Effects of coronavirus on professional races

Page 75 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 27, 2014
2,432
86
11,580
To me it feels like the implicit message of acting responsibly to avoid lockdowns is ignored in favor of reading it as an ok to act as normal, because the lockdowns are worse.

I see it completely differently. Act responsibly, wear masks, wash hands, don't touch face, etc. And stop spreading fear because majority of people are dying from other reasons: poverty, cancer, strokes, mental health, that are significantly amplified by the lockdowns and the fear being propagated. Be vigilant - don't be afraid.

But clearly the way one interprets the message is dependent on their own predetermined opinion. Mine is that consequences of lockdowns cause 10x deaths than lack of such actions, and it is starting to look like WHO finally realized it. Too bad it was 6 months too late and probably cost millions of lives
 
May 3, 2010
4,488
4,568
21,180
I'm seriously worried about the Vuelta now. The Giro reaching Milan isn't sure either. Vegni won't pull the plug, but the goverment might. The RvV seems safe, although indoor sports have just been banned in Belgiim.
 
Jul 7, 2013
8,142
14,996
23,180
I think the Giro may end on Sunday before the second rest day (which potentially could eliminate most GC contenders making the outcome unfair). The TT and Piancavallo to decide the race but they should inform the riders at least 2 days before to have a proper fight.
 
Last edited:
Sep 4, 2017
3,549
4,159
19,180
I think the Giro may end on Sunday before the second rest day (which potentially could eliminate most GC contenders making the outcome unfair). The TT and Piancavallo to decide the race but they should inform the riders at least 2 days before to have a proper fight.
Whether or not this happens its a plausible scenario and one the riders and teams should be planning for when deciding on their strategy for Sunday (ITT will be full gas effort anyway). Getting into Pink asap should be the aim for every rider in contention.
 
Jul 8, 2017
2,303
2,981
17,180
I don't think that Sunweb (mainly) and the other teams will only test in the rest day.
Especially considering we already had 3 positive cases on riders (interesting enough, all of them are amongst the top from the startlist). So as long as we make it to the weekend without news for posives, I'm confident enough that we'll go to Milan. Especially because Italy is doing still fine compared to most of Europe.

Vuelta in the other hand is at risk, but without checking the numbers, seems like Spain flattened the curve a bit, so as long as Vuelta starts, I think it's safe.


That said, why did they waited so long for the restart ? I mean, I think they released the new calendar in April and many European countries had their cases going down already in April, and many scientists raised voices that in summer the situation will easier to control. So, perhaps, they could start in early July despite travel restrictions in few countries.
 
Jun 9, 2014
3,967
1,836
16,680
The rapid antigen test is not the best choice for finding positives... if that is the goal of the process.

The story about the shared buffets in the 'bubble' are horrifying. The whole situation is shambolic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wheresmybrakes
Jul 31, 2018
73
86
3,780
The rapid antigen test is not the best choice for finding positives... if that is the goal of the process.

The story about the shared buffets in the 'bubble' are horrifying. The whole situation is shambolic.

Yeah I was shocked when I read about the buffets... are they really that stupid?
 
Mar 21, 2015
593
536
11,180
Yes, it makes you wonder how could they have not worked better at keeping bubbles and non-bubbles apart at hotels, etc, like the Tour (apparently) did.
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
the shared buffets thing sounds weird. wonder what exactly was meant by that? I stayed in a hotel during corona times (admittedly in late July when things were different and not in Italy) and the way dining was handled felt relatively secure
 
Sep 2, 2011
17,543
13,767
28,180
the shared buffets thing sounds weird. wonder what exactly was meant by that? I stayed in a hotel during corona times (admittedly in late July when things were different and not in Italy) and the way dining was handled felt relatively secure
I stayed in a couple of hotels in Italy in August and there were buffets, but guests weren't allowed close to them. Staff would always serve the food at the table.
 
Jun 19, 2009
4,071
1,400
18,680
Shared buffets (if that was the case) is as much a team management failure as a race management failure. Maybe more so. Why are you letting your riders do that ? Why are you (as the hotel customer) not insisting on separated dining ?
 
Aug 29, 2009
7,916
7,142
23,180
mathews retest being negative shows again how potentially damning this all is... but there is no other way

RCS did re-tests as well though before excluding the riders. So normally this should make false positives almost impossible to happen.
 
Aug 29, 2009
7,916
7,142
23,180
it was on Wielerflits


Jumbo confirmed that RCS did a re-test for Kruijswijk though, and also in Yates case it was clearly communicated, that two tests were done (first antigen, then PCR for confirmation). So I wouldn't jump to a "false positive" conclusion so quickly - it's actually more likely that Sunweb's quick (re) re-test was not correct
 
Jul 16, 2015
5,374
13,954
23,180
it was on Wielerflits


Jumbo confirmed that RCS did a re-test for Kruijswijk though, and also in Yates case it was clearly communicated, that two tests were done (first antigen, then PCR for confirmation). So I wouldn't jump to a "false positive" conclusion so quickly - it's actually more likely that Sunweb's quick (re) re-test was not correct

Says who, you?

It's been a constant for months now, i.e. a yo-yo back & forth between positive & negative tests for everyone (no matter who they are) whilst none get sick.

Let the carousel of insanity continue & we'll see where this ends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richwallone
Aug 29, 2009
7,916
7,142
23,180
Says who, you?

no, it's just maths. False positives do happen of course, but the chance to have two (antigen+PCR) of them succeeding each other is something like 1-10000, while there is around a 1-50 chance that the single antigen test was wrong
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: shalgo