So you make a broad sweeping generalisation, someone calls you on it and that's the best you can do?darwin553 said:Surely you jest. Next question.
Olga Yegorovadarwin553 said:There are plenty of examples in world sport where the initial, mediocre sportsperson have been able to rise to the top based on hard work and structured training programs.
It's so cold where I live if any of your Sky riders went outside they'd instantly freeze that is how skinny and abnormal they are. Well EBH would be fine, but the Anglo Saxons...not a chance.shakey88 said:Dear oh dear you guys really should go out and ride your bikes more,try and get rid of all that bitterness that's eating you up inside.
After all,you don't actually know anything,it's all suspicion and supposition.
If anyone from sky get's caught for doping then fair play,jump all over them.I'll be there with you.But until then all this endless,hate filled rhetoric seems a bit pointless to me.Save your energy for riding your bikes,enjoy the scenery and don't take things so seriously!
That's my ten bobs worth![]()
I might watch that stage then. Thanks for the heads up!GreasyMonkey said:The Dawg still has to negotiate Col de Manse descent into Gap at the end of stage 16, amongst others - Maybe they will have a nice cool wet day for that.....
Ok I'll give you one just to keep you all happy, well no I'll give you a hint. It is right in front of you.rata de sentina said:So you make a broad sweeping generalisation, someone calls you on it and that's the best you can do?
That's a circular argument. Any non-Sky examples?darwin553 said:Ok I'll give you one just to keep you all happy, well no I'll give you a hint. It is right in front of you.![]()
For your sake I really hope you don't mean Cuddles.darwin553 said:Ok I'll give you one just to keep you all happy, well no I'll give you a hint. It is right in front of you.![]()
Bingo. I'll fedex your prize.UlleGigo said:For your sake I really hope you don't mean Cuddles.
Haha. I gave him more credit than to make that argument. Maybe I shouldn't have.hrotha said:That's a circular argument. Any non-Sky examples?
Oh wait he did a test for Ferrari so that tarnishes him, right? Lol.UlleGigo said:Do some research.
The rider who was close to podium the Giro more than 10 years ago?darwin553 said:Bingo. I'll fedex your prize.
You lost me.Netserk said:The rider who was close to podium the Giro more than 10 years ago?
No.darwin553 said:Oh wait he did a test for Ferrari so that tarnishes him, right? Lol.
This. For a start.Netserk said:The rider who was close to podium the Giro more than 10 years ago?
Nah. Winning the TDF means nothing in cycling. Sheesh. Embarrassing.darwin553 said:You don't rate Cadel?
Hey Darwin, Not to be terribly rude, but it would help if you actually tried to learn about cyclings history.darwin553 said:Bingo. I'll fedex your prize.
Wait? So Cadel is implicated because of the manager's connection to LA? Clutching at straws I'm afraid but then again nothing like a good conspiracy theory, especially around hereFranklin said:Hey Darwin, Not to be terribly rude, but it would help if you actually tried to learn about cyclings history.
Hint: Check Cadels teams and their history.
Hint2. Check the managers Cadel has.
In other words: your claiming that Cadel is clean shows that your judgment of cycling is pathetically naive and more than likely wrong.
(and if you want to make the cas http://www.cricket365.com/basket/7187/story/8810719/England-call-up-Onions-Compton-exit that Cadel's progression is anything as Froom's... well...suffice to say nobody here takes you serious if you try that insane posture here)
Fantastic retort. I am truly amazed you managed to miss the managers connections (note the plural of both managers and connections) and come up with the LEAST damning fact. Thats like the biggest blinkers that are possible.darwin553 said:Wait? So Cadel is implicated because of the manager's connection to LA? Clutching at straws I'm afraid but then again nothing like a good conspiracy theory, especially around here![]()
It is a shame that LA destroyed your faith in cycling then?Franklin said:Fantastic retort. I am truly amazed you managed to miss the managers connections (note the plural of both managers and connections) and come up with the LEAST damning fact. Thats like the biggest blinkers that are possible.
Nothing wrong with BMC
And thank you for showing your sheer and utter lack of depth. Enjoy the Spectacle. I also advice you to watch WWF, though that might be a bit scary as those guys really hit hard.
Nope, I actually follow cycling a few decennia. But the 2000's were bad. Not just LA, but certain team from Andy Rihs was also important.darwin553 said:It is a shame that LA destroyed your faith in cycling then?![]()