Froome stays in yellow, the right decision?

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Froome stays in yellow, the right decision?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 147 51.6%
  • No.

    Votes: 76 26.7%
  • Idc but it was hilarious!

    Votes: 24 8.4%
  • Vino would have ran past Mollemma

    Votes: 38 13.3%

  • Total voters
    285
  • Poll closed .
May 9, 2014
5,230
108
17,680
Re: Re:

SeriousSam said:
PremierAndrew said:
Bauke Mollema ‏@BaukeMollema 37m37 minutes ago
What's going on? Seems like everybody gets time bonuses. I wonder what would have happened if I would have been the only one to go down...

I'd bet Armstrong's remaining testicle that there'd be no adjustments

Doubt ASO would give Yates the 7 seconds for the flamme rouge and not give Mollema the same time as Froome and Porte for this if Mollema got held up while Froome and Porte were unaffected
 
Jul 17, 2013
33
0
0
I think the decision is the right one. But I fear, that it's just a case of protecting a favorite and that would be a shame.
 
Jul 16, 2012
336
34
9,330
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.
 
Re:

spalco said:
No.

**** happens in racing. And although this was a big ****, so to speak, and although I blame ASO, it was still an unfortunate race incident. An act of god you could say.

I want Froome to win the race, but I'm very uncomfortable with this.

The decision that's been reached is far from a perfect solution to what happened on the road today (and sure, it's favours Froome as he's the race leader, and so on) but it's about the best compromise available.

No rider wants to win the Tour because of this incident.
 
Jul 10, 2014
14,991
25,986
28,180
Re:

Armchaircyclist said:
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.

Seemed to me to be incompatible pedals that's why he couldn't ride it. Not able to properly clip in.
 
Apr 27, 2014
962
249
10,380
Of course. And all the GC contenders should be happy with this because the differences had been bigger if the crash hadnt happened. Im not a fan nor a hater of Froome, but the guy gets a lot of punishment from the cycling world; and its just jelousy. He isnt worse nor better than any of the others cyclists.
 
May 16, 2015
550
653
11,780
Quintana today the real winner. He would have been out of contention without the crash at least this way he still has a slight chance.
 

rick james

BANNED
Sep 2, 2014
7,677
110
12,680
common sense prevails...the worlds eyes where on cycling today and they fixed it the best way they could
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Yes of course it's the right decision, I would question why anyone would think otherwise. You cannot have the yellow jersey and 2 GC contenders whilst gaining time on rivals, caused to crash by a Moto/fans 1.2kms from the line in the TDF
 
Jul 8, 2016
143
0
0
Woah man it was all surreal. Mollema catching Froome and Porte, Froome running up the Ventoux like it was a marathon, Porte cursing his shitty luck yet again, the shitty neutral bike Froome can't even pedal on, Quintana almost asking for water again at the end of the stage...

Save this stage next to the weddings and anniversaires. There's no way we forget what just happened today :lol:
 
Aug 24, 2011
4,349
0
13,480
Re: Re:

Lequack said:
Armchaircyclist said:
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.

Seemed to me to be incompatible pedals that's why he couldn't ride it. Not able to properly clip in.


Also just looked the wrong size. Not quite me riding my daughters bike wrong, but clearly not a good fit.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Re:

gazr99 said:
Yes of course it's the right decision, I would question why anyone would think otherwise. You cannot have the yellow jersey and 2 GC contenders whilst gaining time on rivals, caused to crash by a Moto/fans 1.2kms from the line in the TDF

I don't know about "right"; but what else could they do?

It was certainly "right" for Froome & Porte but no one else and that's the point. It was unjust to the other riders especially Mollema.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Re: Re:

Catwhoorg said:
Lequack said:
Armchaircyclist said:
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.

Seemed to me to be incompatible pedals that's why he couldn't ride it. Not able to properly clip in.


Also just looked the wrong size. Not quite me riding my daughters bike wrong, but clearly not a good fit.

The neutral bike has Mavic pedals which is really pointless as no one really uses them. Froome had Shimano cleats which also work on Look.

The bike was size L, he needed XL.
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Re: Re:

Lequack said:
Armchaircyclist said:
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.

Seemed to me to be incompatible pedals that's why he couldn't ride it. Not able to properly clip in.

I read somewhere that the Mavic neutral service bikes are fitted with proprietary Mavic pedals, which nobody in the WT peloton uses, making the bikes literally useless.
 
Oct 10, 2015
3,115
1,652
16,680
Re:

rick james said:
common sense prevails...the worlds eyes where on cycling today and they fixed it the best way they could

It really wasn't the best decision they could come up with, if they wanted to be truely fair then nullify all time gaps in the GC and just award the stage win. It might seem harsh but we have seen time gaps for the GC neutralised in stages in other races due to weather conditions so this isn't that much of a side step to have done the same for this incident. This decision just makes the sport look more of a joke than it already is
 
Oct 10, 2015
3,115
1,652
16,680
Re: Re:

spalco said:
Lequack said:
Armchaircyclist said:
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.

Seemed to me to be incompatible pedals that's why he couldn't ride it. Not able to properly clip in.

I read somewhere that the Mavic neutral service bikes are fitted with proprietary Mavic pedals, which nobody in the WT peloton uses, making the bikes literally useless.

They still had toe straps in recent memory, why they still wouldn't have some bikes with toe straps for neutral service is a little baffling
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Re: Re:

StryderHells said:
spalco said:
Lequack said:
Armchaircyclist said:
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.

Seemed to me to be incompatible pedals that's why he couldn't ride it. Not able to properly clip in.

I read somewhere that the Mavic neutral service bikes are fitted with proprietary Mavic pedals, which nobody in the WT peloton uses, making the bikes literally useless.

They still had toe straps in recent memory, why they still wouldn't have some bikes with toe straps for neutral service is a little baffling

They use Mavic clipless.
 
May 9, 2014
5,230
108
17,680
Re: Re:

thehog said:
gazr99 said:
Yes of course it's the right decision, I would question why anyone would think otherwise. You cannot have the yellow jersey and 2 GC contenders whilst gaining time on rivals, caused to crash by a Moto/fans 1.2kms from the line in the TDF

I don't know about "right"; but what else could they do?

It was certainly "right" for Froome & Porte but no one else and that's the point. It was unjust to the other riders especially Mollema.

Well, Mollema was the biggest loser, but Froome and Porte were also losers. The Yates group gained big time and Quintana was the biggest winner as a result of the whole farce
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Re: Re:

thehog said:
gazr99 said:
Yes of course it's the right decision, I would question why anyone would think otherwise. You cannot have the yellow jersey and 2 GC contenders whilst gaining time on rivals, caused to crash by a Moto/fans 1.2kms from the line in the TDF

I don't know about "right"; but what else could they do?

It was certainly "right" for Froome & Porte but no one else and that's the point. It was unjust to the other riders especially Mollema.

Only part that is harsh on Mollema is they probably had a bigger gap than 30 seconds but he should be given same time as Porte and Froome. He was least affected because he was last man in the group
 
Jun 9, 2014
3,967
1,836
16,680
Re: Re:

StryderHells said:
rick james said:
common sense prevails...the worlds eyes where on cycling today and they fixed it the best way they could

It really wasn't the best decision they could come up with, if they wanted to be truely fair then nullify all time gaps in the GC and just award the stage win. It might seem harsh but we have seen time gaps for the GC neutralised in stages in other races due to weather conditions so this isn't that much of a side step to have done the same for this incident. This decision just makes the sport look more of a joke than it already is

Dan Martin would agree with you. Eliminating all gaps probably was the second best option for the integrity of the yellow jersey competition IMO.
 
Oct 10, 2015
3,115
1,652
16,680
Re: Re:

thehog said:
Catwhoorg said:
Lequack said:
Armchaircyclist said:
I'm no fan of Froome, but I think the decision was correct. Not impressed by how he was unable to ride a neutral bike though, that was weird.

Seemed to me to be incompatible pedals that's why he couldn't ride it. Not able to properly clip in.


Also just looked the wrong size. Not quite me riding my daughters bike wrong, but clearly not a good fit.

The neutral bike has Mavic pedals which is really pointless as no one really uses them. Froome had Shimano cleats which also work on Look.

The bike was size L, he needed XL.

Shimano cleats aren't compatitable with look pedals, they are to large to clip but I guess he could of gotten the head on the cleat into a look pedal but he wouldn't of been able to put any serious power through it without it slipping out.
 
UCI & ASO and whoever (rider reps) shouldsit down and discuss and thighten the rules...too many open to interprtation

This could be done in winter and then everyone knows where they are infutre and not up to the guys on the day

Need to sort out every scenario and possible consequences and write rules
including waiting fro the yellow jersey to take a p***

As a computer software designerand developer of databases and business analyst ....you have to spend alot time investigating scenarios and rules

UCY /ASO need to get there finger out.....current rules do not seem fit for purpose
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re:

HelloDolly said:
UCI & ASO and whoever (rider reps) shouldsit down and discuss and thighten the rules...too many open to interprtation

This could be done in winter and then everyone knows where they are infutre and not up to the guys on the day

Need to sort out every scenario and possible consequences and write rules
including waiting fro the yellow jersey to take a p***

As a computer software designerand developer of databases and business analyst ....you have to spend alot time investigating scenarios and rules

UCY /ASO need to get there finger out.....current rules do not seem fit for purpose
It's pretty simple isn't it? Just keep the results as they stand on the line in any circumstances. Bad luck already decides a lot of races and GTs - these situations don't happen enough to warrant specific rules.

If the peloton decides to slow down when someone crashes or whatever, then that's up to them - but there certainly shouldn't be any rule saying they have to. If Movistar or whoever else wants to attack in that situation, then they will just get a bad rep in the peloton and will probably be worse off in the long run.