Re: Re:
...and it took them that long to come to that conclusion? Doesn't that sound a bit odd to you?bigcog said:The case was dropped because he didn't have a case to answer. If that isn't proving yourself 'clean' in this context I don't know what is.Benotti69 said:Nothing has been proved.rick james said:And its been proved he's innocent...a great day for clean cyclingAngliru said:I can imagine that is the very reason it was leaked. Someone saw how often he was skating by, with cycling fans being completely unaware, and decided to at least let it be known that all is not as pure and pristine as it appears.LaFlorecita said:And to all those saying this should have been confidential, bla blah, yeah, just imagine how many times he may have escaped in the same way and we know nothing about it. Good that it's been leaked. Now we all know for sure that he's a fraud.
God I'm so salty :lol:
The case will not proceed. That is all we are told.
Froome has not proved he is a clean cyclist.