gooner said:
There's a new book out in France and it apparently says that Koscielny and Lloris were two players who weren't happy with Nasri in the squad and told Deschamps he was a disruptive influence. Michael Landreau the sub keeper is also meant to have pushed for his exclusion.
I watched a bit of their game last night against Jamaica and turned it off when it went 3-0 but it seems a happier camp. You see the goalscorers going to the bench celebrating with the staff and subs.
Many were saying the team last night was probably his closest if not Deschamps's best 11 that he will start the World Cup with. This isn't me talking with my Arsenal shirt on but how is Koscielny behind Sakho in the pecking order. Look at Liverpool's defensive record with him in the line up and Koscielny was on a different level to him this past season. He's a classier defender. The same to a lesser degree with Debuchy starting over Sagna. I can't understand it.
France will still get through their group but I know who I would have in my team when they come up against the bigger guns later in the tournament.
There are a number of reasons why Sakho will start and Koscielny won't. Koscielny might play better for Arsenal than Sakho for Liverpool but Sakho's matches with the French side have been much better than Koscielny's. Koscielny has been pretty poor for France throughout his career and it's only the lack of quality defenders that have made him such a regular figure on the French team. In fact, him getting sent off was the only good thing from the first leg against Ukraine, because it forced Deschamps to start Sakho in the second leg. Up until those matches, Sakho wasn't ahead of Koscielny in the pecking order. But when the chips were down, one guy conceded a silly penalty, was MIA on the first goal and got sent off while the other scored two of the three goals needed to qualify for Brazil. So which of these two guys would you rather start against the big guns in high pressure matches, the one who choked or the one who played the best match of his season when his team desperately needed him to do so ?
Besides, when healthy, Varane is a clear number one and Sakho complements him much better than Koscielny. Also, you have to remember that France are also building their team for the Euro 2016 at home and the plan was always to have Varane/Sakho as a stable, well established basis for France's defense by then. Honestly, I'd rather see Mangala than Koscielny play for France if it ever came down to that. Koscielny is a fine club player but is way too erratic when he plays for France.
Debuchy and Sagna are a more tricky problem. Sagna is probably more solid defensively but Debuchy is better offensively. I think that ultimately it just comes down to the fact that Debuchy is more integrated in the team than Sagna. Sagna seems to play
alongside the rest of the team as opposed to Debuchy who seems to play
with the rest of the team (especially Cabaye and Sissoko). Of course, it might just be that Sagna was part of the team that embarassed itself in South Africa and Debuchy wasn't, and Deschamps has never seemed too keen to take the players from the 2010WC back and only did so when he felt it was absolutely necessary.