Let's be real. Roglic can't beat pogacar, Vingegaard has more weapons to beat pogacar in a grand tour. Roglic barely beat thomas, the guy that finished the tour 8 minutes behind Vingegaard. Roglic is a hell of a rider, but in long climbs Vingegaard is better, even in TT he is not superior. Jumbo has more odds to beat pogacar with Vingegaard than with roglic.
Let's not compare without adjusting for context on such a small sample.
Why should it be clear Roglič can't beat Pogačar? He distanced Pogačar on Col de la Loze only a day before the famous TT in a year where he got no proper training from Dauphine (where he was clearly better than Pogačar) till the Tour (because of a crash). Yes, he's more likely to crash out, but that's never a certainty.
If you compare head to head Tour racing, in Pogčar wins, the final time difference to Vingegaard was always bigger difference than to Roglič. If you take into account the one-day races, Primož has performed better than Jonas vs Tadej. This does not prove anything, but it shows easy it is to provide some seemingly meaningful information for whatever direction you want, but that's not enough to draw honest conclusions.
For me, I have not yet seen a legitimate case as to why Roglič can't win in a Tour vs Pogačar. And I like and watch both of them, specially in the past head to head encounters. (I also like Jonas, so I'm not trying to pump others up his account, only the last week, I said I'd probably put my money on him for the tour at the moment (though I'm not so sure my opinion is oscillating between Tadej a bit in the last days).