Teams & Riders Everybody needs a little bit of Roglstomp in their lives

Page 912 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I can only conclude that you are applying some sort of logical fallacy whereby you conclude that if Red Bull are very unlikely to win using the balanced team approach, they become more likely to do so with an unbalanced selection.

If we say that they have a 5% chance of victory by a traditional team selection, do you accept the logical possibility that a different strategy might have a lower, say 2%, possibility?

And if you believe that there is a selection that would give a significantly higher possibility, do you think that you are being reasonable by claiming that you know what that is, and that it is as simplistic as you suggest, and yet it is something that you cannot point to any example of any professional team manager ever having tried? (and did you not know that GT teams comprised 9 riders for many decades?)

If we take a figure of 5% as Red Bull's chances of winning with the sort of balanced team that most here are advocating, what probability of victory would you suggest your proposed line up might offer?
 
Sep 12, 2022
8,405
9,861
17,180
May 29, 2019
11,289
11,726
23,180
@Armchair Cyclist

While we are at professionalism, do you reckon you would get selected, as the Tour DS for RBH, claiming you will send a balanced team with 5% chance for the overall win in the 2026 season?

As for the suggestion, to sends the climbers orientated roster, compared to fearing the Tour might get lost on the flats and just to be sure to send a couple of stage hunters and sprinters along. IMHO yes, that has substantially higher chances to win the overall, compared to RBH leader isolated whilst reaching each penultimate climb. I read in RBH thread people would send a RBH sprinter section to the Giro in the 2026 season, last year most still suggested the Tour and a bunch of riders for stage hunting. So there is that, an improvement.

This is obviously the most feasible RBH strategy for the Tour 2026:

Wide-1_Credit_Joerg_Mitter-1000.webp


Rogla, Lipo and Remco to persistently apply pressure on the ultimate climb(s), strong climbers orientated team to support them to launch successfully and/or to apply some pressure early on, riders from the plan B moving in the break often to apply pressure, for a potential stage win, or more.


Can they crash and burn? Possibly. And even if they would then still a plethora of options for stage wins involved. Will they fail with the "flat" approach? Nobody is saying otherwise.

What good are those decades if Roglic didn’t race back then? 🤪

So true and it applies for at least mid term future too, after Rogla.

Stacked team with Roglic, Lipo and Evenepoel

As for the ego debate, they can use their egos to fight people that give them low chances to succeed, compared to using their egos to prove the doubters right.


Seems like a record packed season is ahead. Before that some much needed Goni Pony at play to ease the tension:

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4W5xYDRqM/
 
@Armchair Cyclist

While we are at professionalism, do you reckon you would get selected, as the Tour DS for RBH, claiming you will send a balanced team with 5% chance for the overall win in the 2026 season?
You seem determined not to engage seriously enough in discussion to pay attention to what I wrote, so a far as I am concerned the discussion is over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
May 29, 2019
11,289
11,726
23,180
@Armchair Cyclist

I feel that this answered your question:

As for the suggestion, to sends the climbers orientated roster, compared to fearing the Tour might get lost on the flats and just to be sure to send a couple of stage hunters and sprinters along. IMHO yes, that has substantially higher chances to win the overall, compared to RBH leader isolated whilst reaching each penultimate climb. I read in RBH thread people would send a RBH sprinter section to the Giro in the 2026 season, last year most still suggested the Tour and a bunch of riders for stage hunting. So there is that, an improvement.
 
May 29, 2019
11,289
11,726
23,180
@Berniece

Tour with Remco and Lipo plus with additional strong climbers support. As for the rest that is a bit less important to me as Rogla can win the rest with weaker team too. I would like if Rogla is there on when Remco wins his first prestigious one week stage race, maybe early in the season, and if they split the wins in between them whilst both racing LBL and Flèche, that works for me too.

If nothing will come of that and Rogla goes to races like ToS and Vuelta, due to team rather choosing other riders for the Tour, them believing Rogla should sit at the bench in 2026 season, regarding Tour, that is perfectly fine with me too. There is always season 2027 after and my heart says Vuelta anyway.