• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

  • We hope all of you have a great holiday season and an incredible New Year. Thanks so much for being part of the Cycling News community!

Early peakers

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 29, 2016
634
1
0
Visit site
Re:

GuyIncognito said:
In Berzin's case because he married a filthy rich italian woman who loved to party.
After that he couldn't care less about training ever again. It was all about partying and enjoying her money and company.

Any source for that? Interesting I have never heard of it ... .
 
Quite a few to mention here, for various reasons. Obviously I think it best not to include those like Kai Reus for whom there were distinctive and obvious reasons beyond their control why they never fulfilled the promise shown.

Cunego is perhaps the poster boy for this, exploding on to the scene but never quite replicating that emergence, while others were simply overhyped and in retrospect their youthful performances were not quite all that they were made out to be and so it's less of a surprise they were unable to live up to the weight of expectations - Brice Feillu is a good example of this. Plenty of people for whom it was the mental side of the sport that they couldn't adapt to - like Moser mentioned above - but also for someone like Andy Schleck there's a combination of both the mental side and injuries.

There's quite a few who've never quite lived up to their promise as espoirs, but for people who've become established pros, there are even those who've had very strong careers who have never quite managed to fulfil the expectations of them, like Edvald Boasson Hagen.

Come to think of it, digging back into his career there were quite a few 'early peakers' at Bob Stapleton's merry band of boredom-mongers. Löfkvist looked like Sky's second best GC option (and indeed in 2010 turned into their actual best one) at one stage, while Matt Goss fell off a cliff, and Gerald Ciolek might have that anomalous win in Milano-Sanremo but never delivered otherwise on what was a lot of promise early on. Aside from them, all those flaky climbers Patrick Lefèvre signed to be Quick Step's GC option - people like Perdiguero and Rujano - are good examples too. Kevin Seeldraeyers once won the maglia bianca. Remember when Martijn Maaskant was supposed to become a major cobbled contender? And of course there's a perennial forum favourite that needs to be mentioned here: Carlos Betancur.

Plus, of course, probably the all time greatest early peaker: Freddie Maertens.
 
Going back to the first post: Gesink still is an excellent rider and he seems like a great guy. But he never won much at any level. Ulrich was very good, he won two GTs and was on the podium in Paris eight times. He just wasn't better than HWMNBN. Quintana is very good, he won two GTs and has been on the podium in Paris three times. He has just hasn't been better than Chris Froome.

I do think agree that the most cycling prodigies tend to peak relatively early and burn out to a degree. But many of them do manage to accomplish a lot while there on peak form. In fact, I think they have an even better track record than the late bloomers.

I mean, how about two riders from the Brabant, who both won one of the biggest one day races the sport had on offer around the time they turned 21. One had a single major result after turning 30 (two, if we're pushing it) and was basically retired by 31. The other has also had a single major result after turning 27 (two, if we're pushing it). Hint: they both share a nickname and a place in my all-time rankings.
 
It's also worth considering that a fair number of riders 'punch above their weight' every now and then. I don't mean that harshly, but just that some might get a relatively lucky big win, or they have a period of great form that is way above their usual level and it happens to coincide with a race that suits them...then after their lucky win or period of great form, they regress to their usual standard...

Now, when this happens with an established rider, people tend not to think too much of it and take it for what it is - think of Van Summeren and his PR win for example; nobody expected him to become the next Messeuw; everybody knew it was a somewhat lucky win.
But when it happens with a young rider, there's understandably a lot of hype around them. Then when they regress to their usual standard, it appears that they've peaked early...
 
Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
Well some were early peakers because there was not much to gain anymore.Others because they had horrible crashes and injuries to set them back. Others because fof clinical reasons.

Would that make it less a case of how early they reached the top, and more a case of how early they fell from the top?
I mean, Eddy Merckx reached the top pretty young, and then he just kinda stayed up there. Which I guess would make it less of a "peak" and more of a "ridge"...
 
Re:

GuyIncognito said:
In Berzin's case because he married a filthy rich italian woman who loved to party.
After that he couldn't care less about training ever again. It was all about partying and enjoying her money and company.

As far as I remember the woman Berzin married was twenty years older and owned a used car dealership in the province Pavia. That description looks more accurate for Romans Vainsteins who married the daughter of the Vini Caldirola sponsor and pretty was much was over as a cyclist two years after he was world champ.
 
Re: Re:

ciranda said:
GuyIncognito said:
In Berzin's case because he married a filthy rich italian woman who loved to party.
After that he couldn't care less about training ever again. It was all about partying and enjoying her money and company.

As far as I remember the woman Berzin married was twenty years older and owned a used car dealership in the province Pavia. That description looks more accurate for Romans Vainsteins who married the daughter of the Vini Caldirola sponsor and pretty was much was over as a cyclist two years after he was world champ.
Eugeni married Helena from a quite wealthy Italian family and indeed owns some Fiat stores nowadays.

Berzin ain't got nothing but training hard in his mind, when he moved over to Italy from Vyborg! Once the success, the marriage and the wealth came, his priorities changed drastically. That's how his former sports director Bombini once phrased it.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/evgeni-berzin-russian-roulette/
http://www.cycling4fans.de/index.php?id=1036

These are two quite interesting articles about Berzin. Especially the German summeration of his career is a nice read if you understand the language.
 
Jun 30, 2014
7,060
2
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

staubsauger said:
ciranda said:
GuyIncognito said:
In Berzin's case because he married a filthy rich italian woman who loved to party.
After that he couldn't care less about training ever again. It was all about partying and enjoying her money and company.

As far as I remember the woman Berzin married was twenty years older and owned a used car dealership in the province Pavia. That description looks more accurate for Romans Vainsteins who married the daughter of the Vini Caldirola sponsor and pretty was much was over as a cyclist two years after he was world champ.
Eugeni married Helena from a quite wealthy Italian family and indeed owns some Fiat stores nowadays.

Berzin ain't got nothing but training hard in his mind, when he moved over to Italy from Vyborg! Once the success, the marriage and the wealth came, his priorities changed drastically. That's how his former sports director Bombini once phrased it.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/evgeni-berzin-russian-roulette/
http://www.cycling4fans.de/index.php?id=1036

These are two quite interesting articles about Berzin. Especially the German summeration of his career is a nice read if you understand the language.
If I remember correctly he also hated his old track cycling coach in Leningrad and called him sadistic a few years later, he made them train really hard at a young age.
 
Re: Re:

Mayomaniac said:
staubsauger said:
ciranda said:
GuyIncognito said:
In Berzin's case because he married a filthy rich italian woman who loved to party.
After that he couldn't care less about training ever again. It was all about partying and enjoying her money and company.

As far as I remember the woman Berzin married was twenty years older and owned a used car dealership in the province Pavia. That description looks more accurate for Romans Vainsteins who married the daughter of the Vini Caldirola sponsor and pretty was much was over as a cyclist two years after he was world champ.
Eugeni married Helena from a quite wealthy Italian family and indeed owns some Fiat stores nowadays.

Berzin ain't got nothing but training hard in his mind, when he moved over to Italy from Vyborg! Once the success, the marriage and the wealth came, his priorities changed drastically. That's how his former sports director Bombini once phrased it.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/evgeni-berzin-russian-roulette/
http://www.cycling4fans.de/index.php?id=1036

These are two quite interesting articles about Berzin. Especially the German summeration of his career is a nice read if you understand the language.
If I remember correctly he also hated his old track cycling coach in Leningrad and called him sadistic a few years later, he made them train really hard at a young age.
Yeah. Aleksandr Kuznetsov, father of tennis player Svetlana Kuznetsova, who also trained Viacheslav Ekimov in the UdSSR!
 
Re:

Libertine Seguros said:
There's quite a few who've never quite lived up to their promise as espoirs, but for people who've become established pros, there are even those who've had very strong careers who have never quite managed to fulfil the expectations of them, like Edvald Boasson Hagen.

Come to think of it, digging back into his career there were quite a few 'early peakers' at Bob Stapleton's merry band of boredom-mongers. Löfkvist looked like Sky's second best GC option (and indeed in 2010 turned into their actual best one) at one stage, while Matt Goss fell off a cliff, and Gerald Ciolek might have that anomalous win in Milano-Sanremo but never delivered otherwise on what was a lot of promise early on. Aside from them, all those flaky climbers Patrick Lefèvre signed to be Quick Step's GC option - people like Perdiguero and Rujano - are good examples too. Kevin Seeldraeyers once won the maglia bianca. Remember when Martijn Maaskant was supposed to become a major cobbled contender? And of course there's a perennial forum favourite that needs to be mentioned here: Carlos Betancur.

Plus, of course, probably the all time greatest early peaker: Freddie Maertens.

Goss, the rumour was alcohol. Never been confirmed AFAIK

Seeldraeyers several team members publicly called him lazy

Ciolek I have no clue. He was very good at Wiesenhof long before Columbia

Maaskant had a horror crash with the accompanying severe injury

Maertens, I'll quote the soigneur who worked with him:
A once great champion brought low by overuse of 'magic potion'

ciranda said:
GuyIncognito said:
In Berzin's case because he married a filthy rich italian woman who loved to party.
After that he couldn't care less about training ever again. It was all about partying and enjoying her money and company.

As far as I remember the woman Berzin married was twenty years older and owned a used car dealership in the province Pavia. That description looks more accurate for Romans Vainsteins who married the daughter of the Vini Caldirola sponsor and pretty was much was over as a cyclist two years after he was world champ.

Vainsteins was a different deal. He was described by those who worked with him as the single most hard working bloody minded cyclist they've ever seen. When he won the world championship and signed a big contract, in his mind he'd made it.

If your career was built on exceptional motivation and that motivation disappears, it's easy to see where it's going to lead.

Part of it was his hatred at being shunned in Latvia because "cycling isn't a real sport". Once he was world champion the country started seeing him with new eyes and the seething anger that drove him cooled.

Shame. For a couple of years he was easily one of the world's best and most all-round riders

Mayomaniac said:
Exactly, Berzin hates that guy, according to him he's a sadist.

Berzin hates everyone, though :lol:

But he's hardly alone in his views of Kuznetsov
 
Re:

carton said:
Going back to the first post: Gesink still is an excellent rider and he seems like a great guy. But he never won much at any level. Ulrich was very good, he won two GTs and was on the podium in Paris eight times. He just wasn't better than HWMNBN. Quintana is very good, he won two GTs and has been on the podium in Paris three times. He has just hasn't been better than Chris Froome.

I do think agree that the most cycling prodigies tend to peak relatively early and burn out to a degree. But many of them do manage to accomplish a lot while there on peak form. In fact, I think they have an even better track record than the late bloomers.

I mean, how about two riders from the Brabant, who both won one of the biggest one day races the sport had on offer around the time they turned 21. One had a single major result after turning 30 (two, if we're pushing it) and was basically retired by 31. The other has also had a single major result after turning 27 (two, if we're pushing it). Hint: they both share a nickname and a place in my all-time rankings.

So, who are these guys?
 
Re: Re:

ciranda said:
GuyIncognito said:
In Berzin's case because he married a filthy rich italian woman who loved to party.
After that he couldn't care less about training ever again. It was all about partying and enjoying her money and company.

As far as I remember the woman Berzin married was twenty years older and owned a used car dealership in the province Pavia. That description looks more accurate for Romans Vainsteins who married the daughter of the Vini Caldirola sponsor and pretty was much was over as a cyclist two years after he was world champ.
If I remember correctly, you had a chance to draft him, and I did. Berzin '94, over BigMig and Pantani, the greatest GT win ever. Everything else is Clinic stuff, let's not go there :) .
 
Re:

GuyIncognito said:
The only names that come to mind are Vanderaerden and Van Hooydonck but they're from inbetween the two Brabants, not either of them.
And I have no idea what his all time rankings are, or what the nicknames are supposed to be.
Both of them have gone by the nickname "The Cannibal". One perhaps more than the other.
 
Re: Re:

carton said:
GuyIncognito said:
The only names that come to mind are Vanderaerden and Van Hooydonck but they're from inbetween the two Brabants, not either of them.
And I have no idea what his all time rankings are, or what the nicknames are supposed to be.
Both of them have gone by the nickname "The Cannibal". One perhaps more than the other.

Merckx as the 31 year old one then, albeit not sure I'd call him an early peaker by any shot. No idea who the other is though
 
Re: Re:

craigmalone said:
carton said:
GuyIncognito said:
The only names that come to mind are Vanderaerden and Van Hooydonck but they're from inbetween the two Brabants, not either of them.
And I have no idea what his all time rankings are, or what the nicknames are supposed to be.
Both of them have gone by the nickname "The Cannibal". One perhaps more than the other.

Merckx as the 31 year old one then, albeit not sure I'd call him an early peaker by any shot. No idea who the other is though

I guess he means Vos. Meh.
 
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
craigmalone said:
Merckx as the 31 year old one then, albeit not sure I'd call him an early peaker by any shot. No idea who the other is though

I guess he means Vos. Meh.
Sorry to disappoint. Thanks for playing along, though.

Those are two of the best cyclists of all-time, IMHO. Vos hasn't won anything noteworthy on the road since she was Tom Dumoulin's age (European Championships?), and Merckx was around Wout Poels' age when he won his last big race (Milan-San Remo) - after nine months without any major results. When he won his last grand tour he was a couple of months older than Primoz Roglic.
 
Re: Re:

carton said:
GuyIncognito said:
craigmalone said:
Merckx as the 31 year old one then, albeit not sure I'd call him an early peaker by any shot. No idea who the other is though

I guess he means Vos. Meh.
Sorry to disappoint. Thanks for playing along, though.

Those are two of the best cyclists of all-time, IMHO. Vos hasn't won anything noteworthy on the road since she was Tom Dumoulin's age (European Championships?), and Merckx was around Wout Poels' age when he won his last big race (Milan-San Remo) - after nine months without any major results. When he won his last grand tour he was a couple of months older than Primoz Roglic.

I don't get Vos. Shes 30, still cycling and won the Tour of Norway and European Championships last year at that age.
 
Re: Re:

craigmalone said:
I don't get Vos. Shes 30, still cycling and won the Tour of Norway and European Championships last year at that age.
I mean I hope she proves me wrong. I think she's one of the best cyclists ever and I admire the way she carries herself and how she went after it in every discipline of cycling. But I haven't seen a peak Marianne Vos over the last four years.
 
Re: Re:

carton said:
craigmalone said:
I don't get Vos. Shes 30, still cycling and won the Tour of Norway and European Championships last year at that age.
I mean I hope she proves me wrong. I think she's one of the best cyclists ever and I admire the way she carries herself and how she went after it in every discipline of cycling. But I haven't seen a peak Marianne Vos over the last four years.

It's not her, it's the competition.
The level in women's cycling is massively higher now. Everyone involved says even 2015 doesn't compare to now.
 
To be fair to Andy, he was on top when a crash effectively ended his career. He puttered around in 2013-14, but never recovered. Without that crash, Schleck would’ve made the 2012 Tour a whole lot tougher for Wiggins. May not have won it because of the amount of TT KMs, but he was one of the top 3 climbers in the world (Contador was still number 1 entering 2012 TdF as Froome had only a podium in the Vuelta at that point).
 

Latest posts