Yes. But the last rider to win 4 stages and win the final GC of a GT was Nibali in the Tour 2014. I didn't know that Roglič took the trophy cabinet remark so seriously.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Yes. But the last rider to win 4 stages and win the final GC of a GT was Nibali in the Tour 2014. I didn't know that Roglič took the trophy cabinet remark so seriously.
Vuelta stages must've been so boring in the mid-90s. "Which of the guys who can never beat Indurain in July is going to finish first today?"
When did the Vuelta move to it's usual August-September slot?
For a moment I wondered since when Nibali was a Frenchman.
View: https://twitter.com/GracenoteGold/status/1323663131260915714?s=20
Also he is now equal to Chris Froome in number of career wins with 46 (of course Froome's are bigger) and in days wearing the leader's jersey in La Vuelta. Both with 19. Valverde has 27.
Honestly I think with the lockdown being quite long racing before the lockdown didn't really matter at all, and the training circumstances during the lockdown is much more important.Yes it has been a surprise that Roglic's form has held up BUT he never raced before the lockdown which may have kept him fresh.
lol @ Jalabert not being a sprinter in '94, before his mutant nuclear transformation.
Exactly comparable. Roglic would feel he needed to at least keep pace with Pogacar on the flats and the pace was way faster than they would reasonably expect. He couldn't concede too much time and expect Tadej to blow up on the climb. In the end it only emphasized the exceptional ride Tadej had vs. the very average ride of Roglic.Not at all comparable. Roglic was considered to be the better ITT'er and had a 1 minute lead. Every sensible human being expected that Pogacar was going to blow up on the climb, considering he had never shown anything close to being worldclass on flat ITT's and was now putting down one of the best times on the flat section.
And for example he's 46-44 in wins to Nairo Quintana, he's 11-8 in GT stages, 28-23 in WT wins, 1-0 in Monuments, and if he wins Vuelta I think he has the claim to be an overall better rider.View: https://twitter.com/GracenoteGold/status/1323663131260915714?s=20
Also he is now equal to Chris Froome in number of career wins with 46 (of course Froome's are bigger) and in days wearing the leader's jersey in La Vuelta. Both with 19. Valverde has 27.
He won the Vuelta stage to Lagos de Covadonga that year, so '94 was not strictly before but the cornerstone of his mutant nuclear transformation.lol @ Jalabert not being a sprinter in '94, before his mutant nuclear transformation.
Reading that seems pretty clear.Exactly compatible. Roglic would feel he needed to at least keep pace with Pogacar on the flats and the pace was way faster than they would reasonably expect. He couldn't concede too much time and expect Tadej to blow up on the climb. In the end it only emphasized the exceptional ride Tadej had vs. the very average ride of Roglic.
Well I won't, certainly. If he had tried to won differently I suspect that success rate of his wouldn't be like it is today, don't you think...I had no idea Roglic had won so many races. I like that.
You can criticize HOW he wins, but not his success rate. I know we like to romanticize doomed long-range attacks -- I certainly do -- but at the end of the day, he's got nearly 50 wins in what, 4+ years as a full time WT rider, and he's not even a sprinter.
And for example he's 46-44 in wins to Nairo Quintana, he's 11-8 in GT stages, 28-23 in WT wins, 1-0 in Monuments, and if he wins Vuelta I think he has the claim to be an overall better rider.
I think the greater freedom to train outdoors and the early national championships that gave him and Pogacar some high quality racing weeks before anyone else from the elite level was a bigger factor than not starting his season in Jan-Mar.Yes it has been a surprise that Roglic's form has held up BUT he never raced before the lockdown which may have kept him fresh.
Well Quintana has two grand tours, roglic 1 + monument, both have been second in tdf (was pogacar a more monstrous opponent than froome 2013/2015? I don't think so) and comparable number of wins overall, so...Are there doubts that he is a better rider than Quintana??
Well Quintana has two grand tours, roglic 1 + monument, both have been second in tdf (was pogacar a more monstrous opponent than froome 2013/2015? I don't think so) and comparable number of wins overall, so...
Of course there is no doubt he is a better rider at this instant, and most likely in the future, but history, for now, seems pretty close to me, probably a tad in favor of Quintana.
said Chris FroomeI had no idea Roglic had won so many races. I like that.
You can criticize HOW he wins, but not his success rate. I know we like to romanticize doomed long-range attacks -- I certainly do -- but at the end of the day, he's got nearly 50 wins in what, 4+ years as a full time WT rider, and he's not even a sprinter.
All he has to do is get rid of that ugly elbows out climbing style. Everyone knows a stylish rider is a faster one...
Exactly. He’s figured out what works best for him.Well I won't, certainly. If he had tried to won differently I suspect that success rate of his wouldn't be like it is today, don't you think...