ray j willings said:
I doubt Froome or Sky will get busted. His times stink of naughtiness and like Nichole Cooke said " times up climbs" Froomes especially as he his still regarded a clean rider are quicker than doped riders. I don't give a shi5 about wind conditions etc his times are only matched by doped riders. and none of the other riders in his tour winning year never got near his times.
As for Ferrari, I like him. He see's things in a different way and with Armstrong he had a unbeatable machine to push his doping ideas to the max.
I don't have any issues with doping under those circumstances. Much better to be supervised under a Dr like Ferrari or Leinders than risk the sort of disaster that happened to Ricco or Hamilton. It wont stop so lets stop pretending that sporting body's have a handle on it. They don't. the doped athletes are always steps ahead and they still are. Only the stupid ones get caught.
Disagree on several levels:
1. Sky will eventually be exposed. All it takes is a disgruntled employee, or someone spilling the beans after one too many pints at a family dinner or in a pub.
2. I have a 10 yr old, very good on a bike, and if you "don't have issues with doping" in what you describe as a controlled environment, I do. I don't want my kid to be someone's Guinea pig, I don't want him to cheat, I don't want him to be around the likes of Ferrari, Bjarne, or Vino.
3. Only the stupid ones get caught? For the most part, it is true. But some smart ones get denounced. Ask Lance

.
There will always be cheats, I agree with you, and I agree that the powers-that-be are, at best, looking the other way. Time to clean house. Cycling can be clean, or at least clean enough for a clean guy to win.