Evidence: Links Only!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
From the original thread and posts:
W
By the way, after having copied many of the links over here - a lot of these links go pretty far afield. There are many links to news articles, and some to blogs that are opinion pieces. When I get something that is a DIRECT RESULT of the USADA 2012 decision vs Lance Armstrong etc, I will label it clearly "USADA 2012 DECISION" so that it may be easily found. That is, if I see it, and if I am the one to move it here! Also, I am going to draw the line at blog pieces, unless they are by a recognized expert in doping or bicycle racing, or refer to direct evidence.

Race Radio said:
Over the next 10 days there will be a flood of evidence against lance. It starts today
http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/1...ong-was-regularly-tipped-off-about-tests.aspx
“The testers struggled to carry out spot checks without Lance Armstrong benefiting from a period of twenty minutes.

“In twenty minutes, a lot of manipulations are possible. He made infusions of saline to dilute the blood. He replaced his own urine by an artificial urine.

“EPO was administered in small doses…the substance was undetectable. Without information from the police or customs, it was impossible to fight this way.”

Quote:
“This support overflowed into the UCI (International Cycling Union) and the International Olympic Committee,” he said. “Lance Armstrong was surrounded by scientific physiologists, some of whom were discarded later. He had considerable resources to protect and implement logistics.

“There were rumours that he transferred blood from the United States in his private jet.”

He also alleged that former French president Nicolas Sarkozy pulled strings for the rider,
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
hiero2 said:
From the original thread:

Referring to the post above, RR posted:

Race Radio said:
This WSJ article is good but there are a few things missing

In 2001 Dr Leon Schattenberg from the UCI called Saugy and told him to drop it, the positive was "Going nowhere"

The UCI then arranged for a personal visit for Bruyneel to the lab so he could better understand the testing process, and make sure it did not happen again

In May 2010 some representatives from the UCI visited the lab to assess how much information had been given to the Feds. Shortly after Saugy changed his public story

It would be nice if someone would ask Pat if he ever told any riders or staff not to cooperate with the Federal probe as it was 'Going nowhere". I wonder if Lance told him that? It seems Wonderboy liked to brag about all his friends in the Justice Department. How they were going to take care of him
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
From the original thread:
the big ring said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrotha View Post
I was looking for a link to this story earlier today to educate the masses, and from what I could gather just a few months ago Saugy was still saying that the samples were doubtful, not positive, and that they followed the standard procedure and there was no cover-up. USADA's letter however is pretty clear on this point: positive and cover-up. Can you confirm this, or is this a matter of relatively recent articles repeating outdated info? Does USADA have evidence against Saugy?

I noticed recently that it was this lab in Lausanne (sp) that is now in charge of ABP - no doubt a nice little earner for them. And given their "history" with UCI, makes me wonder just how effective the ABP really is, if an EPO result can be handled this way.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17586597

Quote:
Both cycling and athletics have recently handed over management of the biological passport to a newly created Athlete Passport Management Unit (APMU), based at the Swiss Laboratory for Doping Analyses (LAD) in Lausanne.

When the lab was put in charge of ABP, Ashenden ditched them, because he had to ask permission before he could say anything publicly. At the time he was questioning the massive gaps in testing for some riders.

How hard is it to corrupt a lab?

I am sure they are not related, but it was ironic to find the name of one of the techs who works there is Annie Ferrari. ...

http://www.doping.chuv.ch/en/lad_home/lad-qui-sommes-nous/lad-qui-sommes-nous-personnel.htm
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
From the original thread:

TubularBills said:
The definitive reply to "never tested positive:"

http://nyvelocity.com/content/interviews/2009/michael-ashenden

3 Positives 1993 - 1996 (thanks to RR)

Testosterone-Epitestosterone ratios:

9.0-to-1 June 23, 1993;
7.6-to-1 from July 7, 1994;
6.5-to-1 from June 4, 1996.

Most people have a ratio of 1-to-1.
Prior to 2005, any ratio above 6.0-to-1 was considered abnormally high and evidence of doping;
in 2005 that ratio was lowered to 4.0-to-1.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/more/01/18/lance.armstrong/index.html#ixzz24bjqqsrY

8 to 10 positives 1999 - 2005

1. '99 Corticosteroids (illegimate backdated prescription without a TUE)

http://m.si.com/news/to/to/detail/3775061

2. '99 EPO 6 of 15 Samples (Suppressed by UCI)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2005/aug/24/tourdefrance2005.tourdefrance1

3. '01 EPO 1-3 Samples (Paid off UCI)

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ashenden-says-mcquaid-must-now-help-usadas-investigation

So... 11 to 13 Positives and Counting...

LA must have gotten tired of getting nailed... after 2001, he took definitive action:

Lance Armstrong was tipped off 20 minutes before he was tested, claims French anti-doping official

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/lancearmstrong/9499744/Lance-Armstrong-was-tipped-off-20-minutes-before-he-was-tested-claims-French-anti-doping-official.html

Quote:
----------------------------------------
Originally Posted by frenchfry View Post

http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme-sur-route/Actualites/Armstrong-prevenu-avant-les-tests/308442

A scientific consultant to the ALFD says that Armstrong was warned before each control. He also mentions techniques that can be used in 20 minutes or less to avoid positives. Not a lot of detail, but no ambiguity about the statement. He also states the UCI and IOC were involved in the warnings.
--------------------------------------------

..." warned before all the checks , "says scientific advisor to the French Agency for the fight against doping Agency (AFLD ) in Le Monde dated 26 and 27 August. "We did not know until the last minute which hotel it was installed" said Michel Rieu before explaining how, according to him, the American could mislead physicians: " The samplers have struggled to carry out spot checks without Lance Armstrong can benefit from a period of twenty minutes (...) His entourage has accumulated pretenses and palaver to get this famous time. "

"In twenty minutes, a lot of manipulations are possible, says Michel Rieu, giving details that were not all in the act of acusation U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (Usada ). (LA) was conducting infusions of saline to dilute the blood. He replaced his own urine by an artificial urine. It is administered EPO in small doses. The substance was undetectable."
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
from the original thread:

Race Radio said:
3 positives for Testosterone



Armstrong's testosterone-epitestosterone ratio was reported to be higher than normal on three occasions between 1993 and 1996, but in each case the test was dismissed by the UCLA lab of renowned anti-doping expert Don Catlin, whose lab tested the Texan some two dozen times between 1990 and 2000. In addition to detailing those test results, SI reveals what appears to have been a reluctance from USOC officials to sanction athletes using performance-enhancing drugs.

In 1999, USA Cycling sent a formal request to Catlin for past test results -- specifically, testosterone-epitestosterone ratios -- for a cyclist identified only by his drug-testing code numbers. A source with knowledge of the request says that the cyclist was Armstrong. In a letter responding to those requests, Catlin informed USA Cycling that his lab could not recover five of the cyclist's test results. Of the results that could be found, "three stand out," SI reports: "a 9.0-to-1 ratio from a sample collected on June 23, 1993; a 7.6-to-1 from July 7, 1994; and a 6.5-to-1 from June 4, 1996. Most people have a ratio of 1-to-1. Prior to 2005, any ratio above 6.0-to-1 was considered abnormally high and evidence of doping; in 2005 that ratio was lowered to 4.0-to-1."


Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/more/01/18/lance.armstrong/index.html#ixzz24bjqqsrY
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
from the original thread:

TubularBills said:
2009 Astana TDF Infusion Kits with DNA Signatures

oclaesp_logo.jpg


"Following last year’s (2009) Tour de France, it emerged that a department of the French police called OCLAESP (Central Office for the fight against environmental damage and for public health) was investigating one of the teams on the race.

Subsequent reports confirmed that the team in question was the Astana squad, with infusion kits being found in the medical waste left for disposal. The use of such kits is banned by WADA, making their use a sanctionable offence."


It was also reported that seven separate DNA traces were found on the kits. Levi Leipheimer left the race early on due to a broken wrist, suggesting seven out of the eight remaining riders could potentially be involved in the use of the kits.

http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/4837/Tour-de-France-OCLAESP-investigation-from-2009-still-ongoing.aspx

496806-astana.jpg


This evidence is a twofer.
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
This one is an extended post with several outside links and graphs. If what I get here doesn't look right, GO TO THE ORIGINAL POSTS. From the original thread.

TubularBills said:
2008 - 2010 Blood Samples:

The Mystery of the Five Missing Tests

UCI's suspicious list leaked from 2010 Tour de France

quote from python

quote from turner29

quote from catwhoorg

quote from turner29


Many feel the fluctuations will be corroborated by eyewitness testimony (minimum 13, 10 riders, 2 staff maybe more?) and expert testimony (Ashenden).

python above:
python said:
According to NY Daily News USADA has 38 recent blood samples. Some contain strong evidence of blood doping.

Article
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/i...ood-attempt-convict-cheater-article-1.1113450


2008-2012 blood parameters
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...nxueWRuZG9jc3xneDo1Mjk0MWEyZTk5YTNmMmMw&pli=1

I quickly scanned the parameters. Indeed his hemoglobin and % reticulocytes fluctuate in some cases wildly. the off-score is also all over the place.

turner29 above - #1

Turner29 said:
Look the very high off scores and their correlation to major races in which Lance Armstrong competed:

Tour de France, 4–26 July 2009:
108.4 17-Jun-09
98.9 2-Jul-09
thru
95.9 25-Jul-09

Tour Down Under 19 January to 24 January 2010:
102 11-Dec-09 (but no tests in the race?)

Criterium International, March 27-28 2010, Milan-San Remo March 20, 2010:
98.52 13-Mar-10
103.8 19-Mar-10

Tour de France, 3–25 July 2010:
92.5 1-Jul-10

catwhoorg above:

Catwhoorg said:
LA2009HBretOS.png


2009 in detail - with the races along the bottom.

HB falls dramatically during the Giro, so much that he would actually be defined as anaemic by the end. Then with 18 days it is suddenly his highest value for the year. However, there is not an increase in ret% which one would expect with a normal recovery (hence the large off score).

ret% remains low during the TDF, in fact gets lower still not quite dropping to an abnormal level,but very close. HB is a little all over the place (possible multiple small infusions ?)

After le tour HB and ret% shoot up (possible use of EPO ?), then there is a hue gap of 4 months with zero blood data.

In isolation, these definitely qualify as suspicious, even if they don't rise to the level of a passport violation, remembering the threshold for that is 99.9% certainty. It could corroborate other evidence/testimony.

I'd love to see Ashenden's interpretation though.

turner29 above - #2

Turner29 said:
I have to admit, that while suspicious, without further analysis and baseline, these value do show a blatant red flag.

Look here: http://www.anabolicsteroidcalculator.com/resources/articles/ebooks/doping/chapter13.pdf

In particular, Figure 5.
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
from the original thread:
TubularBills said:
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
from the original thread:
TubularBills said:
2001 Tour de Suisse - EPO + UCI Coverup

"Ashenden’s concern does not relate to the alleged use of banned substances such as EPO or human growth hormone, but an alleged cover up of a doping control at the 2001 Tour de Suisse.

Armstrong took part in the race and, according to USADA, several witnesses have given testimony that Armstrong told them that a positive test had been covered up. Two former teammates, Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton, have both gone on record to substantiate the claims.

USADA’s letter of notification also includes reference to their own interview with the Lausanne lab director, Dr Martial Saugy, who conducted the tests in 2001. Saugy told USADA that Armstrong’s samples were indicative of EPO use."

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/usada-case-against-armstrong-could-damage-uci-ashenden-says
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
Again, this is from the original thread. Again, I am not judging the quality of the link as evidence. The linked article reports on stuff in the LA case. It may not be strictly "evidence" for some people, but for people researching the information, it may be useful.
TubularBills said:
1999 Corticosteroids (Continued)



"In 1999, while Armstrong was on his way to his first Tour victory after beating cancer, a French newspaper received a tip that Armstrong had tested positive for a corticosteroid and had no therapeutic use exemption (TUE) on his medical form. Armstrong, who was riding for the Postal team, had just said in a press conference that he did not have any prescriptions for banned products. When the team discovered that the newspaper had received the tip, panic hit Armstrong and his inner-circle, according to Emma O'Reilly, a soigneur from Ireland who worked with the team and specifically with Armstrong. She (Emma O'Reilly) was in the hotel room after the 15th Tour stage when, she says, Armstrong and team officials devised a plan.

"They agreed to backdate a medical prescription," O'Reilly tells SI. "They'd gotten a heads up that [Armstrong's] steroid count was high and decided they would actually do a backdated prescription and pretend it was something for saddle sores."

In violation of its own protocol requiring a TUE for use of such a drug, officials from the UCI announced that Armstrong had used a corticosteroid for his skin and his positive result was excused. O'Reilly also told SI that, just before the start of the '99 Tour, Armstrong asked her to use some of her cosmetics to cover up injection marks on his arm, though O'Reilly does not know what substance Armstrong had injected. O'Reilly made these same allegations in a 2004 book about Armstrong, published only in French, called L.A. Confidentiel. Armstrong subsequently filed a libel suit against O'Reilly, the book's authors and its publisher. He also sued The Sunday Times of London for reprinting the allegations in a review of the book. (Armstrong settled The Times case for an apology and recovery of his legal costs, and dropped the others.)"

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/magazine/05/23/lance.armstrong/index.html
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
TubularBills said:
Dr. del Moral, USPS Physician 1999 to 2003



"Dr. del Moral, of Valencia, Spain, was the team physician for the USPS Cycling Team from 1999 through 2003. Until recently Dr. del Moral was affiliated with a sports medicine clinic in Valencia, Spain. USADA’s evidence is that after 2003, Dr. del Moral assisted individual cyclists, including a number of former USPS team members, with their doping. The evidence in Dr. del Moral’s case demonstrated that from 2000 he was intimately involved in the prohibited method of blood transfusions which cyclists use to boost the number of circulating red blood cells to increase the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood and increase endurance. Dr. del Moral brought riders to his sports medicine clinic in Valencia, Spain where he withdrew blood for prohibited blood transfusions. Dr. del Moral also assisted with saline infusions in order to keep the rider’s blood levels below threshold levels to avoid detection of their drug use. In addition to blood transfusions and saline infusions, Dr. del Moral administered banned performance- enhancing drugs including EPO, testosterone, corticosteroids and hGH to cyclists by providing these drugs to them, recommending the use of these drugs and directly injecting riders with these prohibited drugs."

http://www.usada.org/media/sanction-usps7102012

from the original thread
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
Old evidence, not new, but could be a useful recap.

TubularBills said:
Which Drugs Is Lance Armstrong Accused of Taking?

Erythropoietin (EPO), also known as “E,” “Po,” “Edgar” or “Edgar Allen Poe,” among other names. EPO is used by athletes to increase the number of red blood cells in their circulatory system which are available to carry oxygen. … Even after the EPO urine test was developed and implemented in sport in late 2000 EPO was difficult to detect and the Respondents [Armstrong, a team director, team captain and team doctors] implemented a number of means to avoid detection of EPO use, including: micro-dosing (i.e., using smaller amounts of EPO to reduce the clearance time of the drug), intravenous injections (i.e., injecting the drug directly into the vein rather than subcutaneously to reduce clearance time), saline, plasma or glycerol infusions (described below) and various effort to avoid testing by drug testers at times that EPO might still be detectable in the riders’ urine. … Multiple riders with firsthand knowledge will testify that between 1998 and 2005 Armstrong personally used EPO and on multiple occasions distributed EPO to other riders.

Blood transfusions (a/k/a “blood doping”). Blood transfusions generally involve the extraction of an athlete’s own blood pre-competition and re-infusion of that blood shortly before or during competition (e.g., in the evening or on a rest day in a multistage race) to increase the athlete’s oxygen carrying red blood cells. By increasing the number of circulating red blood cells, transfusions increase the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood and enhance endurance and recovery. No effective anti-doping test has yet been implemented to detect autologous transfusions (i.e., transfusions of an athlete’s own blood). … Multiple riders will testify that during the period 2000-2005 Armstrong used blood transfusions, was observed having blood re-infused, including during the Tour de France, and had blood doping equipment at his residence.

Testosterone. Also known on the USPS and Discovery Channel cycling teams as “oil.” Testosterone is an anabolic agent and can increase muscle mass and strength. In smaller doses anabolic agents such as testosterone can promote muscle recovery from strenuous exercise and increase endurance. Andriol consists of testosterone undecanoate, a steroid which can be mixed with oil and taken orally. Taken in this way the drug can be absorbed into the lymphatic system without being transported to the liver, making the drug more effective and reducing the prospect of liver damage. Multiple riders who competed on the USPS and Discovery Channel teams from 1998 through 2007 have reported that Dr. Ferrari [an alleged co-conspirator] developed a method of mixing testosterone (i.e., andriol) with olive oil for oral administration. … USADA has eyewitness statements from multiple sources that Lance Armstrong used testosterone and administered the testosterone-olive oil mixture to himself and other riders.

Human Growth Hormone (hGH). Human growth hormone is improperly used in sport to increase strength and lean muscle mass, to assist in weight loss and promote recovery. Multiple riders who competed on the USPS and Discovery Channel teams from 1998 through 2007 have reported to USADA that team director Johan Bruyneel, team trainer Jose Pepe Marti and team doctors Luis del Moral and Pedro Celaya provided human growth hormone to team members.

Corticosteroids (e.g., cortisone). These drugs reduce inflammation, assist in recovery and can provide a burst of energy and create a temporary feeling of increased energy and well-being. Throughout the relevant time period, corticosteroids were improperly provided to cyclists by team doctors and trainers to increase energy and enhance performance. … USADA will also rely upon firsthand testimony from witnesses who were aware of Armstrong’s use of cortisone without medical authorization.

Saline and plasma infusions. Throughout much of the relevant period the UCI [Union Cycliste International] employed a blood monitoring program and would not permit riders to compete if the rider’s hematocrit (i.e., percentage of mature red blood cells) exceeded 50%. To avoid exceeding the 50% hematocrit threshold and to prevent detection of the rider’s EPO use and/or blood transfusions, Respondents used the prohibited technique of saline, plasma or glycerol infusions to mask their use of prohibited substances and/or methods. … USADA will also present testimony concerning infusions given to numbers USPS riders, including Lance Armstrong.

http://healthland.time.com/2012/08/24/which-drugs-is-lance-armstrong-accused-of-taking/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.