Re:
Yes, of course...if their conclusions were based on it...it is of significant interest.
the more info out there the better.....but of course...it's of limited use if its unverifiable...the only point of interest is knowing its unverifiable and so should not be relied on......well....unless you're WADA :lol: :lol:
eh...there isn't any...they use verifiable data...otherwise there is a problem...they've re-written their rules for Froomesamhocking said:What previous anti-doping cases out of the previous several thousand that have concluded under UCI & WADA over the last couple of decades would you also like to see the unverifiable data for? Would you also be demanding to see the unverifiable data had Froome's AAF been confirmed and an ADRV decision?
Yes, of course...if their conclusions were based on it...it is of significant interest.
the more info out there the better.....but of course...it's of limited use if its unverifiable...the only point of interest is knowing its unverifiable and so should not be relied on......well....unless you're WADA :lol: :lol: