Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

Page 1184 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Merckx, I agree with you 525% :) , the Froome clan disputes the test, but we have no Froome beating the test by taking the test as the story went. And all the studies can't off-set duplicating the subject, the time line, live re-enactment. If you plead the 5th, use lawyers, yes you can, bottom line is you're a cheat. Money can't buy me love.
 
The always entertaining Thomas Dekker:

maybe Froome is the cleanest Tour winner we’ve ever had in history.”

“It’s a difficult story because maybe we are looking at the cleanest cycling ever, but we are still in all those sh—ty scandals,” Dekker continued. “I don’t trust 100-percent the whole Sky team, but Froome is skinny as f—k. He improved his skills, and he works his ass off. Maybe he is? I don’t know.

Back in my time, people were doping and you could still have a nice life. You could go out, have a drink. Now it’s just a sport that is kind of freaky because you see so many skinny, anorexic guys. OK, there were skinny guys before, but those one or two kilos extra didn’t matter so much, or even three or four kilos, because you had the doping. But now, you cannot compete anymore if you are not as light as your opponent.”

http://www.velonews.com/2018/05/news/dekker-froome-is-maybe-the-cleanest-tour-winner-in-history_465752#Q7JVwTETMDaKXGlX.99
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re:

meat puppet said:
Entertaining on many counts. In addition to the jabs quoted above, reciting the party line, as in “Now you cannot do EPO, cortisone or growth hormone anymore, so maybe this is the new thing” was a nice touch.

Dekker trying to become a comedian.
 
Jul 29, 2016
634
1
0
the crashes of Froome are result of lack of self confidence and remind me LA in Tour 2010, he is not going to do it

interesting will be whether he will end his GT carrier same style as Wiggins
 
Re: Re:

Benotti69 said:
meat puppet said:
Entertaining on many counts. In addition to the jabs quoted above, reciting the party line, as in “Now you cannot do EPO, cortisone or growth hormone anymore, so maybe this is the new thing” was a nice touch.

Dekker trying to become a comedian.

Comedians all. Pro Cycling. WWF 'esque. Money and entertainment. Broadcast rights? Bike sales?
 
Re: Re:

Craigee said:
fmk_RoI said:
Wiggo's Package said:
It's going to be a long, long Giro if every single crash merits a post. And I presume speculation as to what drugs caused it...

They'll all be on tramadol and all other legal pain killers known to man kind, which could lead to crashes. It's been confirmed that Sky and British Cycling use tramadol on all their athletes.

I'm surprised at the lack of outcry about the tramadol use by the team. It's a very serious drug. An opiate and an antidepressant. Daily use causes opioid dependence just like any other opioid such as oxycodone or heroin. Using tramadol regularly when it is not necessary, such as when you're feeling well enough to be an elite pro cyclist, is dangerous for long term health due to the risk of addiction.

It's not rare to go from tramadol to heroin... in fact most heroin addicts started with pills like tramadol. Tramadol addiction is really common in some parts of the world like the Gaza Strip and Egypt. Tramadol can affect personality too, because you're doped up on an opioid while also being influenced by the oddities of serotonin and nor-epinephrine changes. I say this from personal experience having formerly used tramadol. So if you or anyone you know uses tramadol, please consider the risks.
 
I didn't realize this until now, but Douwe De Boer, the Dutch scientist whose opinion on the Heuberger paper seems to be at least one reason why Kerckhoffs thinks Froome will be exonerated, was one of Contador's scientific advisors during the clenbuterol case, and in fact was apparently the one who formulated the contaminated meat defense. He represented at least one other rider with the same defense, who also lost. So De Boer's opinion hardly should be thought of as an indication of what Haas will decide.

When you consider what De Boer said about CB at the time, it’s not surprising he would attack WADA’s salbutamol threshold:

De Boer also calls into question the lab's declaring an Adverse Analytical Finding for such a low amount, and argues that 50pg is 180 times less than the amount shown to induce physical effects by the drug.

He suggests that WADA-accredited laboratories should not report Clenbuterol levels which are below 1/10th of the MRPL (ie. 200pg or four-times Contador's level) as a way to avoid excessive doping positives as a result of food contamination.

So his defense of Contador, at least initially, was an attempt not simply to show that Contador had taken CB inadvertently, but that the WADA standard was wrong, that there should be a threshold for CB. I hadn’t remembered that, but given his attitude then, of course he would sympathize with a study that concludes that the salbutamol threshold is too low, or needs to be scrapped entirely.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/contadors-scientific-expert-de-boer-details-defense/
 
Re:

Merckx index said:
I didn't realize this until now, but Douwe De Boer, the Dutch scientist whose opinion on the Heuberger paper seems to be at least one reason why Kerckhoffs thinks Froome will be exonerated, was one of Contador's scientific advisors during the clenbuterol case, and in fact was apparently the one who formulated the contaminated meat defense. He represented at least one other rider with the same defense, who also lost. So De Boer's opinion hardly should be thought of as an indication of what Haas will decide.

Now that is interesting.
 
I don't know what to make of Froome's performance on stage 8, particularly his wobbling and bumping. (He was wobbling way before he crashed) My credulity is stretched beyond all limits. This is someone who has ridden professionally for years and is a multiple grand tour winner.
 
Jun 27, 2009
373
1
0
Re:

wirral said:
I don't know what to make of Froome's performance on stage 8, particularly his wobbling and bumping. (He was wobbling way before he crashed) My credulity is stretched beyond all limits. This is someone who has ridden professionally for years and is a multiple grand tour winner.

I think crashing, what is it, three times now, with a obviously dodgy right knee, a Sky train that for once, is not having it all their own way, and mostly, this enormous mental strain he's under.. I don't know what his caper is, but he looked truly cooked and stressed out at the end of yesterday's stage... no amount of tramadol can help that..
If he comes unstuck again on the Sasso today,and with the predicted rain and 2C temps, it might be enough to really knock him over if the other teams smell blood..
 
Re: Re:

spiritualride said:
Craigee said:
fmk_RoI said:
Wiggo's Package said:
It's going to be a long, long Giro if every single crash merits a post. And I presume speculation as to what drugs caused it...

They'll all be on tramadol and all other legal pain killers known to man kind, which could lead to crashes. It's been confirmed that Sky and British Cycling use tramadol on all their athletes.

I'm surprised at the lack of outcry about the tramadol use by the team. It's a very serious drug. An opiate and an antidepressant. Daily use causes opioid dependence just like any other opioid such as oxycodone or heroin. Using tramadol regularly when it is not necessary, such as when you're feeling well enough to be an elite pro cyclist, is dangerous for long term health due to the risk of addiction.

It's not rare to go from tramadol to heroin... in fact most heroin addicts started with pills like tramadol. Tramadol addiction is really common in some parts of the world like the Gaza Strip and Egypt. Tramadol can affect personality too, because you're doped up on an opioid while also being influenced by the oddities of serotonin and nor-epinephrine changes. I say this from personal experience having formerly used tramadol. So if you or anyone you know uses tramadol, please consider the risks.

What ? So we now have to look for track lines on Sky riders arms ? :D
 
Jun 30, 2014
7,060
2
0
Re:

TourOfSardinia said:
The utility of his low-fat approach is reduced
in the Giro when in May the mountains freeze your chest
Kinda:
(Tour) If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
(Giro) If you can't stand the cold get out of the chest freezer.
;)
Ryder also paid for it in 2013 when he showed up at around 68kg at the start of the Giro, he could now longer cope with the bad weather.
 
Jun 27, 2009
373
1
0
MartinGT said:
Dawg lost over a minute today. He will pull out now citing injuries sustained during the TT recon. But we all know its because he's riding pan y agua now uncle Cooky has gone.


Yep, even his team mates left him for dead... My prediction, like yours might well be correct, he'd pull the plug on the rest day, after a crash in the first stage or two. Looking at him at the end of yesterday's stage, he looked really done over, paler than usual, sunken eyes and generally done like a dinner. You can pull off a feint of exhaustion by pulling on the bars and making your face red, but I think the mental strain he's under is too much for him, and today's stage just reinforced that, I don't think he can afford to wait until week three, he's going to be too far down on GC by then, even with the patented egg whisk churning away.. His team don't seem to be supporting him well either, maybe he can't follow the wheels, maybe the team moral is suffering.
OR, maybe SDB is pulling the wool over all of our eyes and the magic transformation will happen just the right time, anything's possible....
 
Re:

Rollthedice said:
Cookson gone, in no time a positive surfaces then in his next GT, Froomey looks like an average top 20 rider. His fall will be quick and hard.

It appears the goose has indeed been cooked. No teammates pulling the train in the last kilometers of a decisive mountain stage. That's a big tell, I think.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
MartinGT said:
Dawg lost over a minute today. He will pull out now citing injuries sustained during the TT recon. But we all know its because he's riding pan y agua now uncle Cooky has gone.

You think Froome rode on only pan y agua at Barloworld? I don't.

I don't think he is riding on pan y agua now, but Cookson is no longer in charge and there may be a clause in his 1.4mill that he doesn't test positive or he loses the dosh so Sky who probably get 50% of the 1.4 are probably playing safe on the doping end of things. Just means no motor and no unlimited doping.