Re:
Yes, perhaps you are right. And maybe I am just mistaken regarding the extra ressources wealth brings to a cycling team.
Perhaps the combination of better/naturally gifted (?) riders, extra ressources to focus on details, organisation, diet etc. and access to top quality (and perhaps greater amounts of) doping really does result in the dominance we have been seeing from Sky.
The last 6-7 years surely does suggest this.
I think, I am just surprised, that the difference in performance levels between Sky and the other teams has been and still is so large. I would expect large and relatively wealthy teams such as Astana, Movistar, Bahrain-Merida to be able to at least to some extent close the gap. The best would of course be, if Sky's assumed doping advantage would be limited via anti-doping tests, but I am not that naive.
macbindle said:When was the last time Sky mentioned marginal gains?
Regardless of whatever doping is going on, it is also perfectly possible that their vast budget affords them luxuries that other smaller teams cannot afford. It may be able to afford better organisation. It is also possible that these things help. Other riders have often commented that they do.
Does it mean they race clean? Of course not.
Yes, perhaps you are right. And maybe I am just mistaken regarding the extra ressources wealth brings to a cycling team.
Perhaps the combination of better/naturally gifted (?) riders, extra ressources to focus on details, organisation, diet etc. and access to top quality (and perhaps greater amounts of) doping really does result in the dominance we have been seeing from Sky.
The last 6-7 years surely does suggest this.
I think, I am just surprised, that the difference in performance levels between Sky and the other teams has been and still is so large. I would expect large and relatively wealthy teams such as Astana, Movistar, Bahrain-Merida to be able to at least to some extent close the gap. The best would of course be, if Sky's assumed doping advantage would be limited via anti-doping tests, but I am not that naive.