- May 26, 2010
- 28,143
- 5
- 0
http://www.astanaproteam.kz/modules.php?name=astana&page=news&id=384
ASTANA PRO TEAM OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON JAKOB FUGLSANG POSITION
ASTANA PRO TEAM OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON JAKOB FUGLSANG POSITION
boilerplateBenotti69 said:http://www.astanaproteam.kz/modules.php?name=astana&page=news&id=384
ASTANA PRO TEAM OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON JAKOB FUGLSANG POSITION
Benotti69 said:http://www.astanaproteam.kz/modules.php?name=astana&page=news&id=384
ASTANA PRO TEAM OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON JAKOB FUGLSANG POSITION
Benotti69 said:Irondan said:It must have been generated when he was a mountain biker, which would date it around 2008 or earlier.Nick C. said:His is weird. He is listed as "mountain bike". It has no dates or frequency and is unsigned.HelloDolly said:Fuglsang not looking great .
It would explain how he rose and had 'form' for a few years but then dropped of as Cortisone has a limited window usage.
AlbineVespuzzio said:Benotti69 said:http://www.astanaproteam.kz/modules.php?name=astana&page=news&id=384
ASTANA PRO TEAM OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON JAKOB FUGLSANG POSITION
they say:
the facts leaked are from 2008.
we hired him in 2013.
he doesn't have any health problem.
and now the misstep in logic:
we reiterate our confidence in the rider.
(nothing before is particularly confident about the rider, in fact, it's the other way around)
I was beginning to think they were done....thehog said:Fancy about to drop another load...![]()
It's up!Irondan said:I was beginning to think they were done....thehog said:Fancy about to drop another load...![]()
I wonder who's next?
Diuretics are banned in sports because they can help with weight loss and could be used to speed up the elimination of drugs from the system. They increase the volume of urine produced by promoting the excretion of salts and water from the kidney.
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/viewtopic.php?p=2031650#p2031650AlbineVespuzzio said:One of the Brownlee brothers is a sick person.
Of course he is.
Diuretics are banned in sports because they can help with weight loss and could be used to speed up the elimination of drugs from the system. They increase the volume of urine produced by promoting the excretion of salts and water from the kidney.
2008885 said:We aren't that far into the FancyHack, but they're already scraping the barrel - Emma J getting pain relief during surgery......![]()
Benotti69 said:AlbineVespuzzio said:Benotti69 said:http://www.astanaproteam.kz/modules.php?name=astana&page=news&id=384
ASTANA PRO TEAM OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON JAKOB FUGLSANG POSITION
they say:
the facts leaked are from 2008.
we hired him in 2013.
he doesn't have any health problem.
and now the misstep in logic:
we reiterate our confidence in the rider.
(nothing before is particularly confident about the rider, in fact, it's the other way around)
I dont believe anything from Astana any more than Sky.
Yep, Wiggo's TUE's are the exception. Not the norm...thehog said:2008885 said:We aren't that far into the FancyHack, but they're already scraping the barrel - Emma J getting pain relief during surgery......![]()
Which is making Wiggins look worse and worse.
AlbineVespuzzio said:One of the Brownlee brothers is a sick person.
Of course he is.
Diuretics are banned in sports because they can help with weight loss and could be used to speed up the elimination of drugs from the system. They increase the volume of urine produced by promoting the excretion of salts and water from the kidney.
BullsFan22 said:Perhaps a lot of these TUE's are simply used as PED's in disguise? Perhaps some or most of the athletes in question are using them as excuses to dope. What about as something to use as a cover?
thehog said:BullsFan22 said:Perhaps a lot of these TUE's are simply used as PED's in disguise? Perhaps some or most of the athletes in question are using them as excuses to dope. What about as something to use as a cover?
I look at them and most appear to have backdated dates. I think they are AAFs which the athlete is advised to get a TUE to avoid a suspension.
ClassicomanoLuigi said:Yes, I believe you are right. The consensus view, from what we have read, overall, is that they have all TUE files of all athletes, and probably don't have anything else. When they gained access to the file directory, they would just grab everything in it. Would not be at all selective at that point. Comprehensive, but probably limited to the TUEsAnd I think this is probably going to be the extent of the material that Fancy Bears hack and leak. Like I said before on this topic, they hacked a particular database that will probably only yield TUE's, nothing more.
They have the skills, but they don't have the opportunity. It looks like a one-time breach using a crude method, and now, the server has been secured, as you said.Either Fancy Bears don't have the tools or knowledge to hack some real spicy information (positive tests being covered up, emails from the top guns, etc) and/or the people at the top...
Most logical explanation would be: it is the work of pro-Kremlin youth group hackers. When I was in Russia in the 1990s I felt like the situation was a wild-frontier, free-for-all, in which the young people still had not decided what they and their nation ought to become. And then, the more-recent time I went, that this undercurrent of right-wing sentiment had solidified.
The Fancy Bears' website is intentionally crudely constructed. That is either for comedy, or to make themselves look less-sophisticated than they actually are. The 'Anonymous' stuff, that part is all a ruse. The hack was unrelated to 'Anonymous', because those hacker kids' political agenda overall is much different. Grandiose, and to pretend that their motive is otherwise
The method seems to be - release a few at a time, spread geographically over the nations which they dislike the most - plus some distractions, planted using athletes from more marginal countries. And targeting some of the most-prominent athletes.OR, and this is a big question mark, Fancy Bears will come to that later, though if they actually realized what TUE's are, they may not even have bothered. On the other hand, they simply wanted to leak this information and have the readers come up with their own conclusions, which is perfect for us here in the clinic.
They don't know, and don't care, what the drugs in the TUEs are used for. Their idea will be: that anyone on the list is guilty by association, and then, equally-ignorant people will think "doper", whether it makes any sense or not.
Mostly defamatory towards elite athletes who have the misfortune of ending up on the list, since the large majority of the TUE files show no impropriety, just routine prescriptions which were nothing of interest.
This can run on for a very long time, and with the constant element of suspense "Who is going to be next?"
Volta ao Algarve: n/aClassicomanoLuigi said:Here is the text, which was reproduced on Daily PelotonNorks74 said:Apologies if this info is earlier in the thread or another one, but, does anyone know the name of the rider from Sky who supposedly was told he couldn't fly on Wiggin's private plane? This incident was mentioned in David Walsh's Telegraph article the other day. Apparently it transpired that the doctor (Freeman?) flew with Wiggin's on said flight.
One of his fellow British riders told a story about once asking Bradley for a lift back to England in the private plane that Wiggins had chartered. Wiggins refused. The rider’s disappointment was not lessened when he later heard that Freeman travelled on Wiggins’ private jet to the 2013 Giro d’Italia.
Walsh seems to have intentionally avoided naming him. But not hard to narrow down:
- British rider by birth or nationality
- Was with Wiggins, in Europe, in 2012
- That probably means: after the 2012 Tour de France
- Is not a dear friend of Wiggins, because Sir Wiggo refused him, directly, would not allow him to get on the flight
- Probably did not ride for Team Sky in the 2013 Giro d'Italia, but that is a matter of interpretation. Could have heard about the doctor's conveyance while at the 2013 Giro but before meeting Wiggins there
Putting all of those together would leave - not many possibilities, as to the rider's identity.
Supposing that the incident was after the 2012 Tour de France, here are the suspects:
Wiggins (GBR)
Froome (GBR)
Cavendish (GBR)
Porte (AUS)
Rogers (AUS)
Knees (GER)
Suitsou (BLR)
Eisel (AUT)
Boassen Hagen (NOR)
Leaves only Froome and Cavendish.
Of those two, I would choose Cav, for obvious reasons
Or if it was a different 2012 continental European race, then one would have to do some sleuthing on which British riders were with Wiggins at that event.
