• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Everybody needs a little bit of Roglstomp in their lives

Page 617 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I think @CyclistAbi is inspired by a certain Slovenian reporter and columnist in their approach to use plenty of full stops instead of subclauses. Marcel is his name. @CyclistAbi, am I close?

My advice would be, before making a decision, listen to all sides involved. Marcel will for sure give you one. As for your question, hopefully i am unique, desire shared by many, but the reality likely being i am not. I came to terms with that.
 
Armstrong forgot two things of course. One, he's an idiot. Two, in this day and age everything is measured and teams know exactly what a rider is capable of. If Roglic had any chance of beating Vingegaard in a 1v1 (by which i mean assuming Vingegaard does not crash or get sick), then they would not have let him go. He was still under contract, and if they thought there was even a remote chance that he could win, knowing both riders capabilities, they would not have taken the risk. Vengeance does not magically unlock more watts that your body was otherwise unable to produce.

Still best if you watch the video yourself, i guess. As the question was never about vengeance. I even wrote on what the question was in my original post. It's just that somehow that never caught up. So now you are basically discussing an interpretation of someone and not necessarily on what was asked and answered. Enjoyment doesn't have to come from vengeance. Enjoyment can stand on it's own and can have other motives too, when it comes to fulfilling it.
 
I don't know. What is it. You don't understand? Read what I write. Aloud. Maybe you can hear. What you say. Does it get through? Shall we practice more. It can become a habit. To always write like this. When I answer you. At some point. You either cry. Or laugh. I hope the latter. First.

When even people who have you on ignore totally get you. The you know you must be doing something right.
 
All of this goes in the bin, because Roglic was still under contract. What you write is perfectly acceptable in case they needed to renew his contract or in case he was free to leave. But he wasn't. If they actually believed he could beat Vingegaard, then they would miss out on a lot more than whatever budget they sold him to Bora, in case he won the TDF for that team instead of theirs. So that simply doesn't make any sense. If that would mean keeping him unhappy for another year, then it would only make sense for them to hold him to his contract and send him to the Giro again.

And sure, form is fickle, training numbers are not competitive numbers etc. But please don't act as if Roglic is some enigma for Visma. They have made him what he is, and worked with him for the better part of a decade. They know what he is capable of in training AND in competition. In any circumstance.

 
As for the discussion itself. The root causes are much more technical, then sentimental. Money, as Visma couldn't afford it more. Both Rogla and Jonas deserved a higher salary and that would not be possible if both would stay. Racing style, Rogla and Jonas don't have the same racing style. Considering they were now both leaders at the same team, that would just not work any more. Rogla racing style would always be impaired artificiality, by his team. First of all Jonas wouldn't pull for Rogla any more and Rogla would always have to wait for Jonas to implode, before getting his chance. Raise of Sepp didn't help either. It's like if the team is pushing every member of your team ahead, then you know the team doesn't really care about your personal ambitions and leaderships any more. Then there is the sports side of it. Rogla wants to win all and Bora wants that too. Visma was instead rather OK with Rogla not winning the Tour. So it's a no brainier. From fan side of things obviously this is a big win-win.

P.S. As for remark, by some, on how Visma will pull so hard, for Jonas, that everything else will fall apart. That is rather short-sighted take on it. Considering Visma was doing exactly that for Rogla in years prior, and Rogla managed just fine. So pull Visma, hopefully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
@CyclistAbi Are you talking to yourself? There are 8 posts of you alone underneath each other...

It's in my opinion about basic rules of bon ton. To respond to each person in it's own post. That shows you see some value in it. But i can tuck your quotes somewhere in the middle. If you prefer that.

P.S. Nah, never mind that. In the end i will decide on where it makes sense to respond individually and when there is really no additional value in doing that.
 
It's in my opinion about basic rules of bon ton. To respond to each person in it's own post. That shows you see some value in it. But i can tuck your quotes somewhere in the middle. If you prefer that.

P.S. Nah, never mind that. In the end i will decide on where it makes sense to respond individually and when there is really no additional value in doing that.
You have 3 posts underneath each other that is just you, and only quoting yourself. You can go ahead with that, it's your choice, just pointing out it's annoying to read, and will make me avoid this topic.
 
At this point so much posts from the same user are turning the thread into a monolog. As tiresome as reading the usual tantrums from the usual users that don't add nothing.

Sorry, but no. I will continue as i see it fit.

You have 3 posts underneath each other that is just you, and only quoting yourself. You can go ahead with that, it's your choice, just pointing out it's annoying to read, and will make me avoid this topic.

I have no problem with that.
 
Good for you...

That shows personal integrity. Not insufferable stubbornness at all...

I take valid criticism rather seriously. People nagging me about semicolons and holding basic rules of bon ton against me. I admit that i take that less seriously.

So what i could have done better is i could join two answers i gave to @Logic-is-your-friend into one post. As i was responding to the same person. Here in hindsight the problem was there was a wall of posts and i went at it in chronological order. So i will be more mindful about that part in the future. As for the rest, indulging the mob, forget it. Here my advice would be you should change before believing other persons should change for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
I take valid criticism rather seriously. People nagging me about semicolons and holding basic rules of bon ton against me. I admit that i take that less seriously.

So what i could have done better is i could join two answers i gave to @Logic-is-your-friend into one post. As i was responding to the same person. Here in hindsight the problem was there was a wall of posts and i went at it in chronological order. So i will be more mindful about that part in the future. As for the rest, indulging the mob, forget it. Here my advice would be you should change before believing other persons should change for you.

I think it's a little silly to respond to five different posts in five different posts and then immediately post two more posts and then end up quoting one of those, responding to yourself. There is an edit button for a reason.