Kokoso said:
So you and Cloxxi simply say that to win a race or get better implies doping?

Ah...that's crap IMO. Than we'd have to had no winners and no improving athletes not to talk about doping every time.
About Vítková you are wrong, she did better few years ago.
This I posted before and most of it is still quiet actual:
Moravec is going well from the start of season, it's nothing out of the blue. And for Soukalova -again you clearly don't know about what you are babbling. She was always talented, only you don't know her results. E.g. in Khanty Mansiysk world champs in 2010/2011 season she was 25th in sprint and 22th in pursuit. She's still very young (1.11.1989). Last season she had some health issues (mononucleosis amongst others), but this season she's going well from the beginning, fulfilling her promising talent. Only thing is that she lacks some preparation (due to mononucleosis mentioned above), so it would be no wonder if she gets tired soon or later.
Well... Look at the Slesinger. He's definitely worse than he used to be and he's been long time number one amongst Czech biathletes. And Soukup, who even reached for medal last year WC and had very good results (now is long time ill, shame for him and Czech relay). So not everybody improved. Soukalova and Moravec (multiple medailist in junior categories) had very good results in younger categories . For Moravec it took more time to adapt (or how to call it). Vitkova showed results like this in past. And in the past Slesinger and other biathletes won medals here and there.
I just think that Soukalova is great talent. Even I think she could be a star one day, cause she's strong mentally (unlike other Czechs). And she's quite pretty as well btw.
But I never said it was doping.
I said that it was wrong not to say they have made big strides this season and imply like this is something that was expected by all. After all, I've seen suspicions of Gössner based on her improvement from last season, when health issues caused her to underperform last season and she was already an Olympic XC and World Biathlon medallist. Last time this was brought up, I mentioned that Soukalová had been nowhere on results sheets last season and asked why that was. You mentioned she had had health issues, and that assuaged most of my doubts.
But don't act like we're all complete idiots for not recognising that she was clearly a World Cup winner in the making based on a couple of impressive performances at the Worlds at Khanty. Dorothea Wierer won a bunch of Junior World Championships medals and put in similarly impressive, if not more impressive, performances at the 2011 World Championships, and hasn't improved to the same extent. Does that mean Soukalová must be doping? Of course it doesn't. But Wierer's been a constant on the World Cup circuit since then and hasn't really moved on, whereas health issues meant Soukalová dropped off the radar of many fans outside of the Czech Republic a bit.
I did not say that the Czechs were doping, and even proffered MANY potential explanations that did not include doping that could justify the reason results have improved. By contending my statement you're suggesting that you think that I was supporting the implication of Czech doping, when in fact I was refuting your comeback that the Czech performances had not improved. There are plenty of valid arguments that can be made against the assumption that the Czechs are doping, but the one you've chosen isn't really the best.
FWIW:
2011-12 Nation's Cup Men
6 Czech Republic 5813
2012-13 Nation's Cup Men
6 Czech Republic 6517
2011-12 Nation's Cup Women
13 Czech Republic 4249
2012-13 Nation's Cup Women
9 Czech Republic 6015
Number of Czech wins 2011-12: 0
Number of Czech wins 2012-13: 4
THIS IS NOT TO BE READ AS AN INDICATION OF DOPING.
However, it does quite clearly point out that the Czech results have improved, and so attacking people for pointing that out is not the best strategy. They may be in the same position in the nation's cup for the men, but the points scored has gone up by a clear margin. Amongst the women, however, their improvement has been clear and marked.
I know the Clinic is a mire of doping innuendo and conspiracy theorists, but this isn't the Sky thread, and just because something has been mentioned does not mean that doping is automatically assumed to be the reason. Many of us outside the Czech Republic are not necessarily aware of changes going on in Czech biathlon, as it's not so widely reported on as in the big biathlon nations like Norway, Germany and Russia. When I asked about Soukalová early in the season, I was asking out of ignorance, not incredulity. It looks like her rise was certainly a plausible one as she clearly showed talent early on, I just hadn't been aware of her potential/had forgotten about her due to her lost season last year.
Also, perhaps try not being so confrontational about it. Your country has produced a hell of a biathlon season with four wins and a number of other podiums, and are no longer seen as a "surprise package" when they pop up near the front of a relay. You have some useful looking youngsters, and that Soukalová and Moravec have taken over as the top names will help tide you over and keep you at the top, as opposed to relying too long on the same older athletes, which can leave you struggling when they retire (see Poland's men, or Sweden's women). It may be, in your words, "crap" to immediately insinuate doping. But it's also "crap" to belittle their progress this season by implying there hasn't been any.