The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Tell me more about the Dutch press! I always wondered how to they look at Roglič. A "noname" that became nr. 1 in a Dutch team with many great Dutch riders. I thought it's game over for Roglič when JV signed big Tom, but looks like he's just too good.Some - also here - do not like his media appearances because of 'lack of panache'. He's not in the sport to entertain with words, 'for sure'. In this mediatised world this - and having a wrong passport - will cost him financially (and perhaps even a Velo d'Or or two).
But but - there's more subtlety in his words that is easy to miss. When he said that he was racing the Vuelta and as if is was a set of one-day races, this surely explains his 'punching approach' (his strength THIS TIME) but also that he was not sure about his legs to last another day. He got both, the roja and many (4) stages, at the end. La roja looks like a pure bonus. He was - unlike le Tour - very relaxed with much less pressure from the management which is over the moon with the result, if you read Dutch press today![]()
Lot of respect for Roglic imho, even though there's always gonna be a few to be disappointed with the Dutch riders underperforming. It does help that it's not like Dumoulin/Kruijswijk had to sacrifice chances to win.Tell
Tell me more about the Dutch press! I always wondered how to they look at Roglič. A "noname" that became nr. 1 in a Dutch team with many great Dutch riders. I thought it's game over for Roglič when JV signed big Tom, but looks like he's just too good.
I know van Aert barely touched his ITT bike this year, maybe Roglic or the team itself didn't think it was that important with only one ITT in the Tour? You might be right that he lost a tiny edge in ITT's but i'm not seeing a real dip compared to last year. Last year he won some shorter ITT's early in the season, by a few seconds. In the Giro he was only best in the climbing prologue and in the Vuelta he beat Bevin and Cavagna with less than half a minute over nearly 40k.I don't see Roglic as having a climbing potential of peak Froome/Contador/Nibali. I think him doing slightly worse in ITTs this year because he worked on his climbing might indicate he's near his peak?
I also think he isn't the strongest guy from a mental point of view.
Not really.
His sprint might be good enough against the GT climbers, but he doesn't stand a chance against the top notch classic riders (Ala, WVA, Hirschi, MVdP). He's not prime Valverde.
On the other hand, I agree his overall potential is still unclear. He has an insanely high base level. Can that translate to an insanely high peak performance a la Froome? I'm not sure, but you can't rule it out just yet. I'm curious if Jumbo will try a different approach for next year. His consistency is kind of unprecedented among GC riders this century. He's basically a Valverde who can podium any GT he rides. Perhaps they could sacrifice a bit of that consistency to have him fresher for his main target of the season?
It's possible it's just an impression based on him fading in the third week and his demeanor. It's also not the main point of what i was saying.His bounce after the TdF TT defeat speaks otherwise. Also, keeping a cool head during all the mountain attacks in Vuelta this year.
Lmao I didn't know this was a thing
Lmao I didn't know this was a thing
Lmao they made a medal for the guy who pushed Roglic in the ITT
There is a hell lot of wrong with this post but I think you really miss times when all the riders had asthmaI honestly think he's hit his peak, or about as close to it as we'll see him. And even if i'm wrong, i'm not so sure whatever he can still gain, will matter all that much. Pogacar is only going to get better and get better support. Carapaz is still going to get better (and get actual support), Dumoulin is a year younger, and he hasn't been "worn out" either and is sure to return significantly better than in 2020. Bernal is going to come back better. Carthy, Mas, Evenepoel, Hindley... all have a much bigger chance to leapfrog him, than him finding a so called magical "other gear". Having seen him winning plenty of one week stageraces comfortably, i can't help but get the impression three weeks is seriously "stretching him thin". I also think he isn't the strongest guy from a mental point of view.
In a sense he's caught between generations, and in his case, that may very well have been his luck. Froome, Thomas, Nibali... are all done (not to mention Contador etc), but Bernal, Pogacar are much younger and already hit a higher peak, caught a bigger fish than him. Even if he still has a small margin of improvement, there are guys waiting in line, who still have a much bigger margin of improvement while they almost or already surpassed him. It may very well have been his only real shot at winning the Tour, and i wouldn't bet my house on him ever winning any other GT either. Just like the window of opportunity has closed for Landa, Bardet, Pinot, Yates and others in their late 20's to early 30's.
In any case, i sincerely hope we get a less formulaic version of Roglic in 2021, because he's bored the snot out of me this year. In fact, imho it is an extra indicator there is no other gear. The scripted manner in which he rides (or the team for him), seldom if ever (since becoming an actual GT GC contender) attacking further than 400 meters away, tells me that is all he can spare in order to get the job done. Barely and in unspectacular fashion.
I think its more about some people here want the EPO times backMan, this forum is really quickly throwing fresh GT winner under a bus. He's just not good enough for this couch potatoes.
I think its more about some people here want the EPO times back
is it ? times when riders just went away and didnt feel legs are gone, Roglic gets criticized cause he doesnt do that. There are extremely small differences betwen the top ridersClinic talk, nah?
You can have differing opinions, but I think Logic has made a fair post.
Nothing wrong with that post. Not in the slightest. Or are you insinuating Carapaz, Carthy, Pogacar... are all doping? Because they all ride a hell of a lot more attractively.There is a hell lot of wrong with this post but I think you really miss times when all the riders had asthma
Don't spend your time with Logic guy. He's a known Roglič hater so any time arguing with him is time thrown away.
Check his posts. Every time he talks about Roglič is only when he can talk bad about him. Even if he wins, he didn't win exiting enough for couch Logic. It's never good enough for this guy and he manages to find a problem in any topic about Roglič.Logic is a Roglic hater? The only thing I know is he's quite a fan of van Aert and Evenepoel. But they are not yet rivals of Roglic.
Just because someone critizes a few aspects of a rider does not mean he's a hater. And certainly just because someone is not a huge fan of someone he's not immediately a hater. Does this thread have to be a cathedral?
I don't know who you're responding to, so i assume it's a user i blocked.Logic is a Roglic hater? The only thing I know is he's quite a fan of van Aert and Evenepoel. But they are not yet rivals of Roglic.
Just because someone critizes a few aspects of a rider does not mean he's a hater. And certainly just because someone is not a huge fan of someone he's not immediately a hater. Does this thread have to be a cathedral?