The Hitch said:All that shows is how incredibly stupid football fans are.
Link to that poll.
http://www.fourfourtwo.com/news/players-tell-fft-drug-taking-and-match-fixing
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Hitch said:All that shows is how incredibly stupid football fans are.
well put.The Hitch said:...
The nature of battle, when that much money is at stakes, dictates that people will go as far as they can, and those who don't lose out. Cycling in the 90's had one 1000th of the money at stake and all forces for clean sport were removed.
Unless there is some invisible variable, which is highly unlikely, it is sociologically impossible for a sport with the money football has, to not be rife with doping.
buckle said:Is the relative decline of Italian football doping related? As in CONI having a 'quiet word' here and there?
I watched the confederations cup Italy/Spain game and DeRossi (he may well be clean also) apart, the Italians seemed to crack collectively. Their decline is noticeable however with Juventus' small new stadium a symbol of a new humility/reality or am I waxing lyrical?
buckle said:Is the relative decline of Italian football doping related? As in CONI having a 'quiet word' here and there?
I watched the confederations cup Italy/Spain game and DeRossi (he may well be clean also) apart, the Italians seemed to crack collectively. Their decline is noticeable however with Juventus' small new stadium a symbol of a new humility/reality or am I waxing lyrical?
the sceptic said:Id guess the economy is the biggest reason why Italian football is in decline.
The Hitch said:Spains economy is worse and it hasn't hindered them
gooner said:The medical department is the same with Colin Lewin, Gary O'Driscoll and Tony Colbert. I think you'll find that Dortmund ran 11km more than Arsenal as a team in the Emirates last month.
Why is it that every improvement is just put down to doping programme? Why this season so and not 2012, 2011, 2010 when they weren't winning anything?
It's a too simplistic view.
LastDamnation said:I'd assumed that arsenal's injury record (http://injuryleague.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/140416.jpg) was a sign that they weren't doping as much as rivals (chelsea low for example), or is this wrong/overly simplistic?
gooner said:It's hard to know what's up with Arsenal's injury problems and they have been getting a lot of criticism in this department. Wenger deserves a bit of it for the Ramsey one considering he got told back in December by the medical department to rest him for the West Ham game which he picked up an injury in the end in. I think overall it's a bit of red herring and Gary O'Driscoll who came over from Irish Rugby years back, is now the doctor there and is widely respected in his profession. Frank Warren, the boxing promoter had a look at the training ground in the past and said the medical facilities were first class where other sports could learn from it.
It's been blown out of proportion and you get guys like Raymond Verheijen who has an agenda and loves the sound of his own voice in criticising the likes of Arsenal and United for their injury prevention record. That fellow has a total agenda. I wouldn't listen to a word out of his mouth.
England's World Cup squad will be among the first elite athletes to undergo new doping test regimes that scientists hope will cut out the use of performance-enhancing drugs.
Players at the tournament in Brazil are to have their blood and urine compared with samples taken in previous competitions to check whether there are any discrepancies. Their samples will also be stored for a number of years so scientists can re-analyse them in the future.
Doping experts said storing samples would mean that performance-enhancing drugs which were undetectable using current testing methods may be picked up later. It would also mean that any changes in their biological make-up could be tracked over time. They said this would be a "major deterrent" for athletes who considered the use of such drugs.
the sceptic said:Ah, so football has moved on to the "we will show we are serious about testing, to prove our sport is cleans" phase.
There is no chance this is anything more than PR though. Imagine if Bale tested positive after completing his 2 billion move to Madrid. All hell would break lose. No way they will allow anything like that to happen.
the sceptic said:Ah, so football has moved on to the "we will show we are serious about testing, to prove our sport is cleans" phase.
There is no chance this is anything more than PR though. Imagine if Bale tested positive after completing his 2 billion move to Madrid. All hell would break lose. No way they will allow anything like that to happen.
the sceptic said:Ah, so football has moved on to the "we will show we are serious about testing, to prove our sport is cleans" phase.
There is no chance this is anything more than PR though. Imagine if Bale tested positive after completing his 2 billion move to Madrid. All hell would break lose. No way they will allow anything like that to happen.
The Hitch said:American football doesn't even test for hgh .
regardless of the doping question, i think there was some good skill to it.Briant_Gumble said:Bale's goal in the Copa Del Rey looked as extra terrestrial as anything I've seen recently in football. Limited skill to it, just superhuman athleticism.
I don't care if George Graham said he was going to be a great left back after his first game that guy has to be doping.
RobbieCanuck said:Here is a disturbing report in the New York Times about the company responsible for overseeing drug testing in American Sports (a freebie for you Hitch).
"A senior executive at the company that oversees drug testing for the N.C.A.A., the N.F.L., the N.B.A., Major League Baseball and several other top sports organizations claimed in a lawsuit filed this week that she was fired after she voiced concerns about the handling of a football player’s positive drug test.
Andrea Wickerham, a former vice president of the National Center for Drug Free Sport, said that the company improperly handled the July 2013 drug test of an N.F.L. player because it did not want to risk losing the league as a client.
In the past decade, Drug Free Sport has found a niche business model in doping detection. It works with most of the major sports leagues but has been criticized for uncovering few violations
Don Catlin, the former head of U.C.L.A.’s Olympic Analytical Lab, called the allegations in Wickerham’s complaint “very serious.”
“The system needs to be very trustworthy from one end to another,” said Catlin, who oversaw the testing of many of Drug Free Sport’s urine samples when he was at U.C.L.A. “All complaints need to be fully investigated.”
Link http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/26/s...c=edit_tnt_20140425&nlid=60818045&tntemail0=y