standard put-down, mainly by lefty malcontents, who dislike its right-leaning appeal to its solidly middle class, female-centered audience. Its online version is claimed to be the world's most viewed newspaper website. Its sports coverage is good in my view, often covering events or issues in my sport (tennis) that other newspapers don't bother with.
wait, did not she just say she wanted to release her blood numbers?Benotti69 said:Radcliffe not releasing any blood values...........................hmmmmmmmm
elduggo said:According to the sunday times today the person who took out the super-injunction is male.
The exact quote - "A top sportsman, unarguably No 1 in his calling, has used this device in the last week. The goal? To keep information away from the public. But surely there will be a price to pay. I wonder if, in the end, it's worth the bother. Surely it would be better if he just had a heart-to-heart with his wife!
(its in Rod Liddle's column)
elduggo said:According to the sunday times today the person who took out the super-injunction is male.
The exact quote - "A top sportsman, unarguably No 1 in his calling, has used this device in the last week. The goal? To keep information away from the public. But surely there will be a price to pay. I wonder if, in the end, it's worth the bother. Surely it would be better if he just had a heart-to-heart with his wife!
(its in Rod Liddle's column)
Liddle could have done a better job on keeping it more crypted, this has hello Joe Hart all over the place.elduggo said:According to the sunday times today the person who took out the super-injunction is male.
The exact quote - "A top sportsman, unarguably No 1 in his calling, has used this device in the last week. The goal? To keep information away from the public. But surely there will be a price to pay. I wonder if, in the end, it's worth the bother. Surely it would be better if he just had a heart-to-heart with his wife!
(its in Rod Liddle's column)
elduggo said:According to the sunday times today the person who took out the super-injunction is male.
Zebadeedee said:elduggo said:According to the sunday times today the person who took out the super-injunction is male.
The exact quote - "A top sportsman, unarguably No 1 in his calling, has used this device in the last week. The goal? To keep information away from the public. But surely there will be a price to pay. I wonder if, in the end, it's worth the bother. Surely it would be better if he just had a heart-to-heart with his wife!
(its in Rod Liddle's column)
You're confusing two separate matters. Joe Hart shagged Katie Price and doesn't want the world to know.
blackcat said:elduggo said:According to the sunday times today the person who took out the super-injunction is male.
The exact quote - "A top sportsman, unarguably No 1 in his calling, has used this device in the last week. The goal? To keep information away from the public. But surely there will be a price to pay. I wonder if, in the end, it's worth the bother. Surely it would be better if he just had a heart-to-heart with his wife!
(its in Rod Liddle's column)
I would not put it past the Radcliffe team to get someone to do a false flag leak.
afterall, she doped and was doping when she had the EPO Cheats Out! poster up
SundayRider said:I doubt Linford Christie would have tweeted about that.
Do we know if these are all the tests that have been done on these athletes?roundabout said:His profile doesn't look like a mountain stage, but an off-score in the 60's?