This is easily the best team England have had since 2006. If they had a better right winger and a decent centre back alongside Smalling, they'd be real contenders.
Five of Switzerland’s 23-man squad have Albanian heritage. Ten of the Albanian squad were born or raised in Switzerland. Rarely can an international fixture have been contested between two such homogenous sides.
Brullnux said:Wales won, but it was close. BBC football commentators are terrible. They have the same grasp of the rules of football (which are fairly simple, especially the most important ones) of a 10-year-old kid who justifies every tackle after taking someone down by 'I got the ball'. Sure you may have got the ball, but you also razed the player. Thus, it is a foul.
Embarrising scenes in Marseille too
BigMac said:Stupid ref, nowhere was that a foul. Nice strike from Dier, though.
jsem94 said:GK error was the cause of England's only goal. Poor lineup too IMO. But they will improve.
BigMac said:jsem94 said:GK error was the cause of England's only goal. Poor lineup too IMO. But they will improve.
Joe Hart was not to blame. He was positioned correctly as he didn't know how that header would turn out. It could have been tense aimed at the nearest goal post and he would have saved it, but unfortunately for England it was boxed perfectly on the far side. Bit of a gamble for the goalie in this situations, really. If anything, the ones to blame are England's midfield for allowing that second ball to happen and Berezutski himself for scoring such a great goal.
Brullnux said:Awful from England. Absolutely awful. You are winning 1-0 until the end in a game that should've been won a very long time ago, switch off completely out of arrogance, thinking that the game was over. The commentators in England thought the same. But that is stupid arrogance. You know that in a tournament every chance you create counts, and England had so many but converted one. Russia played terribly, England dominated throughout and yet it finishes 1-1. This is not a team that will win a tournament. Teams that win tournaments win these matches . They win them comfortably. Hypetrain: derailed.
BigMac said:What happened in Marseille anyway? Just saw a video of a guy being hit with a chair sucker-style but there was no story attached.
Maybe I didn't make myself clear here. England's only goal, scored by Dier, was the fault of the Russian keeper who couldn't protect his half of the goal. The shot was nearly straight at him. Diabolical. He was even in the air jumping as the ball was struck.gooner said:BigMac said:jsem94 said:GK error was the cause of England's only goal. Poor lineup too IMO. But they will improve.
Joe Hart was not to blame. He was positioned correctly as he didn't know how that header would turn out. It could have been tense aimed at the nearest goal post and he would have saved it, but unfortunately for England it was boxed perfectly on the far side. Bit of a gamble for the goalie in this situations, really. If anything, the ones to blame are England's midfield for allowing that second ball to happen and Berezutski himself for scoring such a great goal.
Wilshere was at fault, completely left Berezutski run off him for the header.
Pricey_sky said:BigMac said:What happened in Marseille anyway? Just saw a video of a guy being hit with a chair sucker-style but there was no story attached.
A really sad state of affairs featuring drunken English yobs, Russian yobs and local yobs in close proximity. 3 days of trouble.
Apparently Vardys wife was caught up in the mayhem inside the stadium when Russian fans charged on the England fans (which included women and children) at the full time whistle.
I have friends who have gone to Marseille for the match and are not trouble makers in the slightest, they are extremely critical of local police and how they've dealt with the incidents.
jsem94 said:Maybe I didn't make myself clear here. England's only goal, scored by Dier, was the fault of the Russian keeper who couldn't protect his half of the goal. The shot was nearly straight at him. Diabolical. He was even in the air jumping as the ball was struck.gooner said:BigMac said:jsem94 said:GK error was the cause of England's only goal. Poor lineup too IMO. But they will improve.
Joe Hart was not to blame. He was positioned correctly as he didn't know how that header would turn out. It could have been tense aimed at the nearest goal post and he would have saved it, but unfortunately for England it was boxed perfectly on the far side. Bit of a gamble for the goalie in this situations, really. If anything, the ones to blame are England's midfield for allowing that second ball to happen and Berezutski himself for scoring such a great goal.
Wilshere was at fault, completely left Berezutski run off him for the header.
Hodgson was to blame for being a coward.gooner said:BigMac said:jsem94 said:GK error was the cause of England's only goal. Poor lineup too IMO. But they will improve.
Joe Hart was not to blame. He was positioned correctly as he didn't know how that header would turn out. It could have been tense aimed at the nearest goal post and he would have saved it, but unfortunately for England it was boxed perfectly on the far side. Bit of a gamble for the goalie in this situations, really. If anything, the ones to blame are England's midfield for allowing that second ball to happen and Berezutski himself for scoring such a great goal.
Wilshere was at fault, completely left Berezutski run off him for the header.
It was a good performance, but against a very poor team, who struggled to string more than 5 possess together, maybe due to England's pressing but also to just a bad performance.Cannibal72 said:Brullnux said:Awful from England. Absolutely awful. You are winning 1-0 until the end in a game that should've been won a very long time ago, switch off completely out of arrogance, thinking that the game was over. The commentators in England thought the same. But that is stupid arrogance. You know that in a tournament every chance you create counts, and England had so many but converted one. Russia played terribly, England dominated throughout and yet it finishes 1-1. This is not a team that will win a tournament. Teams that win tournaments win these matches . They win them comfortably. Hypetrain: derailed.
I know that by the bolded you mean 'matches that you dominate', but the fact is that in these matches - that is the group stages - making every chance count really doesn't matter that much. Most good teams warm up as the tournament progresses; England are still overwhelmingly likely to make it out of the group, and (especially if they win on Thursday) those dropped two points won't matter very much. Some examples:
2014 World Cup: Germany impress against Portugal, but are limp in drawing with Ghana and struggle to close the game down against the USA. Argentina are not especially good across the group stages, requiring Messi's brilliance to break an interminable deadlock against Bosnia, dominating against Iran, wasting many, many chances until the 92nd minute, and then playing a fairly evenly matched game against Nigeria.
Euro 2012: Spain and Italy draw 1-1: Italy go on to 1-1 draw against Croatia. Spain otherwise impressive in group stages, to be fair.
2010 World Cup: Spain famously get beaten 1-0 by Switzerland in their opening match.
In summary, it's absurd to suggest that England's chances of doing well are over because Adam Lallana was terminally incapable of FINDING THE GOAL in one 90-minute game. England are unlikely to do well, but today's performance was very positive, not negative.
BullsFan22 said:BigMac said:Stupid ref, nowhere was that a foul. Nice strike from Dier, though.
Yeah, a very generous free kick given, but you are right, a nice shot from Dier. He almost made an own goal and had been timid a few times, but that did his confidence some good.
Brullnux said:It was a good performance, but against a very poor team, who struggled to string more than 5 possess together, maybe due to England's pressing but also to just a bad performance.Cannibal72 said:Brullnux said:Awful from England. Absolutely awful. You are winning 1-0 until the end in a game that should've been won a very long time ago, switch off completely out of arrogance, thinking that the game was over. The commentators in England thought the same. But that is stupid arrogance. You know that in a tournament every chance you create counts, and England had so many but converted one. Russia played terribly, England dominated throughout and yet it finishes 1-1. This is not a team that will win a tournament. Teams that win tournaments win these matches . They win them comfortably. Hypetrain: derailed.
I know that by the bolded you mean 'matches that you dominate', but the fact is that in these matches - that is the group stages - making every chance count really doesn't matter that much. Most good teams warm up as the tournament progresses; England are still overwhelmingly likely to make it out of the group, and (especially if they win on Thursday) those dropped two points won't matter very much. Some examples:
2014 World Cup: Germany impress against Portugal, but are limp in drawing with Ghana and struggle to close the game down against the USA. Argentina are not especially good across the group stages, requiring Messi's brilliance to break an interminable deadlock against Bosnia, dominating against Iran, wasting many, many chances until the 92nd minute, and then playing a fairly evenly matched game against Nigeria.
Euro 2012: Spain and Italy draw 1-1: Italy go on to 1-1 draw against Croatia. Spain otherwise impressive in group stages, to be fair.
2010 World Cup: Spain famously get beaten 1-0 by Switzerland in their opening match.
In summary, it's absurd to suggest that England's chances of doing well are over because Adam Lallana was terminally incapable of FINDING THE GOAL in one 90-minute game. England are unlikely to do well, but today's performance was very positive, not negative.
There is a big difference in drawing to the eventual finalists, or Croatia a very good team, or even Ghana or Switzerland to Russia, or at least that Russia. My problem is partly the lack of ability in the final moments, but also focus. They assumed the game was over, something that England when in the lead often do. They don't close it out, they lose focus. However, when losing, they fight to the last minute. They need to bring the same mentality to when they are winning. Italy of 2006 would've had a solid 1-0 or 2-0, not allowing after they scored Russia to have any shots. Germany would've won that, France of 1998 would've easily won that and Spain of 2008 would've out 3 or 4 past them. Had this been against a good side I wouldn't have been so negative. But it wasn't. If it were Italy playing I'd have had exactly the same reaction.