The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Eurosport commentators said that according to some rumours in TJV's camp yesterday morning, Roglic was expected to lose 90s to Pog. But I guess they didn't expect Pogacar to do so well and Roglic going just 44s is a really good performance. If his condition gets better he has good chances for 2nd.A very injured Roglič losing 44 seonds to a mutant Pogačar. Not bad!! Without the crashes on stage 1 and 3 he would be up there. Unfortunate, but the important thing is that he can improve and still perform. He seemed very relieved after the finish today and said he felt better than yesterday. Losing 25 seconds to Küng and 14 to WvA on a flatish TT would be a solid performance even without the crashes. But of course, there is a different outlier here. Pogi is in a different place where one would expect him to be in a TT like that. Oh well, Tour is still long!
Eurosport commentators said that according to some rumours in TJV's camp yesterday morning, Roglic was expected to lose 90s to Pog. But I guess they didn't expect Pogacar to do so well and Roglic going just 44s is a really good performance. If his condition gets better he has good chances for 2nd.
If Van Aert was in peak condition and had shown that in the first stages (which he wasn't and which was known), I could somehow understand it. Likewise, it could be defended to have kept Vingegaard in front as he is flying and fully fit. But this? No *** way can that decision be defended. Shameful.Roglic spanked the other GC guys today... & he spanked them hard. Imagine getting badly beaten by a mummy? Someone should call Brendan Fraser. Pogacar is of course hilariously in Dragon Ball Z unattainable territory, but Roglic is a fighter & he'll go for the podium if his body allows him. Van Aert meanwhile should go home & rethink his own self-importance.
Imagine leaving number 11 behind to rot on Monday after a crash whilst you sprint hard for the final 4km at the front just because you dream of the yellow for a day or two? That's what van Aert did.
Honestly I was so pssed-off when it happened I refrained from comment, but Jumbo shot themselves in the face with their bizarre focus on allowing van Aert room to fantasize about yellow. I just never see that sort of cr*p from teams focused on the singular goal of winning the Tour.
Would a healthy Roglic would have been faster today? Could he have been fast enough to beat Pogacar? Maybe, maybe not. But I know for certain if van Aert had been called back to ride for Primoz at 10km on Monday, he's be closer to the podium right now than he is. That's a fact in my mind.
If Van Aert was in peak condition and had shown that in the first stages (which he wasn't and which was known), I could somehow understand it. Likewise, it could be defended to have kept Vingegaard in front as he is flying and fully fit. But this? No *** way can that decision be defended. Shameful.
JV has a problem. Money. It always comes to money nowadays, doesn't it. The team cannot afford to pay riders as much as Ineos or UAE with seemingly unlimited budget can. So they compensate that by giving their (sometimes less than stellar) riders a lot of "opportunities for themselves". Kuss and Kruiswijk have been leaders in countless one week races this year (and failed to perfom misserably), George Bennet got to lead the Giro (while getting dropped with 20 riders left in the group and not being able to follow freaking Tratnik on Zoncolan) and so on... they compensate lack of money by giving riders freedom. Just so they can keep them. But I agree. If you want to win the Tour, whole team has to work for one goal. I know a day or two in yellow would be great for Wout. But that goes against what the team came here to do. Leaving your best flat engine in the front while your leader is trying to get back to the group is not the best picture... if anyone should stay in front it should maybe be Vingegaard, a backup GC option. WvA is not a GC guy in the Tour. He can go for his own chances in the TTs and sprints when Roglič is safely in the last 3km. Like last year. I love Wout, but as a team you should work for one goal. Like in Amstel. Roglič chased down all the attacks and Wout won. The team won.
I don't think having WvA in the train for the last 10km would make much of a difference with the time loss.
WVA said that he plans to contest tomorrow's sprint.I'm not naïve, i.e. I figured there's contractual & sponsorship obligations involved.
I can imagine WvA had certain "demands" acquiesced by Jumbo before he signed his contract extension (at a time when Ineos were forcing for his signature pretty hard). Going into this Tour all we head from the WvA side was "he's not going to ride in the mountains like last year & has objectives for after the Tour... but he does fancy a stage win or yellow in week one".
I'm sorry but that's total B.S. for a team with GC aspirations. I didn't want to believe it was serious talk, but they really did throw everything down the toilet just to follow through with that pre-Tour agreement.
Not that he's done anything wrong but why is Teunissen in this team this year? Van Aert can sprint already. Why not take Oomen or Harper or even Bouwman/Benett from the Giro. WVA doesn't need him surely
WVA said that he plans to contest tomorrow's sprint.
Putting himself (and his lead-out Teunissen?) at risk.
Yeah, this is not a pure GC- squad.
More like halfway between BORA and UAE/INEOS.
Today was possibly the best time trial Primoz has ever ridden, factoring in the injuries, suffering, and courage.
Not that he's done anything wrong but why is Teunissen in this team this year? Van Aert can sprint already. Why not take Oomen or Harper or even Bouwman/Benett from the Giro. WVA doesn't need him surely
They are currently more vulnerable in flat and rolling terrain than high mountains. I don't think Oomen would help when the wind blows.Not that he's done anything wrong but why is Teunissen in this team this year? Van Aert can sprint already. Why not take Oomen or Harper or even Bouwman/Benett from the Giro. WVA doesn't need him surely
They are currently more vulnerable in flat and rolling terrain than high mountains. I don't think Oomen would help when the wind blows.