The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The way I see it Roglic will stay at Bora until he retires. Only +1s from here I reckon and we should enjoy him while we still can.You said yourself that his initial contract was 2+1. Using that extra year could definitely have something to do with not getting Evenepoel. They wanted him, having both is difficult, so extending Roglic makes sense.
I think so too, we’ll probably enjoy him again in the Giro. I don’t expect much this spring thoughThe way I see it Roglic will stay at Bora until he retires. Only +1s from here I reckon and we should enjoy him while we still can.
Nope. +1 was probably activated when he won a grand tour last season.You said yourself that his initial contract was 2+1. Using that extra year could definitely have something to do with not getting Evenepoel. They wanted him, having both is difficult, so extending Roglic makes sense.
Okay.Nope. +1 was probably activated when he won a grand tour last season.
It's not all about Evenepoel.
Except attacking teammates and lying about it. Pretty much the only thing one can lie about in cycling and he does it.
Awww... come on... I know you're a Roglic-fan, and not like he's an angel.
Well. Not to bring that old story up again; Roglic probably has apologised to Wright by now...
It's not even remotely the same. One thing is stabbing somebody in the back and another thing is to stab somebody in the heart.
Well he believes Wright was wrong and he said as much (I happen to agree with him). Others may think otherwise but there is nothing devious there.Awww... come on... I know you're a Roglic-fan, and not like he's an angel.
Well. Not to bring that old story up again; Roglic probably has apologised to Wright by now...
I'm not saying it's the same in a 1-to-1 sense.
I was just giving an example of a time Roglic did/said something wrong.
But again; he probably has apologised by now.
As for Jonas apologising for his behaviour at the Vuelta and in general for slaying the king.
It ain't wright said FredI meant Roglic has probably apologised by now.
To Wright....
I meant Roglic has probably apologised by now.
To Wright....
And did Rogla forgive Hay Bale too?In general, when back stabbed, kneed, side bumped ... apologising for that whilst being on the receiving part, that would kind of defeat the purpose of apology. Forgiveness is the virtue some poses or lack in such situation. And Rogla forgave Wright and Jonas. Said that he didn't forget!
And did Rogla forgive Hay Bale too?
In general, when back stabbed, kneed, side bumped ... apologising for that whilst being on the receiving part, that would kind of defeat the purpose of apology.
It was the wright Roglič, not the wrong one.I think you know what the wrong Roglic did by blaming Wright for that crash was...
I think you know what the wrong Roglic did by blaming Wright for that crash was...
I analyzed this crash when it happened and it is obvious to me that Fred braced for impact and was fully aware that a crash would happen if he did not react to prevent it. And he did not react and he did not prevent it and he brought Rogla down. Rogla was unaware that Fred was there, that is also pretty obvious, otherwise he would have braced for impact as well.I think you know what the wrong Roglic did by blaming Wright for that crash was...