Better and younger.And he, Vingegaard, is better. That's it.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Better and younger.And he, Vingegaard, is better. That's it.
Being both better and younger is what it's all about. As you don't get worse.Better and younger.
…and more aesthetically pleasing.Better and younger.
…and more aesthetically pleasing.
It was just a bad attempt at being funny from my side, thinking in reality it’s obviously just the other way around. But I’m a guy - what do I know😁I don't know, I think they're both quite aesthetically pleasing.
But, are we even allowed to talk about that?
I think @CyclistAbi is inspired by a certain Slovenian reporter and columnist in their approach to use plenty of full stops instead of subclauses. Marcel is his name. @CyclistAbi, am I close?
Armstrong forgot two things of course. One, he's an idiot. Two, in this day and age everything is measured and teams know exactly what a rider is capable of. If Roglic had any chance of beating Vingegaard in a 1v1 (by which i mean assuming Vingegaard does not crash or get sick), then they would not have let him go. He was still under contract, and if they thought there was even a remote chance that he could win, knowing both riders capabilities, they would not have taken the risk. Vengeance does not magically unlock more watts that your body was otherwise unable to produce.
I don't know. What is it. You don't understand? Read what I write. Aloud. Maybe you can hear. What you say. Does it get through? Shall we practice more. It can become a habit. To always write like this. When I answer you. At some point. You either cry. Or laugh. I hope the latter. First.
All of this goes in the bin, because Roglic was still under contract. What you write is perfectly acceptable in case they needed to renew his contract or in case he was free to leave. But he wasn't. If they actually believed he could beat Vingegaard, then they would miss out on a lot more than whatever budget they sold him to Bora, in case he won the TDF for that team instead of theirs. So that simply doesn't make any sense. If that would mean keeping him unhappy for another year, then it would only make sense for them to hold him to his contract and send him to the Giro again.
And sure, form is fickle, training numbers are not competitive numbers etc. But please don't act as if Roglic is some enigma for Visma. They have made him what he is, and worked with him for the better part of a decade. They know what he is capable of in training AND in competition. In any circumstance.
Jumbo knows top Vingegaard beats top Roglic, period. And anybody that doesn't agree is delusional.
This is not F1 and i guess season 2024 should show, on why we love this sport so much.
I think they just found a loophole to compete with Remco thread post count@CyclistAbi Are you talking to yourself? There are 8 posts of you alone underneath each other...
Haha, that's going to be quite a difficult task to overcome the difference of 7K posts, the age difference that Roglic will stop riding before Evenepoel, and that Roglic has less racing days compared to Evenepoel. I wish him good luck with that.I think they just found a loophole to compete with Remco thread post count![]()
@CyclistAbi Are you talking to yourself? There are 8 posts of you alone underneath each other...
You have 3 posts underneath each other that is just you, and only quoting yourself. You can go ahead with that, it's your choice, just pointing out it's annoying to read, and will make me avoid this topic.It's in my opinion about basic rules of bon ton. To respond to each person in it's own post. That shows you see some value in it. But i can tuck your quotes somewhere in the middle. If you prefer that.
P.S. Nah, never mind that. In the end i will decide on where it makes sense to respond individually and when there is really no additional value in doing that.
At this point so much posts from the same user are turning the thread into a monolog. As tiresome as reading the usual tantrums from the usual users that don't add nothing.
You have 3 posts underneath each other that is just you, and only quoting yourself. You can go ahead with that, it's your choice, just pointing out it's annoying to read, and will make me avoid this topic.
Sorry, but no. I will continue as i see it fit.
I have no problem with that.
If i were into guys, there is no way i'd pick Vingegaard over Roglic unless he does an insane Mick Jagger impersonation.…and more aesthetically pleasing.
I don't think it would be necessary, because in march this thread will be very competitive when Roglic wheelsucks again Remco like he did on vuelta catalunya 2023, specially after Bora taking advantage in the TTT 😂I think they just found a loophole to compete with Remco thread post count![]()
Good for you...
That shows personal integrity. Not insufferable stubbornness at all...
I take valid criticism rather seriously. People nagging me about semicolons and holding basic rules of bon ton against me. I admit that i take that less seriously.
So what i could have done better is i could join two answers i gave to @Logic-is-your-friend into one post. As i was responding to the same person. Here in hindsight the problem was there was a wall of posts and i went at it in chronological order. So i will be more mindful about that part in the future. As for the rest, indulging the mob, forget it. Here my advice would be you should change before believing other persons should change for you.