His opinion is his opinion, there's no reason for it to have a bearing on anyone else unless they want it to. Why should anyone here be obliged to follow the reasoning process of David Walsh over anyone else?JimmyFingers said:Ah so Walsh joins the list of Sky 'fanboys', whose opinion can be dismissed out of hand as an irrelevance. Either that or he's on the payroll, like a few posters here apparently, me included (as has been accused in the past). You shouldn't have to go to such lengths to counter differing opinions, everyone's is valid, especially a seasoned and experienced journalist like Walsh.
I was hopeful that he may have been able to find out about a few of the mysteries and reveal information, so far that hasn't really happened?