I agree Roglic does not ride like Vingegaard. How do you factor in something like Angliru, where he attacked from a few kms out? He didn’t drop Vingegaard, but he left everyone else behind.
He attacked a bit from far on Javalambre and Angliru, but he is not comfortable with that, and we can see why, by his results on high mountains finishes.
Mont bondone he was dropped.
He lost on la loze and gamoniteru to miguel angel lopez.
He won on angliru but he couldn't drop Vingegaard and finished just 19 s in front of landa.
On jalavambre he couldn't drop Vingegaard and finished just 7 s in front if ayuso.
Col de turini, he won but he finished with almeida and the "climbing monster perfomance" daniel martinez.
La colmiane, he just finished 5 s in front of the all mighty schachmann.
Lagos de covadonga stage was his best dominant perfomance.
He is not dominant in the high mountains, it's difficult for him to drop everybody and gain a lot of time to his opponents. He can't do what pogacar and vingegaard can do in terms of pure power, because he doesn't have it. Visma is not stupid, they didn’t let go the wrong horse, they have acess to all the data, and the results in the Tour speak for it.
He is clearly more comfortable on attacking in the last km, using is explosiveness to make the difference, because he is superior to everybody on that regard.