Sure.Absolutely, look the strongest rider can follow the team of his rival in the mountains to then attack him. A team can make winning a GT go more smoothly, but it can't make a weaker rider win, unless the strongest has a problem.
Sure.Absolutely, look the strongest rider can follow the team of his rival in the mountains to then attack him. A team can make winning a GT go more smoothly, but it can't make a weaker rider win, unless the strongest has a problem.
Indeed, plus it's not like Soudal is the new Sky or Jumbo, so Primoz should have no problem keeping up if he has the legs.Sure.
Only if you assume that teams have no bearing on the result of their protect rider, which is something - I don't know how to put it - so ridiculous that the burden of proof is on you and those who stand by it.But this is entirely irrelevent, buddy, to the issue at hand; namely, Remco would only win because of the weakness of Roglic's team, which is bull-sheet.
True justice would have the losers shave the winners legs while they eat from the buffet at Pizza Hut. No one needs to win completely!In order to settle this debate, I think people should sign up for the Giro CQ game. Extinction and Co. will get a roster with only Remco in it, while Team Elos Anjos will have Roglič and 7 random weak riders.
The losers will either have to shave the winners' legs, or buy them a buffet at Pizza Hut.
Lemond won the 89 Tour without a team to support him. I don't assume the team has no bearing, but everything is still a function of having the strongest rider, without which it's a pipe dream.Only if you assume that teams have no bearing on the result of their protect rider, which is something - I don't know how to put it - so ridiculous that the burden of proof is on you and those who stand by it.
May 2023 and here we are explaining to Remco fans that any GT rider loosing some team mates over others with less quality might affect his overall performance. It's embarrassing.
Keeping up is one thing; needing help in a 3 weeker when you have mechanical or strategic needs is another. When Lemond won the major battles were almost mano y mano with little team assistance for him or the Professor. Winning against Hinault got down to an internal battle within the strongest team. Beating Chiapucci comes as the closest comparable success but still not equal to the quality of teams and tactics now.Indeed, plus it's not like Soudal is the new Sky or Jumbo, so Primoz should have no problem keeping up if he has the legs.
I don't know why was banned but just like before I think we should acknowledge a bias here. Every cycling site that has a take in Roglic's teammates fading due to covid or crashing call it bad luck. There's no other way to say it than to state that second tier options are likely to impact his chances and simultaneously to heighten Remco's. There is no other way to see it.If Roglic and Remco fans could stop fighting in their respective threads that would great, lest we get more DNS than Jumbo in the Giro
No, the sloppy thinking is on you. Teams matter in winning, but if a rider is the strongest he can win on his own. Roglic only needs to do well in the TTs and drop Remco in the mountains to win. He needs his team to ride tempo and control the break, but not to drop Evenepoel. That's on him. Now if Primoz is the strongest and has the strongest team, then Jumbo can kill the race. But Primoz losing to Evenepoel won't be because of the weakness of his team, rather simply that he wasn't stronger than Remco. There is a difference, and I mentioned this only in response to another poster anticipating that Remco fans would get all worked up should Roglic fans claim, were he to win, that it was only because Primoz had a weak team. That's the epitome of sloppy thinking.
Aren’t you forgetting about mechanicals and crashes? It’s not just two people racing without mishap in a vacuum; surely this has been a good reminder that sh*t happens. When a rider has an issue, he sometimes needs a teammate to provide a bike, help him, pull him back to a peloton. Stronger riders are more likely to still be there when you need them and they’re more likely to have juice in their legs. If the team is gone and you get a flat late in a hard stage, you’re on your own. This is why teams often send riders out in the breaks. Cycling 101. I know you know this; surely you can admit that losing your team could severely hurt your chances?Absolutely, look the strongest rider can follow the team of his rival in the mountains to then attack him. A team can make winning a GT go more smoothly, but it can't make a weaker rider win, unless the strongest has a problem.
Isn't that besides the point? Everyone is allowed to post crazy things, as long as it's done in a proper manner.at least man up and acknowledge that one side is posting crazy things and the other is just stating the obvious.
DamnitIf Roglic and Remco fans could stop fighting in their respective threads that would great, lest we get more DNS than Jumbo in the Giro
If you use 'the Fisherman' and 'the Skeleton', you should also use 'the Ski Jumper', 'the Überkind', and 'the Übermensch'.JV should just tell the Fisherman that innovative training camps will be in varius places of Italy to simulate race conditions and that even other guys like Remco agreed to take part. Even if Primoz doesnt win the Skeleton will (by accident, one day they will tell him to push 7 w/kg to simulate TdF against Pogi).
Who is more über though? Vinge, given his powerful legs and heart combined with super thin upper body, looks like a lab marvel.If you use 'the Fisherman' and 'the Skeleton', you should also use 'the Ski Jumper', 'the Überkind', and 'the Übermensch'.
Who is more über though? Vinge, given his powerful legs and heart combined with super thin upper body, looks like a lab marvel.
Or he’s ready to destroy people in the 3rd week as Remco does a S. Yates style implosion 👌He must be sick, otherwise it was one of his worst time trials of his career.
No, it was a mainly flat TT. He doesn't lose that much vs Ganna and comparable to Küng.He must be sick, otherwise it was one of his worst time trials of his career.
I don't know about being sick but it certainly didn't go as I expected. The Rogla we know should have been at least around Almeida's time.He must be sick, otherwise it was one of his worst time trials of his career.
It looks more like the UAE guys and Evenepoel just did really good. Besides that Roglic finished more or less where expected if you compare with guys like Ganna and Kung.I don't know about being sick but it certainly didn't go as I expected. The Rogla we know should have been at least around Almeida's time.